从农户可持续生计框架出发,以河西走廊六县为调研对象,建立了农户生计指标体系并对其进行评估,从而揭示了当地农户生计资本与生计策略之间的影响关系。结果表明:(1)无论是项目组还是对照组,农户的5种生计资本整体比较稀缺,其中自然资本和金融资本极度匮乏,而人力资本、社会资本和物质资本相对较丰富,因此农户生计资本单一且配置极不合理,从而导致农户脆弱性程度高。(2)自然资本、人力资本和物质资本对农户生计策略的影响比较显著,其中自然资本和物质资本丰富的农户往往倾向于选择农业生产,而人力资本丰富的农户往往倾向于选择非农产业。(3)经定量评估对照组农户的农业兼业化程度要比项目组农户高。基于此,政府可以采取诸多措施来改善农户的生计现状,从而提升农户的生计水平,进一步转变当地农业的发展模式,缓解生态压力。
From farmers' sustainable livelihoods framework, we took the Hexi Corridor six counties as investigation object, and established the farmers' livelihood index system for quantitative analysis, which revealed the impact of the relationship between the livelihood assets and strategies. The results showed that: (1)Whether the project group or the control group, the five farmers livelihood assets relatively scared, particular the natural and financial assets were extremely scarce, so the allocation of farmers livelihood assets were unreasonable, resulting in a high degree of farmers' vulnerability. (2)The natural assets, the human assets and the physical assets were significant to farmers' livelihood strategies, including the farmers of the natural and physical assets-rich tended to select agricultural production, and the farmers of the human assets-rich tended to select non-agricultural industries. (3)The degree of industry and agriculture, the farmers in the control group were higher than the project group's. Based on these, the government could take many measures to improve the farmers' livelihood assets, achieve diversification of farmers' livelihood, enhance the level of farmers' livelihood, and further change the development model of local agriculture and ease the pressure on the local ecology.
[1] Scoones I.Sustainable Rural Livelihoods:A Framework for Analysis[R].Brighton,UK:Institute of Development Studies,1998.
[2] Ellis F.Rural Livelihood and Diversity in Developing Countries[M].New York,USA:Oxford University Press,2000:24-78.
[3] Roberts M G,杨国安.可持续发展研究方法国际进展-脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J].地理科学进展, 2003,22(1):11-21.
[4] 阎建忠,吴莹莹,张镱锂,等.青藏高原东部样带农牧民生计的多样化[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2010,20(5):757-770.
[5] 韦惠兰,冯茹,范文安.生态补偿与林缘社区的可持续生计——以甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区为例[J].农村经济,2008(4):62-65.
[6] 杨云彦,赵锋.可持续生计分析框架下农户生计资本的调查与分析——以南水北调(中线)工程库区为例[J].农业经济问题,2009(3):58-65.
[7] 黎洁,李亚莉,邰秀军,等.可持续生计分析框架下西部贫困退耕山区农户生计状况分析[J].中国农村观察,2009(5):29-38.
[8] 李树茁,梁义成.退耕还林政策对农户生计的影响研究——基于家庭结构视角的可持续生计分析[J].公共管理学报,2010(2):1-10.
[9] 苏芳,徐中民,尚海洋.可持续生计分析研究综述[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(1):61-69.
[10] 李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007(4):32-39.
[11] 蒙吉军,刘洋,向芸芸.农牧户可持续生计资产与生计策略的关系研究——以鄂尔多斯市乌审旗为例[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2013,3(2):321-328.
[12] Sharp K.Measuring Destitution:Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in the Analysis of Survey Data[R].IDS Working Paper.2003:217-233.
[13] 郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(12):98-102.
[14] 陶晓燕,章仁俊,徐辉,等.基于改进熵值法的城市可持续发展能力的评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(5):38-41.
[15] 叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:19-30.
[16] 王济川,郭志刚.Logistic回归模型方法及应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:6-19.
[17] 苏芳,蒲欣冬,徐中民.生计资本与生计策略关系研究——以张掖市甘州区为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009,19(6):119-125.