“十大孔兑”来沙造成黄河干流强烈淤积.为了通过流域治理来减轻泥沙灾害,研究“十大孔兑”侵蚀产沙过程具有重要意义.基于1960—2005年的河流输沙量、径流量和降雨量资料,运用统计方法进行了研究.结果表明:“十大孔兑”输沙量高度集中于几个大水大沙年份,其余年份对46年总输沙量的贡献很小.最大1年、最大3年、最大5年和最大10年的累积输沙量分别占到46年总输沙量的21.26%、37.18%、47.92%和69.29%.1960—1991年和1992—2005年两个时段相比,后一时段输沙量年均值减少了37%.这一差异可以用暴雨特征的差异和下垫面(如植被)的变化来解释.1991年以后,年降水量无明显变化,但最大1日降雨量在p<0.10的水平上呈现减小的趋势.虽然20世纪90年代西柳沟并未大规模实施水土保持治理,但由于农村富余劳动力转移,对土地的压力减轻,对植被的破坏大大减弱,使得植被逐渐恢复,NDVI呈增大趋势,因而侵蚀产沙减弱.“十大孔兑”产沙模数具有明显的空间分异特征,从西向东增大,在西柳沟达到最大值,然后再减小.流域自然地理因素具有明显的变化,从西向东,沙尘暴频率减小,降雨量增大.沙丘类型也发生了变化,由以流动沙丘为主变为以半固定沙丘为主,进入河道风沙的输沙强度减小.另一方面,水力驱动的侵蚀和泥沙输移从西向东增强.上述两种作用叠加的结果,在区域中部西柳沟附近出现了侵蚀产沙的峰值区.
Sediment supply from the ten small tributaries causes strong sedimentation in the upper Yellow River. For the purpose of reducing sediment-related disasters through soil erosion control measures in the ten small tributaries, we studied the soil erosion regularity in the ten small tributaries based on data of sediment load, runoff and precipitation from 1960 to 2005. The total sediment supply in the 46 years was highly concentrated in a few years with large sediment load and runoff, and the sediment yield from the remaining years made little contribution. The cumulative maximum 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year sediment yield accounts for 21.26%, 37.18%, 47.92% and 69.29% of the 46-year's total, respectively. Comparison with during1960-1991, the annual sediment yield from the Xiliugou River during 1992-2005 decreased by 37%. This difference can be explained by two factors, the difference in rainstorms and the variation of vegetation. After 1990, although annual precipitation shows no significant change, the maximum 1-day rainfall has a decreasing trend (p<0.10). The NDVI shows an increasing trend (p<0.01), which is caused by the transfer of surplus rural labors out of the land. The specific sediment yield shows clear spatial difference. In the ten small tributaries, it increases from west to east, reaching the maximum in the Xiliugou River, and then decreases. In the same direction, annual precipitation increases, the frequency of sand-dust storms decreases, and the types of sand dunes gradually change from movable to semi-fixed ones. Thus, the wind-blown sand to the rivers decreases, while the erosion and sediment transport by water increases. The superposing of these two processes leads to the occurrence of a peak of specific sediment yield near the Xiliugou River.
[1] 支俊峰,时明立.“89-7-21”十大孔兑区洪水泥沙淤堵黄河分析[M]//汪岗,范昭.黄河水沙变化研究第一卷(上册).郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002:460-471.
[2] 张原锋,王平,侯素珍,等.黄河上游干支流交汇区沙坝淤堵形成条件[J].水科学进展,2013,24(3):333-339.
[3] 杨根生,等.黄土高原地区北部风沙区土地沙漠化综合治理[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[4] 赵文林,程秀文,侯素珍.黄河上游宁蒙河段河道冲淤变化分析[J].人民黄河,1999,21(6):11-14.
[5] 杨根生.黄河石嘴山-河口镇河道淤积泥沙来源分析及治理对策[M].北京:海洋出版社,2002:1-90.
[6] 杨根生,拓万全,戴丰年,等.风沙对黄河内蒙古河段河道泥沙淤积的影响[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(2):152-159.
[7] 申冠卿,张原锋,侯素珍,等.黄河上游干流水库调节水沙对宁蒙河道的影响[J].泥沙研究,2007,(1):67-75.
[8] 侯素珍,王平,常温花,等.黄河内蒙古河段冲淤量评估[J].人民黄河,2007,29(4):21-22.
[9] 张晓华,郑艳爽,尚红霞.宁蒙河道冲淤规律及输沙特性研究[J].人民黄河,2008,30(11):42-44.
[10] 王海兵,贾晓鹏.大型水库运行下内蒙古河道泥沙侵蚀淤积过程[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):189-192.
[11] 刘晓燕,侯素珍,常温花.黄河内蒙古河段主槽萎缩原因和对策[J].水利学报,2009,40(9):1048-1054.
[12] 黄河水利科学研究院黄河干流水库调水调沙关键技术研究与龙羊峡、刘家峡水库运用方式调整研究课题组.黄河上游兰州至头道拐河段冲淤分析[R].郑州:黄河水利科学研究院,2008.
[13] 王兴奎,钱宁,胡维德.黄土丘陵沟壑区高含沙水流的形成及汇流过程[J].水利学报,1982,(2):26-35.
[14] 许炯心.黄河中游多沙粗沙区的风水两相侵蚀产沙过程[J].中国科学D辑(地球科学),2000,30(5):540-548.
[15] 杨勤业,袁宝印.黄土高原地区自然环境及其演变[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[16] 马玉凤,严平,李双权.内蒙古孔兑区叭尔洞沟中游河谷段的风水交互侵蚀动力过程[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(4):990-999.
[17] 张建,马翠丽,雷鸣,等.内蒙古十大孔兑水沙特性及治理措施研究[J].人民黄河,2013,35(10):72-74.
[18] 许炯心.风水两相作用和高含沙水流对“十大孔兑”侵蚀产沙的影响[J].泥沙研究,2013,(6):28-37.
[19] 黄河水利科学研究院.黄河河情咨询报告(2006)[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2009.
[20] 赵昕,汪岗,韩学士.内蒙古十大孔兑水土流失危害及治理对策[J].中国水土保持,2001,(3):4-6.