新型平口式集沙仪对不同粒级颗粒的收集效率

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2017.00058

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前，国内缺少对集沙仪集沙效率问题的深入研究。采用风洞实验手段，就新型平口式集沙仪对不同粒级颗粒的收集效率进行了研究。结果表明：该集沙仪对1～0.85、0.85～0.5、0.5～0.25、0.5～0.1、0.25～0.1、0.1～0.05、<0.1、<0.05mm粒级颗粒的平均收集效率分别为54.9%、59.6%、69.7%、52.6%、24.6%、21.0%、17.7%、13.2%，表现出对>0.25mm粒级颗粒收集效率较高、对<0.25mm粒级颗粒收集效率较低的特点。该集沙仪的集沙效率不是随着颗粒粒级增大而一直增大的，而是在0.5mm左右存在一个峰值。集沙仪的集沙效率没有表现出随风速变化的明显规律性，与各粒级颗粒风蚀强度之间也没有必然的联系。造成集沙仪对不同粒级颗粒收集效率差距较大的原因可能是不同粒级颗粒运动状态的差异和沙网孔径的大小。

关键词: 新型平口式集沙仪, 集沙效率, 不同粒级颗粒

Abstract: There is a lack of knowledge on sampling efficiency of sand collector in China. The sampling efficiency of a new flat opening collector for particles with various sizes was calibrated by wind tunnel experiment in the paper. The results show that the average sampling efficiencies are 54.9%, 59.6%, 69.7%, 52.6%, 24.6%, 21.0%, 17.7%, 13.2% for 0.8-1.0, 0.5-0.8, 0.25-0.5, 0.1-0.5, 0.1-0.25, 0.05-0.1, <0.1, <0.05 mm sediment, respectively. Its sampling efficiency is high for > 0.25mm sediment (>50%) and low for < 0.25 mm sediment (<25%). Sampling efficiency of the collector cannot improve constantly with the particle sizes increasing, but has a peak at about 0.5 mm in diameter. There is not obviously changing regularity of sampling efficiency with wind speed increasing, and there is not essential connection between sampling efficiency and wind erosion intensity at all particle sizes. The large disparity in sampling efficiency for different sizes of particles is determined probably by the difference in transporting modes by wind due to different particle sizes and the aperture sizes of the filtering screen.

Key words: new flat opening collector, sampling efficiency, particles with various sizes

中图分类号:

X169

王仁德, 李庆, 常春平, 郭中领. 新型平口式集沙仪对不同粒级颗粒的收集效率[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4): 734-738.

Wang Rende, Li Qing, Chang Chunping, Guo Zhongling. Sampling Efficiency of A New Flat Opening Collector for Particles with Various Sizes[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(4): 734-738.

参考文献

[1] Wang G X,Quan T W,Du M Y.Flux and composition of wind-eroded dust from different landscapes of an arid inland river basin in north-western china[J].Journal of Arid Environment,2004,58:373-385.
[2] 王仁德,邹学勇,赵婧妍.北京市农田风蚀的野外观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):400-406.
[3] Fryrear D W.A field dust sampler[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1986,41:117-120.
[4] Wilson S J,Cooke R U.Wind erosion[M]//Kirkby M J,Morgan R P C.Soil Erosion.Chichester,USA:Wiley,1980:217-251.
[5] 王金莲,赵满全.集沙仪的研究现状与思考[J].农机化研究,2008,5:215-218.
[6] Fryrear D W.Wind erosion and its effect on plant growth[J].Annals of Arid Zone,1986,25:245-254.
[7] Goossens D,Offer Z Y,London G.Wind tunnel and field calibration of five aeolian sand traps[J].Geomorphology,2000,35:233-252.
[8] Sharratt B,Feng G,Wendling L.Loss of soil and PM₁₀ from agricultural fields associated with high winds on the Columbia Plateau[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2007,32:621-630.
[9] 李振山,倪晋仁,刘贤万.垂直点阵集沙仪的集沙效率[J].泥沙研究,2003(1):24-32.
[10] 赵满全,付丽宏,王金莲,等.旋风分离式集沙仪在风洞内集沙效率的试验研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(6):1009-1014.
[11] 董治宝,孙宏义,赵爱国.WITSEG集沙仪:风洞用多路集沙仪[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(6):714-720.
[12] 李长治,董光荣,石蒙沂.平口式集沙仪的研制[J].中国沙漠,1987,7(3):49-56.
[13] Sharratt B.Size distribution of windblown sediment emitted from agricultural fields in the Columbia Plateau[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2011,75(3):1-7.
[14] Cheng H,He J J,Xu X R,et al.Blown sand motion within the sand-control system in the southern section of the Taklimakan Desert Highway[J].Journal of Arid Land,2015,7(5):599-611.
[15] Zhang C L,Zhou N,Zhang J Q.Sand flux and wind profiles in the saltation layer above a rounded dune top[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2014,57(3):523-533.
[16] 吴晓旭,邹学勇,王仁德等.毛乌素沙地不同下垫面的风沙运动特征[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):828-835.
[17] 王仁德,肖登攀,常春平,等.农田风蚀量随风速的变化[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1120-1127.
[18] Chepil W S,Mime R A.Wind erosion of soils in relation to size and nature of the exposed area[J].Scientific Agriculture,1941,21:479-487.
[19] Goossens D,Offer Z Y.Wind tunnel and field calibration of six aeolian dust samplers[J].Atmospheric Environment,2000,34:1043-1057.