不同扰动方式对沙砾质戈壁地表风蚀量的影响

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00279

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过野外风洞实验，测定了不同破坏方式、破坏面积和风速下的沙砾质戈壁风蚀量。结果表明：不同破坏方式引起的风蚀量不同，扰动强度越大造成的风蚀量越多；相同扰动方式下连续破坏造成的风蚀量稍高于间隔破坏。风蚀总量随破坏面积的增大而增加，且服从指数函数。风速为8～10 m·s^-1时，扰动的戈壁地表以轻微侵蚀为主；10～12 m·s^-1 是风蚀量增幅最大阶段；当风速大于 12 m·s^-1时，以强烈风蚀为主。风沙流中沙物质的主体是细沙和极细沙，在20 cm高度范围内，自风沙流下层至上层细沙含量比较稳定，极细沙含量逐渐降低，中沙含量逐渐上升。

关键词: 沙砾质戈壁, 扰动方式, 风蚀量, 破坏面积, 风速, 粒度

Abstract: Field wind tunnel experiments were conducted to measure the quantity of wind erosion under different disturbance modes, area of disturbance and wind speeds. Results reveal that the amounts of wind erosion under different disturbance modes are different, the more intensity caused by disturbance, the greater the amount of wind erosion. The amount of wind erosion of the disturbance with continuous space is corresponding with the disturbance at intervals, and it increases exponentially with increasing the area of disturbance and wind speed. When wind speeds are 8-10 m·s^-1, wind erosion of gobi surface is relatively slight. However, as wind speed increases to larger than 12 m·s^-1, strong wind erosion occurs. The amount of wind erosion under 10-12 m·s^-1 is between both above. In addition, the change of sand transport rate with height obeys a exponential polynomial function. Sand particles eroded by wind in the experiments are mainly composed of fine and very fine sands in the 0-20 cm near-surface layer. With the increase of height, the proportion of fine sands keeps steady, very fine sands decreases and median sands increases.

Key words: sandy gobi, disturbance modes, amount of wind erosion, disturbing area, wind speed, grain size

中图分类号:

P931.3

殷代英, 屈建军, 俎瑞平, 谭立海, 安志山, 肖建华, 缑倩倩. 不同扰动方式对沙砾质戈壁地表风蚀量的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(1): 1-8.

Yin Daiying, Qu Jianjun, Zu Ruiping, Tan Lihai, An Zhishan, Xiao Jianhua, Gou Qianqian. Impact of Disturbing Modes on Amount of Wind Erosion of Sandy Gobi[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(1): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] Zhang W M,Wang T,Wang W F,et al.The gobi sand stream and its control over the top surface of the Mogao Grottoes,China[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2004,63(3):261-269.
[2] 刘连友,刘玉璋,李小雁,等.砾石覆盖对土壤吹蚀的抑制效应[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(1):60-62.
[3] Lancaster N.Relations between aerodynamic and surface roughness in a hyper-arid cold desert:Mcmurdo dry valleys,Antarctica[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2004,29:853-867.
[4] Dong Z B,Liu X P,Wang H T,et al.Aerodynamic roughness of gravel surfaces[J].Geomorphology,2002,43(1/2):17-31.
[5] 刘小平,董治宝.砾石床面的空气动力学粗糙度[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(1):38-45.
[6] 董治宝,屈建军,刘小平,等.戈壁表面阻力系数的实验研究[J].中国科学(D辑),2001,31(11):953-958.
[7] 张伟民,谭立海,张克存,等.不同砾石覆盖床面蚀积过程的野外风洞试验研究[J].地理科学,2012,32(11):1370-1376.
[8] 孙越超,麻硕士,陈智,等.砾石覆盖对抑制旱作农田土壤风蚀效果的风洞模拟[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(11):151-155.
[9] Wang W F,Dong Z B,Wang T,et al.The equilibrium gravel coverage of the deflated gobi above the Mogao Grottoes of Dunhuang,China [J].Environmental Geology,2006,50(6):1077-1083.
[10] 谭立海.不同覆盖度砾石床面防护效应的野外风洞实验研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2012.
[11] 王训明,郎丽丽,花婷,等.戈壁砾石覆盖度与风蚀强度关系实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):313-319.
[12] 屈建军,张克存,张伟民,等.几种典型戈壁床面风沙流特性比较[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):285-290.
[13] 屈建军,黄宁,拓万全,等.戈壁风沙流结构特性及其意义[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(1):19-23.
[14] 张克存,屈建军,俎瑞平,等.戈壁风沙流结构和风速廓线特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(1):54-59.
[15] 张伟民,王涛,汪万福,等.复杂风况条件下戈壁输沙量变化规律的研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):543-549.
[16] 尹永顺.砾漠大风地区风沙流研究[J].中国沙漠,1989,9(4):27-36.
[17] 屈建军,王涛,董治宝,等.沙尘暴风洞模拟实验的综述[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,(S1):109-115.
[18] 荣姣凤,张海涛,毛宁.土壤风蚀量随风速的变化规律研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004,22(2):149-153.
[19] Pye K.Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits[M].London,UK:Academic Press,1987:68.
[20] 成都地质学院陕北队.沉积岩(物)粒度分析及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1978:31-54.
[21] 陈冬梅,穆桂金.不同沉积环境下沉积物的粒度分形特征的对比研究[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(1):47-51.
[22] 苗壮,穆桂金,阎顺,等.艾比湖Ash浅孔沉积信息揭示的环境演变过程[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(4):367-371.
[23] 何清,杨兴华,霍文,等.库姆塔格沙漠粒度分布特征及环境意义[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):18-22.
[24] 刘树林,王涛,屈建军.浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化过程中土壤粒度与养分变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):611-616.
[25] 姚正毅,屈建军.青藏铁路格尔木-拉萨段风成沙物源及其粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):300-306.
[26] 吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:61-88.
[27] 朱震达,陈治平,谭见安,等.沙漠地区风沙地貌调查方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1961:27-35.