img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生物与土壤

塔里木河下游胡杨(Populus euphratica)地上生物量估测

  • 董道瑞1 ,
  • 2 ,
  • 李 霞1 ,
  • 万红梅1 ,
  • 3 ,
  • 林海军1
展开
  • 1.新疆农业大学  草业与环境科学学院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052;
    2.新疆生产建设兵团林业调查规划设计院,  新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    3.新疆林业科学院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000

收稿日期: 2012-01-04

  修回日期: 2012-02-22

  网络出版日期: 2012-02-22

Aboveground Biomass Estimation of Populus euphratica in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River

  • DONG Dao-rui1 ,
  • 2 ,
  • LI Xia1 ,
  • WAN Hong-mei1 ,
  • 3 ,
  • LIN Hai-jun1
Expand
  • 1.College of Pratacultural and Environmental Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
    2.Forestry Survey and Design Institute of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumqi 830011, China;
    3.Xinjiang Academy of Forestry Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China

Received date: 2012-01-04

  Revised date: 2012-02-22

  Online published: 2012-02-22

摘要

根据塔里木河下游英苏至喀尔达依区段距离河流50~300 m的80个胡杨(Populus euphratica)一级枝生物量实测数据,采用数理统计方法构建胡杨一级枝和树冠生物量估测模型,在精度检验基础上筛选出最佳模型,并对其估测值与实测值进行卡方检验。结果表明:使用以胡杨一级枝条的基部直径(D)和枝条长度(L)派生因子D2L为自变量估测生物量(Sb)的模型Sb=125.546(D2L)0.654最优,使用以冠幅面积(A)为自变量估测树冠生物量(Sc)的模型Sc=0.016A2+2.291A+11.084最优,在离河300 m内,两模型平均估测精度分别为93.75%和87.01%;在离河600~1 500 m进行估测时需根据修正因子进行修正,修正后平均估测精度分别为86.04%和84.32%。根据全收获法得到的胡杨树干平均材积密度(748.43 kg·m-3)和样地每木检尺数据,使用树干材积计算式和树冠生物量估测模型,计算胡杨平均标准木的树干和树冠生物量,从而得到样地胡杨地上生物量数据。这一研究将为塔里木河流域胡杨生物量的遥感估测和胡杨林碳汇功能研究提供直接依据。

本文引用格式

董道瑞1 , 2 , 李 霞1 , 万红梅1 , 3 , 林海军1 . 塔里木河下游胡杨(Populus euphratica)地上生物量估测[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013 , 33(3) : 724 -730 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00104

Abstract

Mathematical statistics methods were applied to establish the biomass estimation models of first-class branch and canopy of Populus euphratica. Eighty first-class branches data  were collected in the sampling plots which were distributed 500-300 m distance to the river in Yingsu and Ka'erdayi section in the lower reaches of Tarim River.The best estimation models for each of them were picked out based on accuracy test, and then the significance of the difference between estimated value and measured value was tested according to Chi-square way. It was found that the equation model, Sb=125.546(D2L)0.654 (Sb, D and L refer to biomass, base diameter and length of first-class branch, respectively), which by using D2L as parameter was best to estimate the biomass of first-class branch, while the best equation model used to estimate canopy biomass was Sc=0.016A2+2.291A+11.084(Sc, and A refer to biomass and area of canopy, respectively), in which canopy area was used as parameter. Both of them can be applied to estimate the biomass within 300 m distance to the river, the accuracy of them was 93.75% and 87.01% respectively, but both of them must be modified when used in the range of 600 m to 1 500 m distance to the river, and the accuracy of them was 86.04% and 84.32% respectively after modified. According to the data of stem volume density (748.43 kg\5m-3) acquired (by harvest method and every tree measured in each square, to calculate the biomass of stem and crown of P. euphratica by using biomass estimation models, subsequently, the total aboveground biomass of P. euphratica was acquired. This study can provide direct evidence for the RS estimation of biomass and carbon storage study of P. euphratica in the reaches of Tarim River.

参考文献

[1]唐守正,张会儒,胥辉.相容性生物量模型的建立及其估计方法研究[J].林业科学,2000,36(1):19-27.

[2]崔夺,李玉霖,王新源,等.北方荒漠及荒漠化地区草地地上生物量空间分布特征[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):868-872.

[3]倪萍,牛博.干旱区荒漠植被的特点及恢复问题的研究[J].新疆环境保护,2004,26(增刊):103-106.

[4]刘兆刚,刘继明,李凤日,等.樟子松人工林树冠结构的分形[J].植物研究,2005,25(4):465-470.

[5]郭孝玉,孙玉军,刘风娇.不同估算树冠生物量方法的比较[J].林业资源管理,2010,(5):41-47.

[6]刘晓双,黄建文,鞠洪波.高空间分辨率的单木树冠自动提取方法与应用[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(1):126-133.

[7]熊轶群,吴健平.基于高分辨率遥感图像的树冠面积提取方法[J].地理与地理信息科学,2007,23(6):30-33.

[8]范少辉,刘广路,张群,等.华北沙地小黑杨林生物量及其与树冠关系的研究[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(7):71-76.

[9]卫智军,闫瑞瑞,运向军,等.放牧制度下荒漠草原主要植物生物量及能量分配研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1124-1130.

[10]崔秀萍,刘果厚,张存厚.浑善达克沙地黄柳人工林根系分布及生物量研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):447-450.

[11]安红燕,叶茂,徐海量,等.塔里木河下游胡杨径向生长量对生态输水的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):957-962.

[12]邓潮州,张希明,李利,等.河道输水对塔里木河下游胡杨生长状况的影响[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(2):312-317.

[13]邓铭江,董新光,李霞,等.塔里木河下游应急输水与生态改善监测评估研究[R].SCX2001-02专题报告,2004:42-44.

[14]Mariessii A,Betule E,Toshihicoko H.Growth patterns of tree height and stem diameter in populations of Abies veitchi[J].Journal of Ecology,1991,79(4):1085-1095.

[15]彭守璋,赵传燕,彭焕华,等.黑河下游柽柳种群地上生物量及耗水量的空间分布[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(8):1940-1946.

[16]蔡哲,刘琪璟,欧阳球林.千烟洲试验区几种灌木生物量估算模型的研究[J].中南林学院学报,2006,26(3):15-23.

[17]曾伟生,唐守正.国外立木生物量模型研究现状与展望[J].世界林业研究,2010,23(4):30-35.

[18]王建刚,李霞,石瑞花,等.塔里木河下游胡杨对输水的生态响应[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(4):619-625.

[19]Hepp T E,Brister G H.Estimating crown biomass in loblolly pine plantations in the Carolina flat woods[J].Forest Science,1982,28(1):115-127.

[20]孟宪宇.测树学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2007:305-307.

[21]古丽·加帕尔,陈曦,马忠国,等.极端干旱区荒漠稀疏河岸林遥感分类研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(6):1153-1161.

文章导航

/