退牧还草政策下农村住户的违约行为分析

刘 宁; 周立华; 陈 勇; 黄 珊

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00172

中国沙漠 >

2013 , Vol. 33 >Issue 4: 1217 - 1224

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00172

生态与经济

退牧还草政策下农村住户的违约行为分析

刘宁 ,
周立华 ,
陈勇 ,
黄珊

展开

中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所沙漠与沙漠化重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期: 2012-01-29

修回日期: 2012-03-04

网络出版日期: 2012-03-04

收起

Default Behaviors of Rural Households under Chinese Returning Grazing Land to Grassland Program

LIU Ning ,
ZHOU Li-hua ,
CHEN Yong ,
HUANG Shan

Expand

Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Cold and Arid Regions Enviromental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2012-01-29

Revised date: 2012-03-04

Online published: 2012-03-04

Fold

摘要

为讨论农村住户在退牧还草政策下面对一系列约束条件时的违约行为及其影响因素，本研究尝试建立农户违约行为的概率函数模型，实证分析如何在不降低农户效用的同时，规范他们的违约行为，从而达到可持续发展的目的。研究发现农户的违约行为（偷牧）只取决于其养殖规模、从偷牧中所获得的利润以及因偷牧被抓而需要直接支付的罚款金额（不包括上期违约行为对当期补偿的影响）。因此，要调控农户的违约行为，从政策层面适当指导调节养殖规模，对草原进行合理管理与利用（而不是一刀切的禁牧模式），引导区域产业转型以及促进城镇化发展等将是切实可行的措施。

关键词： 退牧还草; 违约行为; 效用函数; 可持续性

本文引用格式

刘宁 , 周立华 , 陈勇 , 黄珊 . 退牧还草政策下农村住户的违约行为分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013 , 33(4) : 1217 -1224 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00172

Abstract

This study is initiated to investigate the default behaviors of rural households and their impact factors under Chinese Returning Grazing Land to Grassland Program, by a theoretic economic model and a small size empirical analysis. The results show default behaviors of rural households are only depended on cultivation scale of livestock, the benefit and direct loss they can get from the default behaviors. As a result, to regulate default behaviors of rural households in China, measures which may work effectively include the modification of cultivation size of livestock, rational management and utilization of grassland, and a successful transformation of regional economy.

Key words： Returning Grazing Land to Grassland Program; default behaviors; utility function; sustainability

参考文献

[1]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and Human Well-being:The Assessment Series[M].Washington DC:Island Press,2005.

[2]Daily G C,Sderqvist T,Aniyar S,et al.The value of nature and the nature of value[J].Science,2000,289:395-396.

[3]Dasgupta P.Natures role in sustaining economic development[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2010,365:5-11.

[4]Pagiola S,Arcenas A,Platais G.Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty?[J].World Development,2005,33:237-253.

[5]Pagiola S,Bishop J,Landell-Mills N.Selling Forest Environmental Services:Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development[M].London:Earthscan Press,2002.

[6]Lipper L,Sakuyama T,Stringer R,et al.Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes:Economic Policies and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries[M].New York:Springer Press,2009.

[7]Liu J G,Li S X,Ouyang Z Y,et al.Ecological and socioeconomic effects of Chinas policies for ecosystem services[J].PNAS,2008,105(28):9477-9482.

[8]Tu Q,Mol A P J,Zhang L,et al.How do trust and property security influence household contributions to public goods?The case of the sloping land conversion program in China[J].China Economic Review,2011,22:499-511.

[9]Xu J T,Tao R,Xu Z G,et al.China’s sloping land conversion program:does expansion equal success?[J].Land Economics,2010,86:219-244.

[10]王向阳,王济民,张蕙杰,等.中国西部牧区退牧还草的政策支持[J].农业经济问题,2003,7:45-50.

[11]农业部.中国西部地区退牧还草工程成效显著[EB/OL].[2012-10-15] http://www.moa.gov.cn/ zwllm/zwdt/2011 08/t20110804_2102975.htm.

[12]程彦培.盐池县沙漠化土地动态变化影响因素分析[J].中国水土保持,2010,11:34-36.

[13]黄德林,王济民.我国牧区退牧还草政策实施效用分析[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(1):106-109.

[14]赵成章,贾亮红.退牧还草工程综合效益评价指标体系及实证研究[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(4):83-87.

[15]葛小东,黄超,叶青.科尔沁沙地2000—2008年农业生产技术效率研究——以通辽市各旗县为例[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1457-1462.

[16]周立华,朱艳玲,黄玉邦.禁牧政策对北方农牧交错区草地沙漠化逆转过程影响的定量评价[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):308-313.

[17]Luo M,Li G.Analysis of effects of different operation patterns of returning farmland to forest (grass) on rural economy-a case of Wuqi County,China[J].Asian Agricultural Research,2010,2(1):5-9.

[18]钟晓娟,赵岩,孙保平,等.盐池县退耕还林生态效益评价[J].中国水土保持,2010,9:34-38.

[19]Xu G C,Kang M Y,Jiang Y.Adaptation to the policy-oriented livelihood change in Xilingol Grassland,Northern China[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,13:1668-1683.

[20]王小鹏,赵成章,高福元,等.退牧还草政策下农户家庭收入影响因素的分位回归分析——基于双海子、北极、鹰嘴山、河源四村的调查研究[J].中国草地学报,2011,33(2):105-110.

[21]龚大鑫,金文杰,窦学诚,等.牧户对退牧还草工程的行为响应及其影响因素研究——以高寒牧区玛曲县为例[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(4):1169-1175.

[22]李新.退牧还草项目对内蒙古牧民收益影响的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2006,3:63-68.

[23]戴新刚,熊喆,Kramer K,等.羊啃食动力学模拟与内蒙古西部气候变化适应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1442-1450.

[24]杨微,宋乃平,韦丽军.禁牧前后盐池县农牧生产系统的耦合分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(6):335-340.

[25]陶燕格,宋乃平,王磊,等.禁牧前与禁牧后畜牧业成本差异对比——以宁夏盐池县为例[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(2):172-175.

[28]刘艳华,宋乃平,陶燕格,等.禁牧政策影响下的农村劳动力转移机制分析——以宁夏盐池县为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(4):41-45.

[27]张俊飚,李海鹏.一退两还中的博弈分析与制度创新[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2003,13(6):55-58.

[28]李艳梅,杨涛,徐邓耀.退牧还草的博弈分析[J].农业技术经济,2004,(1):34-38.

[29]张建娥,王建民.宁夏盐池县草原禁牧对畜牧业影响的调查分析[J].草业科学,2005,22(10):68-71.

[30]许晴,王英舜,许中旗,等.不同禁牧时间对典型草原净初级生产力的影响[J].中国草地学报,2011,33(6):30-34.

[31]王晓毅.从承包到“再集中”——中国北方草原环境保护政策分析[J].中国农村观察,2009,(3):36-46.

[32]Taylor J E,Adelman I.Agricultural household models:genesis,evolution,and extensions[J].Review of Economics of the Household,2003,1(1/2):33-58.

[33]de Janvry A,Sadoulet E,Zhu N.The role of non-farm income in reducing rural poverty and inequality in China[R].Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,UC Berkeley,2005.

[34]Groom N,Grosjean P,Kontoleon A,et al.Relaxing rural constraints:a win-win policy for poverty and environment in China?[J].Oxford Economic Papers,2010,62(1):132-156.

[35]Jacoby H,Li G,Rozelle S.Hazards of expropriation:tenure insecurity and investment in rural China[J].The American Economic Review,2002,95(5):1420-1447.

[36]Key N,Sadoulet E,de Janvry A.Transactions costs and agricultural household supply response[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,82(2):45-59.

[37]王小龙.退耕还林:私人承包与政府规制[J].经济研究,2004,4:107-116.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献