img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生物与土壤

干旱沙区典型人工植被群落下土壤剖面CO2浓度变化特征及其驱动因子

  • 黄磊 ,
  • 张志山 ,
  • 胡宜刚 ,
  • 杨昊天
展开
  • 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 沙坡头沙漠试验研究站, 甘肃 兰州 730000
黄磊(1983- ),男(汉族),河南南阳人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事生态水文方面的研究。Email:mathecology@163.com

收稿日期: 2012-08-28

  修回日期: 2012-09-23

  网络出版日期: 2014-01-20

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2013CB429905);国家自然科学基金项目(41201084,311703850);中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所青年人才成长基金项目(51Y251971)资助

Soil CO2 Concentration under Different Types of Plant Communities and the Driving Factors in Arid Desert Area

  • Huang Lei ,
  • Zhang Zhishan ,
  • Hu Yigang ,
  • Yang Haotian
Expand
  • Shapotou Desert Experiment and Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2012-08-28

  Revised date: 2012-09-23

  Online published: 2014-01-20

摘要

对人工固沙植被区柠条(Caragana korshinskii)群落和油蒿(Caragana korshinskii)群落下不同深度的土壤气体采样,主要研究和讨论了不同类型人工植被区下土壤CO2浓度的变化特征及土壤温度和土壤水分对其的影响。结果表明:柠条和油蒿群落0~80 cm处的土壤空气CO2浓度随着土壤深度的增加而增加,并且在0~40 cm,油蒿群落下的土壤CO2浓度值大于柠条,而在40 cm以下则相反。其平均值分别为1 229.3 μmol·mol-1和1 242.7 μmol·mol-1,大于同一深度流沙下土壤CO2浓度值978.9 μmol·mol-1。土壤水分与二者的土壤CO2浓度变化趋势在年际尺度上具有一致性,浅层40 cm内油蒿群落下的土壤CO2浓度和土壤水分含量的相关性明显大于柠条和流沙。而在40 cm以下,则表现为柠条>油蒿>流沙。土壤温度对土壤CO2浓度的影响程度一般为流沙>油蒿>柠条,特别是流沙,在表层达到了极显著的水平,之后随着土壤深度的增加而降低。而土壤温度对油蒿和柠条样地土壤CO2浓度的影响较为复杂,呈现出先增加后减小的趋势。在年际尺度上,土壤水分含量是不同植被群落下土壤剖面CO2浓度的关键限制因子,而在日尺度上,土壤温度则为主要限制因子。据粗略估计,在0~80 cm内,柠条和油蒿根系呼吸所占的比例约为30.7%和33.3%。

本文引用格式

黄磊 , 张志山 , 胡宜刚 , 杨昊天 . 干旱沙区典型人工植被群落下土壤剖面CO2浓度变化特征及其驱动因子[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014 , 34(1) : 125 -132 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00290

Abstract

Soil gas sample at different depths under different plant communities in the sand-fixing vegetation zones were obtained, and then the CO2 concentration in certain soil profiles and the impact of soil temperature and soil moisture on CO2 concentration were analyzed. The results showed that, Soil CO2 concentration under the Caragana korshinskii and Artemisia ordosica communities in the 0-80 cm soil layer increased with depth, the average value was 1 229.3 μmol·mol-1 and 1 242.7 μmol mol-1, respectively, which was larger than that in the same depth of mobile sand dunes (978.9 μmol·mol-1). The soil CO2 concentration under Artemisia ordosica community was more than the Caragana korshinskii community at 0-40 cm, but the direction was the opposite below 40 cm. Soil moisture and the soil CO2 concentration under different plant communities had consistency in the interannual timescale, soil CO2 concentration under the Artemisia ordosica plant community and the soil moisture content had the more significant relationship than the Caragana korshinskii community and sand at 0-40 cm soil depth, but under 40 cm, the order was Caragana korshinskii>Artemisia ordosica>sand. The influence of soil temperature to soil CO2 concentration was generally sand>Artemisia ordosica>Caragana korshinskii, especially in the surface layer, there was a significant correlation under the sand soil profile, and then decreased with soil depth. Soil temperature on soil CO2 concentration under the Caragana korshinskii and Artemisia ordosica communities was more complex, correlation analysis had showed that the correlation was smaller at 0-10 cm, and then rose at 10-40cm, but began to decrease in the 40-80 cm. In annual time scales, the soil moisture content was the key limiting factor of soil profile CO2 concentrations under different vegetation types, but in the daily time scale, the soil temperature was the main limiting factor. Furthermore, the root respiratory proportion of Caragana korshinskii and Artemisia ordosica communities was approximately 30.7% and 33.3%, respectively, at 0-80 cm from our study.

参考文献

[1] Shukla M K,Lal R.Air permeability of soils[C]//Lal R.Encyclopedia of Soil Science.New York,USA:Marcel Dekker,2006.
[2] Hansen J E,Lacis A A.Sun and dust versus greenhouse gases:an assessment of their relative roles in global climate change[J].Nature,1990,346(6286):713-719.
[3] Li X R,Wang X P,Li T,et al.Microbiotic soil crust and its effect on vegetation and habitat on artificially stabilized desert dunes in Tengger desert,North China[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2002,35:147-154.
[4] Trumbore S.Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems-recent progress and challenges[J].Global Change Biology,2006,12:141-153.
[5] 高艳红,张志山,刘立超,等.腾格里沙漠植被重建对土壤呼吸的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(4):626-633.
[6] 刘艳梅,李新荣,何明珠,等.生物土壤结皮对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(3):669-673.
[7] 高艳红,张志山,刘立超,等.水热因子对沙漠地区土壤呼吸的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(11):5996-6001.
[8] 靳虎甲,马全林,张有佳,等.石羊河下游白刺灌丛演替发育过程的土壤呼吸及其影响因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(1):140-147.
[9] 禹朴家,徐海量,王炜,等.沙丘不同部位土壤呼吸对人工降水的响应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):437-441.
[10] Bouma T J,Bryla D R.On the assessment of root and soil respiration for soils of different textures:interactions with soil moisture contents and soil CO2 concentrations[J].Plant and Soil,2000,227:215-221.
[11] 赵拥华,赵林,武天云,等.冬春季青藏高原北麓河多年冻土活动层中气体CO2浓度分布特征[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(2):183-190.
[12] 刁一伟,郑循华,王跃思,等.开放式空气CO2浓度增高条件下旱地土壤气体CO2浓度廓线测定[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(10):1249-1252.
[13] 戴万宏,王益权,黄耀,等.塿土剖面CO2浓度的动态变化及其受环境因素的影响[J].土壤学报,2004,41(5):170-175.
[14] 莫江明,方运霆,李德军,等.鼎湖山主要森林土壤CO2排放和CH4吸收特征[J].广西植物,2006,26(2):142-147.
[15] 张智才,刘峻杉,朱锴,等.内蒙古典型草原土壤不同剖面深度CO2通量格局及其驱动因子[J].生态环境,2008,17(5):2024-2030.
[16] 刘冰,赵文智,常学向,等.黑河流域荒漠区土壤水分对降水脉动响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):716-722.
[17] 黄磊,张志山,陈永乐.干旱人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态随机模拟[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):568-573.
[18] Hanson P J,Edwards N T,Garten C T,et al.Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration:a review of methods and observations[J].Biogeochemistry,2000,48:115-146.
[19] Irvine J,Law B E.Contrasting soil respiration in young and old-growth ponderosa pine forests[J].Global Change Biology,2002,8:1183-1194.
[20] Raich J W,Tufekcioglu A.Vegetation and soil respiration:correlations and controls[J].Biogeochemistry,2000,48:71-90.
[21] Bajracharya R M,Lai R,Kimble JM.Erosion effects on carbon dioxide concentration and carbon flux from an Ohio Alfisol[J].Soil Science Society American Journal,2000,64:694-700.
[22] Kammann C,Grunhage L,Jager H J.A new sampling technique to monitor concentration of CO2,CH4 and N2O in air at well-defined depths in soils with varied water potential[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2001,52:297-303.
[23] Grant R F,Rochette P.Soil microbial respiration at different water potentials and temperatures:theory and mathematical modeling[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1994,58:1681-1690.
[24] Smith K A,Ball T,Conen F,et al.Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere:Interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2003,54:779-791.
文章导航

/