img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生态与经济

基于生态系统服务价值变化的生态经济协调发展研究

  • 张学斌 ,
  • 石培基 ,
  • 罗君
展开
  • 1. 西北师范大学 地理与环境科学学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 甘肃农业大学 资源与环境学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
张学斌(1986- ),男,甘肃定西人,博士研究生,研究方向为区域发展与规划管理。Email:zhangxb428@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-01-01

  修回日期: 2013-01-23

  网络出版日期: 2014-01-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41271133,40971078)资助

Study on Ecology Economy Coordinating Development Based on the Changes of Ecosystem Service Value: A case of the Shiyanghe River Basin

  • Zhang Xuebin ,
  • Shi Peiji ,
  • Luo Jun
Expand
  • 1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. College of Resources and Environmental Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received date: 2013-01-01

  Revised date: 2013-01-23

  Online published: 2014-01-20

摘要

以1987年、2000年和2010年石羊河流域遥感影像数据为基础,对生态系统单位面积服务价值当量因子进行修正,结合生态经济协调度(EEH)评估模型对石羊河流域生态服务价值和经济发展与生态环境的协调发展水平进行了评估。结果表明:(1)研究区生态系统服务价值呈下降趋势,其损失主要集中在2000-2010年间;(2)生态系统服务价值增长的县(区)分布在流域中上游,降低的县(区)中,民勤县的损失量和下降幅度最大;(3)研究区的EEH值为-0.0174,生态经济发展总体上已处于低度冲突水平,在空间上,低度协调的县(区)主要分布在流域的上游和中游,而低度冲突的县(区)主要分布在流域的中下游;(4)各县(区)在协调发展水平上呈现出低度冲突-低度冲突、低度协调-低度协调、低度冲突-低度协调、低度协调-低度冲突、低度协调-中度冲突5种形式。

本文引用格式

张学斌 , 石培基 , 罗君 . 基于生态系统服务价值变化的生态经济协调发展研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014 , 34(1) : 268 -274 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00308

Abstract

Using the remote sensing image data of 1987, 2000 and 2010 in the Shiyanghe River Basin as the basic data and the ecology economic coordination degree evaluation model (EEH), we evaluated the coordinated level of economic development and ecological environment in the Shiyanghe River Basin with modified ecosystem service value equivalency factors per unit area. The results showed that: (1) ecosystem service value of the studied area presented a downward trend, and the losses of ecosystem service value were mainly concentrated in the phase of 2000-2010; (2) the counties with increased value of ecosystem services were distributed in the upstream of the basin, while among all the counties/districts with reduced values, the ecosystem service value of Minqin county declined the most; (3) the EEH value of the studied area was -0.0174, so the development level of ecological and economic was at a low conflict level, from the point view of spatial distribution, the counties/districts with low coordination degree were mainly distributed in the upstream and midstream of the basin, while those with low degree of conflict were mainly distributed in the downstream of the basin; (4) in the two phases of the studied area, there were five coordinate transformations: low-low conflict; low-low coordination; low conflict-low coordination; low coordination-low conflict; low coordination-moderate conflict.

参考文献

[1] 陆大道.中国地理学的发展与全球变化研究[J].地理学报,2011,66(2):147-156.
[2] Sutherland W J,Armstrong-Brown S,Armsworth P R,et al.The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,43:617-627.
[3] Daily G C.Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M].Washington,US:Island Press,1997.
[4] Costanza R,dArge R,de Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[5] Bennett E M,Peterson G D,Gordon L J.Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J].Ecology Letters,2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[6] Hector A,Bagchi R.Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality[J].Nature,2007,448:88-191.
[7] Egoh B,Reyers B,Rouget M.Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa[J].Biological Conservation,2009,142(3):553-562.
[8] Chapin Ⅲ F S,Carpenter S R,Kofinas G P,et al.Ecosystem stewardship:sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2009,25:241-249.
[9] 谭明亮,段争虎,陈小红,等.半干旱区城市人工森林生态系统服务价值评估——以兰州市南北两山环境绿化工程区为例[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(1):219-225.
[10] 孙慧兰,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.新疆伊犁河流域草地类型特征及其生态服务价值研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1273-1277.
[11] 孙新章,周海林,谢高地.中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(4):55-60.
[12] 欧阳志云,赵同谦,王效科,等.水生态服务功能分析及其间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(10):2092-2099.
[13] 张明阳,王克林,陈洪松,等.喀斯特生态系统服务功能遥感定量评估与分析[J].生态学报,2009,29(11):5891-5901.
[14] 王其翔,唐学玺.海洋生态系统服务的产生与实现[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2400-2406.
[15] 王春连,张镱锂,王兆锋,等.拉萨河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值变化[J].资源科学,2010,32(10):2038-2044.
[16] 姜立鹏,覃志豪,谢雯,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能价值遥感估算研究[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2):161-170.
[17] Feng X M,Fu B J,Yang X J,et al.Remote sensing of ecosystem services:an opportunity for spatially explicit assessment[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2010,20(6):522-535.
[18] 黄青,孙洪波,王让会,等.干旱区典型山地-绿洲-荒漠系统中绿洲土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(1):76-80.
[19] 王佳丽,黄贤金,陆汝成,等.区域生态系统服务对土地利用变化的脆弱性评估:以江苏省环太湖地区碳储量为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(4):556-563.
[20] 黄凤,吴世新,唐宏.基于遥感与GIS的新疆近18 a来LUCC的生态环境效应分析[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1486-1493.
[21] 陈忠升,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.基于生态服务价值的伊犁河谷土地利用变化环境影响评价[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):870-877.
[22] 李双成,刘金龙,张才玉,等.生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式[J].地理学报,2011,66(12):1618-1630.
[23] 马义娟,侯志华,徐晓莉.汾河上游土地利用变化对生态经济协调发展的影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(6):1803-1808.
[24] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23 (5):911-919.
[25] 苏飞,张平宇.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展评价——以大庆市为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):471- 477.
文章导航

/