img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生态与经济

基于CSCS改进CASA模型的中国草地净初级生产力模拟

  • 张美玲 ,
  • 蒋文兰 ,
  • 陈全功 ,
  • 柳小妮
展开
  • 1. 甘肃农业大学 理学院/数量生物学研究中心, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    3. 甘肃农业大学 草业学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    4. 兰州大学 草地农业科技学院, 甘肃 兰州 730020
张美玲(1978-),女,甘肃酒泉人,博士,副教授,主要从事草地生态学和数学模型研究。Email:zhangml@gsau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2013-05-12

  修回日期: 2013-07-31

  网络出版日期: 2014-07-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31160398);中国博士后科学基金项目(20100470887;2012T50828);教育部科学技术研究重点项目(211182);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1308RJZA262)资助

Estimation of Grassland Net Primary Production in China with Improved CASA Model Based on the CSCS

  • Zhang Meiling ,
  • Jiang Wenlan ,
  • Cheng Quangong ,
  • Liu Xiaoni
Expand
  • 1. Center for Quantitative Biology, College of Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. Cold and Arid Regions Environments and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    3. College of Prataculture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    4. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received date: 2013-05-12

  Revised date: 2013-07-31

  Online published: 2014-07-20

摘要

将草原综合顺序分类系统(CSCS)中的热量指标(∑θ)和湿润度指标(K)引入CASA模型。利用该模型模拟了2004-2008年中国41个草地类的净初级生产力(NPP),并分析了其时空变化和不同草地类NPP变化。结果表明:2004-2008年中国草地NPP模拟平均值与实测平均值分别为503.8 g·m-2·a-1和567.3 g·m-2·a-1,两者较为接近。各类草地的平均误差和平均相对误差均值分别为4.85 g·m-2·a-1和7.6%。草地NPP的实测值和模拟值相关性较好。改进CASA模型模拟值比Miami和Thornthwaite Memorial模型模拟值更接近实测值。NPP空间分布呈东高西低,南高北低,从西北向东南逐渐增加的趋势,体现了K和∑θ的水平和垂直地带性分布规律。2004-2008年中国草地NPP总体呈现增加趋势,其总量增加了23.0%。草地NPP年均值在不同植被类型中差异显著,分布规律与CSCS划分草地类的K和∑θ密切相关。总之,改进后的CASA模型模拟精度较高,实现了草地NPP模拟与草地分类的相互关联。

本文引用格式

张美玲 , 蒋文兰 , 陈全功 , 柳小妮 . 基于CSCS改进CASA模型的中国草地净初级生产力模拟[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014 , 34(4) : 1150 -1160 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00414

Abstract

In this study, >0 ℃ average annual cumulative temperature (∑θ) and moisture index (K) in grasslands comprehensive and sequential classification system (CSCS) were introduced into Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model. The net primary production (NPP) of 41 grassland classes in China from 2004 to 2008 was estimated by the improved model. In addition, the temporal and spatial variations of NPP and NPP variations of different grassland classes were analyzed. The results showed that the average values of estimation data of the improved model and the observed data were 503.8 g·-2·a-1and 567.3 g·m-2·a-1, indicating the difference between them was small. The mean error and mean relative error of 41 grassland classes were 4.85 g·m-2·a-1 and 7.6%. There were significant correlations between observed data and estimation data. The estimation data of the improved model was closer to the observed data than that of Miami model and Thornthwaite Memorial model. The grassland NPP in east was higher than that in west, and that in south was higher than that in north. It increased from Northwest China toward Southeast China, which may show the characteristic of horizontal and vertical distribution of ∑θ and K. The trend of grassland NPP in China from 2004 to 2008 was increased and it increased by 23% totally. The variations of annual average NPP in different grassland classes were significant in China from 2004 to 2008, which was consistent with the ∑θ and K for determining grassland class in CSCS. In conclusion, the precision of the improved CASA model is enough for the estimation of grassland NPP. The mutual relation of the classes in CSCS with the simulation of grassland NPP has been completed to a certain extent in this study.

参考文献

[1] Roxburgh S H,Berry S L,Buckley T N,et al.What is NPP?Inconsistent accounting of respiratory fluxes in the definition of net primary production[J].Functional Ecology,2005,19:378-382.
[2] Murakami K,Sasai T,Yamaguchi Y.A new one-dimensional simple energy balance and carbon cycle coupled model for global warming simulation[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2009,101(3/4):459-473.
[3] 周立华,朱艳玲,黄玉邦.禁牧政策对北方农牧交错区草地沙漠化逆转过程影响的定量评价[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):308-313.
[4] Scurlock J M O,Johnson K,Olson R J.Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements[J].Global Change Biology,2002,8:736-753.
[5] Potter C S,Randerson J T,Field C B,et al.Terrestrial ecosystem production:A process model based on global satellite and surface data[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1993,7:811-841.
[6] Field C B,Behrenfeld M J,Randerson J T,et al.Primary production of the biosphere:integrating terrestrial and oceanic components[J].Science,1998,281:237-240.
[7] Nayak R K,Patel N R,Dadhwal V K.Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2010,170(1/4):195-213.
[8] Xing X,Xu X,Zhang X.Simulating net primary production of grasslands in northeastern Asia using MODIS data from 2000 to 2005[J].Journal of Geography Science,2010,20(2):193-204.
[9] Liu S N,Zhou T,Wei L Y,et al.The spatial distribution of forest carbon sinks and sources in China[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2012,57(14):1699-1707.
[10] Chen Z Q,Shao Q Q,Liu J Y,et al.Analysis of net primary productivity of terrestrial vegetation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,based on MODIS remote sensing data[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2012,55:1306-1312.
[11] Ren J Z,Hu Z Z,Zhao J,et al.A grassland classification system and its application in China[J].The Rangeland Journal,2008,30:199-209.
[12] 任继周.分类、聚类与草原类型[J].草地学报,2008,16(1):4-10.
[13] Lin H L.A new model of grassland net primary productivity (NPP) based on the integrated orderly classification system of grassland[C].FSKD.The Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery,Tianjin,China:2009,1:52-56.
[14] 张美玲,陈全功,蒋文兰,等.基于草地综合顺序分类的改进CASA模型[J].中国草地学报,2011,33(4):5-11.
[15] Russell G,Jarvis P,Jarvis P.Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth[M]//Russell G,Jarvis P,Monteith J.Plant canopies:Their Growth,Form and Function.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1989:21-40.
[16] 张美玲,蒋文兰,陈全功,等.基于改进的CASA模型模拟草原综合顺序分类体系各类的最大光能利用率[J].草原与草坪,2012,32(4):60-66.
[17] Hope A,Boynton W,Stow D,et al.Inter-annual growth dynamics of vegetation in the Kuparuk River watershed based on the normalized difference vegetation index[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2003,24(17):3413-3425
[18] 罗天祥.中国主要森林类型生物生产力格局及其数学模型[D].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,1996.
[19] 朴世龙,方精云,贺金生,等.中国草地植被生物量及其空间分布格局[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4):491-498.
[20] Scurlock J M O,Cramer W,Olson R J,et al.Terrestrial NPP:Towards a consistent data set for global model evaluation[J].Ecological Applications,1999,9(3):913-919.
[21] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):413-424.
[22] 卢玲,李新,Veroustraete F.黑河流域植被净初级生产力的遥感估算[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(6):823-830.
[23] 陶波,李克让,邵雪梅,等.中国陆地净初级生产力时空特征模拟[J].地理学报,2003,58(3):372-380.
[24] Prince S D,Goward S N.Global primary production:A remote sensing approach[J].Journal of Biogeography,1995,22:815-835.
[25] 李贵才.基于MQDIS数据和光能利用率模型的中国陆地净初级生产力估算研究[D].北京:中国科学院遥感应用研究所,2004.
[26] 张锐,刘普幸,张克新.新疆草地气候生产潜力变化特征及对气候响应的预测研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(1):181-187.
[27] 陈斌,王绍强,刘荣高,等.中国陆地生态系统NPP模拟及空间格局分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(6):45-53.
[28] Tao B,Cao M K,Li K R,et al.Spatial pattern and variation of terrestrial ecosystem in China from 1981 to 2000[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2007,50(5):745-753.
[29] Piao S,Fang J,Chen A.Seasonal dynamics of terrestrial net primary production in response to climate changes in China[J].Acta Botanica Sinica,2003,45(3):269-275.
[30] Behrenfeld M J,Randerson J T,McClain C R,et al.Biospheric primary production during an ENSO transition[J].Science,2001,291(5513):2594-2597.
[31] Nemani R R,Keeling C D,Hashimoto H,et al.Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999[J].Science,2003,300:1560-1563.
[32] 张智全,黄高宝,李广.陇东耕地净第一性生产力与生态服务价值分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1516-1520.
文章导航

/