img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生物与土壤

地下水埋深对胡杨(Populus euphratica)、柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)气孔响应水汽压亏缺敏感度的影响

  • 吴桂林 ,
  • 蒋少伟 ,
  • 王丹丹 ,
  • 周天河 ,
  • 李君
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所 荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
吴桂林(1990-),男,湖北黄冈人,硕士研究生,主要从事群落生态学研究。E-mail:974341380@qq.com

收稿日期: 2015-04-29

  修回日期: 2015-07-07

  网络出版日期: 2016-09-20

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2013CB429903);国家自然科学基金项目(41171037,41171095)

Stomatal Sensitivity to Leaf-to-air Vapor Pressure Deficit of Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima under Contrasting Groundwater Conditions

  • Wu Guilin ,
  • Jiang Shaowei ,
  • Wang Dandan ,
  • Zhou Tianhe ,
  • Li Jun
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011 China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2015-04-29

  Revised date: 2015-07-07

  Online published: 2016-09-20

摘要

通过调节LI-6400光合测定系统叶室内相对湿度,测定了高地下水埋深和无地下水条件下胡杨(Populus euphratica)、柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)叶片气孔导度(Gs)对水汽压亏缺(LVPD)变化的响应,并线性拟合得到GsLVPD响应的敏感度。结果表明:高地下水埋深条件下,胡杨GsLVPD的敏感度显著高于柽柳(P<0.05),无地下水条件下两物种GsLVPD的敏感度差异不显著(P>0.05);高地下水埋深条件下胡杨GsLVPD的敏感度高于无地下水条件(P<0.05),柽柳则差异不显著(P>0.05)。胡杨高地下水埋深条件下较高的气孔敏感度说明该物种在有利水分条件下水分利用偏于保守。无地下水条件下柽柳气孔敏感度基本不变,Gs下降幅度较小,而胡杨气孔敏感度与Gs均大幅度下降,两物种净光合速率(Pn)呈现相应变化,表明胡杨Pn更容易受环境水分亏缺的约束,在植物-水分关系层面柽柳表现出对水分条件多变、大气蒸腾压力高的荒漠河岸生境更优的适应能力。

本文引用格式

吴桂林 , 蒋少伟 , 王丹丹 , 周天河 , 李君 . 地下水埋深对胡杨(Populus euphratica)、柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)气孔响应水汽压亏缺敏感度的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016 , 36(5) : 1296 -1301 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00117

Abstract

Using portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400),we measured leaf conductance of Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima grown under conditions with high groundwater and without groundwater availability to explore their stomatal sensitivity in response to changes in leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit (LVPD), which were obtained by regulating the relative humidity in the chamber in our experiment. Stomatal sensitivity to LVPD was calculated by fitting the linear relationship between stomatal conductance(Gs)and ln-transformed LVPD. The results indicate that the stomatal sensitivity to LVPD for P. euphratica was significant higher than T. ramosissima under high groundwater availability while similar under no groundwater condition. Under no groundwater condition, P. euphratica showed significantly reduced stomatal sensitivity to LVPD, while similar for T. ramosissima, in comparison to high groundwater condition. Thus the higher stomatal sensitivity to LVPD under high groundwater condition indicates that P. euphratica is relatively conservative in water use when environmental water supply is favorable. In contrast, T. ramosissima exhibited an inert stomatal response to LVPD, a small reduction in Gs and a parallel Pn when no groundwater was available, which suggest that P. euphratica is more susceptible to environmental water deficit, and from a perspective of plant-water relation, T. ramosissima exhibits advantages in adapting to the desert riparian zones characterized by highly variable water environment and great transpirational demand.

参考文献

[1] Oren R,Phillips N,Ewers B E,et al.Sap-flux-scaled transpiration responses of light,vapor pressure deficit,and leaf area reduction in a flooded Taxodium distichum forest[J].Tree Physiology,1999,19(6):337-347.
[2] 李炜,司建华,冯起,等.胡杨(Populus euphratica)蒸腾耗水对水汽压差的响应[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1377-1384.
[3] Buckley T N.The control of stomata by water balance[J].New Phytologist,2005,168(2):275-291.
[4] Körner C,Bannister P.Stomatal response to humidity in Nothofagus menziesii[J].New Zealand Journal of Botany,1985,23(3):425-429.
[5] Richter H,Wagner S B.Water Stress Resistance of Photosynthesis:Some Aspects of Osmotic Relations[M].The Hagure,Martinus Nijhoff/Junk,1983:45-53.
[6] New M,Lister D,Hulme M,et al.A high-resolution data of surface climate over global land areas[J].Climate Research,2002,21(1):1-25.
[7] Naiman R J,Décamps H.The ecology of interfaces:riparian zones[J].Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,1997,28(1):621-658.
[8] Zhang Y M,Chen Y N,Pan B R.Distribution and floristics of desert plant communities in the lower reaches of Tarim River[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2005,63(4):772-784.
[9] Li J,Yu B,Zhao C Y,et al.Physiological and morphological responses of Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica to altered groundwater availability[J].Tree physiology,2012,33(1):57-68.
[10] 韩路,王海珍,周正立,等.塔里木河上、中游胡杨种群结构与统计分析[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):1315-1322.
[11] 陈亚鹏,陈亚宁,徐长春,等.塔里木河下游地下水埋深对胡杨气体交换和叶绿素荧光的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(2):344-353.
[12] 李菊艳,赵成义,孙栋元,等.水分对胡杨幼苗光合及生物特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(7):1445-1451.
[13] 解婷婷,张希明,单立山,等.灌溉量对多枝柽柳水分生理及生长的影响[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(6):802-807.
[14] Cleverly J R,Smith S D,Sala A,et al.Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave Desert floodplain,the role of drought[J].Oecologia,1997,111(1):12-18.
[15] Chesson P,Gebauer R L E,Schwinning S,et al.Resource pulses,species interactions,and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments[J].Oecologia,2004,141(2):236-253.
[16] 邓潮洲,李利,吴俊侠,等.塔里木河上游胡杨群落及种群特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(6):1381-1388.
[17] Lohammar T,Larsson S,Lnders S,et al.Simulation models of gaseous exchange in Scots pine[J].Ecological Bulletins,1980,32(1):505-523.
[18] 曾凡江,张希明,李向义,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘柽柳和胡杨水势的季节变化研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1389-1393.
[19] Oren R,Sperry J S,Katul G G,et al.Survey and synthesis of intra-and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,1999,22(12):1515-1526.
[20] EI-Sharkaway M E,Cock J H.Water use efficiency of Cassava.I.Effects of air humidity and water stress on stomatal conductance and gas exchange[J].Crop Science,1984,24(3):497-502.
[21] Cunningham S C.Stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit of temperate and tropical evergreen rainforest of Australia[J].Trees,2004,18(4):399-407.
[22] Ocheltree T W,Nippert J B,Prasad P V V.Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific difference in hydraulic conductance[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2013,37(1):132-139.
[23] 丁俊祥,邹杰,唐立松,等.克里雅河流域荒漠-绿洲交错带3种不同生活型植物的光合特性[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):1-12.
[24] Ludlow M M.Adaptive Significance of Stomatal Responses to Water Stress[M].New York,USA:Wiley,1980:123-138.
[25] Ewers B E,Oren R,Sperry J S.Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2000,23(10):1055-1066.
[26] Sher A A,Marshall D L.Seedlings competition between native Populus deltoides(Salicaceae) and exotic Tamarix ramosissima(Tamaricaceae) across water regimes and substrate types[J].American Journal of Botany,2003,90(3):413-422.
[27] Farquhar G D.Models describing the kinetics of ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase[J].Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics,1979,193(1):456-468.
[28] Stromberg J C,Beauchamp V B,Dixon M D,et al.Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid south-western United States[J].Freshwater Biology,2007,52(4):651-679.
文章导航

/