多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)根、冠构型的年龄差异及其适应意义

李尝君; 郭京衡; 曾凡江; 热甫开提; 郭自春

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00015

中国沙漠 >

2015 , Vol. 35 >Issue 2: 365 - 372

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00015

生物与土壤

多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)根、冠构型的年龄差异及其适应意义

李尝君 ,
郭京衡 ,
曾凡江 ,
热甫开提 ,
郭自春

展开

1. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所新疆策勒荒漠草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站/干旱区生物地理与生物资源重点实验室/荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 新疆大学资源与环境科学学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830046

李尝君(1987-), 男, 湖南人, 博士研究生, 主要从事干旱区植物生态研究。Email: ricroot@sina.com

收稿日期: 2013-12-30

修回日期: 2014-01-24

网络出版日期: 2015-03-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金委员会-新疆维吾尔自治区人民政府联合基金重点项目(U1203201)

收起

Shoot and Root Architectural Variance and Adaptability of Tamarix ramosissima in Different Ages

Li Changjun ,
Guo Jingheng ,
Zeng Fanjiang ,
Refkat ,
Guo Zichun

Expand

1. Cele National Field Science Observation and Research Station of Desert Grassland Ecosystem/Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land/State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China

Received date: 2013-12-30

Revised date: 2014-01-24

Online published: 2015-03-20

Fold

摘要

根、冠构型差异是植物研究中容易被忽视的环节,但其在植物适应环境的过程中扮演着重要角色。对不同林龄多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)根、冠构型参数的调查研究表明:(1)不同林龄多枝柽柳冠层构型有较大的差异,幼年阶段多枝柽柳小枝分枝率和一级分支长度较小,各级分支直径较大,体现了其适应强风、干旱环境的可塑性变化; (2)随着林龄的增加,多枝柽柳分支率、根系连接长度、各级根系长度和直径明显增加,说明不同生长阶段多枝柽柳通过权衡碳消耗和碳分配采取不同的干旱适应策略,进而导致不同生长阶段干旱适应能力的差异; (3)不同林龄多枝柽柳根系拓扑结构参数无明显差异,均接近鲱鱼骨状分布,但根系连接长度差异显著,体现了其干旱适应能力的差异。

关键词： 冠层构型; 根系构型; 根系拓扑结构; 环境适应性; 分支结构

本文引用格式

李尝君 , 郭京衡 , 曾凡江 , 热甫开提 , 郭自春 . 多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)根、冠构型的年龄差异及其适应意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015 , 35(2) : 365 -372 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00015

Abstract

Although the importance of plant architecture was underscored on plants adaptation to environment, little attention was paid on it while doing plant research. Here, field sampling and investigation were taken to show both the shoot and root architectural plasticity of Tamarix ramosissima of different ages. The results showed that T. ramosissima of different ages performed significant differences on shoot and root structure. Young individuals possessed smaller branch bifurcation ratio, shorter first order branch and coarser branch diameter which benefitted to their adaption to drought and wind stress. The root bifurcation ratio, average linking length, length and diameter of different orders increased significantly by ages, suggesting that there's a certain tradeoff of carbon consumption and distribution strategy among T. ramosissima individuals of different ages. Roots of all T. ramosissima individuals formed a herringbone pattern, and the topological parameters of T. ramosissima in different age didn't differ much.

Key words： shoot architecture; root architecture; root topology; environment adaptation; bifurcation structure

参考文献

[1] Fitter A H,Stickland T R,Harvey M L,et al.Architectural analysis of plant root systems.I.Architectural correlates of exploitation efficiency[J].New Phytologist,1991,118:375-382.
[2] 陈波,达良俊.栲树不同生长发育阶段的枝系特征分析[J].武汉植物学研究,2003,(3):226-231.
[3] 何明珠,王辉,张景光.民勤荒漠植物枝系构型的分类研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,(9):1827-1832.
[4] 屈志强,刘连友,吕艳丽.沙生植物构型及其与抗风蚀能力关系研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2011,(2):357-362.
[5] Fisher J B.Branching patterns and angles in trees[M]//Givnish T J.On the Economy of Plant Form and Function.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1986:493-523.
[6] Pearcy R W,Valladares F,Wright S J,et al.A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species:do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth?[J].Oecologia,2004,139(2):163-177.
[7] Greer D H,Weston C,Weedon M.Shoot architecture,growth and development dynamics of Vitis vinifera cv.Semillon vines grown in an irrigated vineyard with and without shade covering[J].Functional Plant Biology,2010,37(11):1061-1070.
[8] Kuppers,M.Ecological significance of aboveground architectural patterns in woody plants:a question of cost-benefit relationships [J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1989,4(12):375-379.
[9] 陈波,宋永昌,达良俊.木本植物的构型及其在植物生态学研究的进展[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(3):28,52-56.
[10] Fitter A H,Stickland T R.Architectural analysis of plant root systems.II.influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species[J].New Phytologist,1991,118:383-389.
[11] Fitter A H,Williamson L,Linkohr B,et al.Root system architecture determines fitness in an Arabidopsis mutant in competition for immobile phosphate ions but not for nitrate ions[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B,2002,269:2017-2022.
[12] Lynch J.Root architecture and plant productivity[J].Plant Physiology,1995,109(1):7.
[13] Kull O,Tulva I.Shoot structure and growth along a vertical profile within a Populus Tilia canopy[J].Tree Physiology,2002,22(15/16):1167-1175.
[14] 何明珠,张景光,王辉.荒漠植物枝系构型影响因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2006,(4):625-630.
[15] Hodge A,Berta G,Doussan C,et al.Plant root growth,architecture and function[J].Plant and Soil,2009,321(1/2):153-187.
[16] Tsakaldimi M,Tsitsoni T,Ganatsas P,et al.A comparison of root architecture and shoot morphology between naturally regenerated and container-grown seedlings of Quercus ilex[J].Plant and soil,2009,324(1/2):103-113.
[17] Berntson G M.Topological scaling and plant root system architecture:developmental and functional hierarchies[J].New Phytologist,1997,135(4):621-634.
[18] Pearcy R W,Valladares F.Resource acquisition by plants:the role of crown architecture[M]//Press M G,Scholes J D,Barker M G.Plant Physiological Ecology.Oxford,UK:Blackwell Scientific,1999:45-66.
[19] Niinemets V,Kull O.Effects of light availability and tree size on the architecture of assimilative surface in the canopy of Picea abies:variation in needle morphology[J].Tree Physiology,1995,15(5):307-315.
[20] 孙书存,陈灵芝.辽东栎植冠的构型分析[J].植物生态学报,1999,(5):433-440.
[21] 肖锐,李凤日,刘兆刚.樟子松人工林分枝结构的分析[J].植物研究,2006,(4):490-496.
[22] 曾凡江,刘波.骆驼刺根系生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[23] 李向义,张希明,何兴元,等.绿洲前沿地区多枝柽柳水分关系的特征及灌溉的影响[J].植物生态学报,2004,(5):644-650.
[24] 曾凡江,郭海峰,刘波,等.多枝柽柳和疏叶骆驼刺幼苗生物量分配及根系分布特征[J].干旱区地理,2010,(1):59-64.
[25] Steingraeber D A,Waller D M.Non-stationary of tree branching pattern and bifurcation ratios[J].Proceedings of Royal Society of London B,1986,228:187-194.
[26] Berntson G M.The characterization of topology:a comparison of four topological indices for rooted binary trees[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1995,177(3):271-281.
[27] Oppelt A L,Kurth W,Godbold D L.Topology,scaling relations and Leonardo's rule in root systems from African tree species[J].Tree Physiology,2001,21:117-128.
[28] 杨小林,张希明,李义玲,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地3种植物根系构型及其生境适应策略[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1268-1276.
[29] Vercambre G,Pagès L,Doussan C,et al.Architectural analysis and synthesis of the plum tree root system in an orchard using a quantitative modelling approach[J].Plant and Soil,2003,251:1-11.
[30] Sprugel D G,Hinckley T M,Schaap W.The theory and practice of branch autonomy[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1991,22:309-334.
[31] 公维昌,庄丽,赵文勤,等.多枝柽柳与梭梭光合器官形态解剖结构的生态适应性[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):129-136.
[32] Gilman E F.Branch-to-stem diameter ratio affects strength of attachment[J].Journal of Arboriculture,2003,29(5):291-294.
[33] 王丽娟,孙栋元,赵成义,等.准噶尔盆地梭梭、白梭梭植物构型特征[J].生态学报,2011,17:4952-4960.
[34] 张丹,李传荣,许景伟,等.沙质海岸黑松分枝格局特征及其抗风折能力分析[J].植物生态学报,2011,(9):926-936.
[35] Glimskar A.Estimates of root system topology of five plant species grown at steady-state nutrition[J].Plant and Soil,2000,227:249-256.
[36] Martinez-Sanchez J J,Ferrandis P,Trabaud L,et al.Comparative root system structure of post-fire Pinus halepensis Mill.and Cistus monspeliensis L.saplings[J].Plant Ecology,2003,168:309-320.
[37] 单立山,李毅,董秋莲,等.红砂根系构型对干旱的生态适应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1283-1290.
[38] 马献发,宋凤斌,张继舟.根系对土壤环境胁迫响应的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,(5):44-48.
[39] Vamerali T,Saccomani M,Bona S,et al.A comparison of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids[M]//Roots:The Dynamic Interface between Plants and the Earth.Netherlands:Springer,2003:157-167.
[40] Bouma T J,Yanai R D,Elkin A D,et al.Estimating age-dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span:comparing apples and oranges[J].New Phytologist,2001,150(3):685-695.
[41] Thomas C W,Erik V E and Jonathan P L.Modeling applicability of fractal analysis to efficiency of soil exploration by roots[J].Annals of Botany,2004,94:119-128.
[42] Eissenstat D M,Wells C E,Yanai R D,et al.Building roots in a changing environment:implications for root longevity[J].New Phytologist,2000,147(1):33-42.
[43] 杨小林,张希明,李义玲,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地几种植物根系分形特征[J].干旱区地理,2009,32(2):249-254.
[44] Berntson G M.Modelling root architecture:are there tradeoffs between efficiency and potential of resource acquisition?[J].New Phytologist,1994,127:483-493.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献