img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生态与经济

补偿标准参照的比较:机会成本与环境收益——以石羊河流域生态补偿为例

  • 尚海洋 ,
  • 丁杨 ,
  • 张志强
展开
  • 1. 兰州财经大学, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心, 四川 成都 610000
尚海洋(1981-),男,辽宁沈阳人,副教授,博士,主要从事生态经济和区域经济方面的研究。E-mail:haiyangshang@sina.cn

收稿日期: 2015-01-08

  修回日期: 2015-02-12

  网络出版日期: 2016-05-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41171116,41201595,41401653)

The Comparison of the Opportunity Cost and Environmental Benefits for Ecological Compensation Standards: a case study in the Shiyanghe River Basin

  • Shang Haiyang ,
  • Ding Yang ,
  • Zhang Zhiqiang
Expand
  • 1. Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. Chengdu Center for Documentation and Information, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610000, China

Received date: 2015-01-08

  Revised date: 2015-02-12

  Online published: 2016-05-20

摘要

流域生态补偿是当前生态经济研究的热点问题。在简要说明流域内生态系统服务与流域生态补偿的关系之后,从理论上分析了流域生态补偿标准的环境收益参照——机会成本变为环境收益,并以石羊河流域生态恢复目标为例开展实证,在考虑补偿总预算约束下,比较采用两种补偿标准参照生态补偿机制运行的效果。结果表明:采用环境收益代替机会成本作为补偿标准参照,对于提高农户参与生态补偿的积极性、保护生态系统服务行为的约束性作用明显;引入以机会成本与环境收益比值确定的优先补偿指标,在生态补偿资金预算约束下替代机制对完成既定生态恢复目标有显著促进作用。

本文引用格式

尚海洋 , 丁杨 , 张志强 . 补偿标准参照的比较:机会成本与环境收益——以石羊河流域生态补偿为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016 , 36(3) : 830 -835 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00062

Abstract

Ecological compensation is the current hot issue of ecological economics research. Based on the brief description of the relationship between watershed ecosystem services and ecological compensation, this paper analyzes the reference of watershed environmental benefits of the ecological compensation standard, just transform of the opportunity cost into environmental benefits. Taking ecological restoration goals in the Shiyanghe River Basin as an example to carry out empirical analysis, in considering the compensation of the total budget constraints, we compare the effect of two different compensation standards for ecological compensation mechanism. The result shows that using the environmental benefits instead of the opportunity cost as the compensation standards has obvious effort in improving the enthusiasm of farmer participation in ecological and binding of the act of protecting ecosystem service. The introduction of the priorities compensation indicator that identified by the ratio of opportunity cost and environmental benefits has significant promotion effort to achieve ecological restoration goals at an alternative mechanisms which has ecological compensation capital budget constraint.

参考文献

[1] 李博,石培基,金淑婷,等.石羊河流域生态系统服务价值的空间异质性及其计量[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(3) :943-951.
[2] Pagiola S,Platais G.Introduction to Payments for Environmental Services[R].World Bank,2005.
[3] 尚海洋,苏芳,徐中民,等.生态补偿的研究进展及其启示[J].冰川冻土,2011,33(6):1435-1443.
[4] 刘力,冯起.流域生态补偿研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(3):808-813.
[5] 马兵,周立华,路慧玲,等.基于意愿价值评估法的禁牧政策生态补偿定量分析——以宁夏盐池县为例[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(3):800-807.
[6] Fernandez S.Payments for Environmental Services (PES) and Water:Some Opportunities to Help Farmers?[R] National School of Rural,Water and Forestry Engineering,2008.
[7] 张学斌,石培基,罗君.基于生态系统服务价值变化的生态经济协调发展研究——以石羊河流域为例[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(1):268-274.
[8] World Bank.Payments for Ecological Services[OL/EB].http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/ESSD/essdext.nsf/44DocByUnid/1938A989_CDB7F9C385256B500063D62D?Opendocument.
[9] Alix-Garcia J.Payment for environmental services in agricultural landscapes[J].Natural Resource Management and Policy,2009,31:163-188.
[10] Antle J M,Valdivia R O.Modeling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture:a minimum data approach[J].The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2006,50(1):12-15.
[11] Dupaz P.The environmental supply of farm households:a flexible willingness to accept model[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25(2):171-189.
[10] Wu J.Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,82(4):979-992.
[13] 郭承录,李发明.石羊河流域生态系统存在的问题及治理对策[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):608-613.
[14] 徐中民,李兴文.甘肃省典型地区生态补偿机制研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2011.
文章导航

/