基于能值理论的奈曼旗农业生态经济系统可持续性分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

应用能值分析理论与方法对奈曼旗农业生态经济系统的能值流进行分析,通过典型能值分析指标的计算对其系统可持续性进行评估。结果表明：奈曼旗农业生态经济系统2004年能值投入总量为1.47E+21 sej(solar energy joules),不可更新环境资源和不可更新工业辅助能投入分别占26.11％和35.78％;系统能值产出为3.23E+21 sej,其中畜牧业能值产出比重高达72.52％。2004年系统农业经济发展水平和农牧民生活质量低于中国2000年农业的平均水平,但系统净能值产出率较高,在争取经济输入能值方面具有优势。系统可持续水平高于2000年全国农业生态系统的可持续水平,但不可更新环境资源的大量损耗给该地区农业的可持续发展带来了隐患。2000—2004年期间系统能值投入中工业辅助能投入比重逐年增加,相应的农业生态经济系统能值产出增长了78％,其中畜牧业能值产出增长了104.10％。在农业经济水平和农牧民生活水平稳步提高的同时,系统的环境负载率逐年上升,能值可持续性指数有下降趋势。

关键词: 能值理论, 农业生态经济系统, 奈曼旗, 可持续性

Abstract: The sustainability of agricultural eco-economic system in Naiman banner was evaluated with emergy analysis based on emergy theory. A paradigm (2004) about energy flows of the agricultural eco-economic system in Naiman banner was presented, together with the main energy flows and energy analysis indices of the system in the period of 2000 to 2004. The energy input ratio of non-renewable resources was 26.11％, which was the greatest potential danger to the sustainability of agriculture in Naiman banner, and that of non-renewable purchases was 35.78％. The 72.52％ of the total energy output was from stockbreeding in 2004. The agriculture development level and the standard of farmers' living were lower than those of China in 2000. The sustainability of the system studied, however, was better than most areas of China studied. Furthermore, with a high net energy yield ratio, agriculture of Naiman banner had advantage in encouraging investment. From 2000 to 2004, the energy input ratio of non-renewable purchases kept increasing year by year, along with a total energy output increase of 78%, to which the stockbreeding made the greatest contribution. Meanwhile, the increasing environment load ratio and the dropping energy-based sustainability index showed a sustainability decrease of agricultural eco-economic system in Naiman banner.

Key words: emergy theory, agricultural eco-economic systems, Naiman banner, sustainability

中图分类号:

F323

赵玉萍;赵学勇;左小安;黄刚;孟庆涛;. 基于能值理论的奈曼旗农业生态经济系统可持续性分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(4): 563-571.

ZHAO Yu-ping;ZHAO Xue-yong;ZUO Xiao-an;HUANG Gang;MENG Qing-tao;. Analysis on Sustainability of Agricultural Eco-economic System based on Emergy Theory in Naiman Banner[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2007, 27(4): 563-571.

参考文献

[1]Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M]．New York: John Wiley & Sons,l996:20-50.
[2]张耀辉.农业生态系统能值分析方法[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12（3)：181-183.
[3]Chen G Q, Jiang M M, Chen B. et al. Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 115:161-173.
[4]张希彪.泾河流域农业生态经济系统的能值研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(5):196-201.
[5]董孝斌,高旺盛,严茂超.黄土高原典型流域农业生态经济系统生产力的能值分析——以安塞县纸坊沟流域为例[J].地理学报,2004,59(2):223-229.
[6]陈东景,徐中民.干旱区农业生态经济系统的能值分析——以黑河流域中游张掖地区为例[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(4):375-379.
[7]付晓,吴钢,尚文艳,等.辽宁省朝阳市农业生态经济系统能值分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(8):902-906.
[8]白瑜,陆宏芳,何江华,等.基于能值方法的广东省农业系统分析[J].生态环境,2006,15(1):103－108.
[9]内蒙古自治区奈曼旗地方志编纂委员会.奈曼旗志[M].呼和浩特：方志出版社,2002.
[10]Ulgiati S,Odum H T,Bastianoni S．Emergy use,environment loading and sustainability：an emergy analysis of Italy[J]．Ecological Modeling,1994,73:215-268.
[11]Odum H T．Self-organization, transformity and information [J]．Science,1988,242：1132-1139.
[12]《农业技术经济手册》编委会.农业技术经济手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1984:1057-1093.
[13]陈阜.农业生态学教程[M].北京:气象出版社,1998:159-161.
[14]蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
[15]张华,李锋瑞,李玉霖,等.科尔沁沙地奈曼旗近5年来风况及合成输沙势[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(5):623-627.
[16]沙日娜,陈立平.内蒙古奈曼旗生态环境现状与治理对策[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(9):54-57.
[17]王涛,吴薇,赵哈林,等.科尔沁地区现代沙漠化过程的驱动因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(5):519-528.
[18]薛娴,王涛,吴薇,等.中国北方农牧交错区沙漠化发展过程及其成因分析[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):320-328.
[19]常学礼,赵学勇,韩珍喜,等.科尔沁沙地自然与人为因素对沙漠化影响的累加效应分析[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):466-471.
[20]乌云娜,裴浩,白美兰.内蒙古土地沙漠化与气候变化和人类活动[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(3):292-297.
[21]Browm M T,Mcclanahan F R. Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals[J].Ecological Modeling,1996,91:105-130.
[22]李双成,傅小锋,郑度.中国经济持续发展水平的能值分析[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(4）:297-304.