img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生物与土壤

毛乌素沙地丘间低地植物群落分类与排序

  • 朱媛君 ,
  • 张璞进 ,
  • 邢娜 ,
  • 闫颖超 ,
  • 清华 ,
  • 赵利清
展开
  • 1. 内蒙古大学 生态与环境学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010021;
    2. 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010030;
    3. 鄂尔多斯市农牧业局, 内蒙古 鄂尔多斯 017000
朱媛君(1992-),男,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,硕士研究生,主要从事植被生态学研究工作。E-mail:neidazhuyuanjun@163.com

收稿日期: 2015-09-06

  修回日期: 2015-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2016-11-20

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2013M541211);内蒙古自然科学基金面上项目(2013MS0509);内蒙古自然科学基金重大项目(2014ZD02);国家自然科学基金项目(31300360);内蒙古农牧业科学院青-创新基金项目(2013QNJJM12)

Classification and Ordination Analysis of Plant Communities in Inter-dune Lowland in the Mu Us Sandy Land

  • Zhu Yuanjun ,
  • Zhang Pujin ,
  • Xing Na ,
  • Yan Yingchao ,
  • Qing Hua ,
  • Zhao Liqing
Expand
  • 1. School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
    2. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010030, China;
    3. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau of Ordos, Ordos 017000, Inner Mongolia, China

Received date: 2015-09-06

  Revised date: 2015-11-11

  Online published: 2016-11-20

摘要

为研究植物群落分布格局与环境因子间的相互关系,在群落样方调查的基础上,对毛乌素沙地丘间低地植被复合体的主要植物群落进行TWINSPAN分类和PCA排序,对土壤环境因子进行DCCA排序。结果表明:调查区内53个物种分属21科46属,其中菊科(Compositae,11种)、禾本科(Gramineae,7种)、莎草科(Cyperaceae,7种)、豆科(Leguminosae,5种)、藜科(Chenopodiaceae,4种)等科所含物种数较多,分别占20.8%、13.2%、13.2%、9.4%、7.5%,生活型以多年生草本为主,水分生态类型以中生植物为主。应用TWINSPAN将67个样方划分为17个组,依据《中国植被》的分类原则和系统确定为21个群丛。对PCA排序的第一轴起主要作用的是以北沙柳(Salix psammophila)、假苇拂子茅(Calamagrostis pseudophragmites)和碱茅(Puccinelia distans)为建群种的群落,对第二轴起主要作用的是以寸草苔(Carex duriuscula)为建群种的群落。植物群落分布DCCA排序第一轴主要与地下水位、HCO3-含量负相关,与土壤粗砂粒正相关;第二轴主要与土壤Ca2+、K+和Na+含量正相关,与土壤容重负相关;其中地下水位和土壤Ca2+、K+和Na+含量是环境因子中影响丘间低地植物群落特征和分布的主要因子。

关键词: 毛乌素沙地; DCCA; PCA; 分类; 排序

本文引用格式

朱媛君 , 张璞进 , 邢娜 , 闫颖超 , 清华 , 赵利清 . 毛乌素沙地丘间低地植物群落分类与排序[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016 , 36(6) : 1580 -1589 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00171

Abstract

Aiming to well understand the relationship between environmental factors and the structure and distribution pattern of plant communities in inter-dune lowland of the Mu Us Sandy Land, this study took vegetation complex of inter-dune lowland in the Mu Us Sandy Land as research object and made a classification and ordination analysis to plant community using the two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and principal component analysis (PCA), and detrended canonical correspondence analysis (DCCA) to soil environment factors based on field plant community investigation. The results showed that there were 53 plant species which were classified into 21 families and 46 genera. The dominant families were Compositae (11 species), Gramineae (7 species), Cyperaceae (7 species), Leguminosae (5 species), and Chenopodiaceae (4 species), which respectively accounted for 20.8%, 13.2%, 13.2%, 9.4% and 7.5% of total species amount. Perennial herbages and mesophyte were the most abundant ecotype. The 67 investigated plant community quadrates were divided into 17 groups by TWINSPAN, and finally determined as 21 associations according to the community characteristics. The PCA analysis showed that the first ordinate axis mainly expressed the communities dominated by Salix psammophila, Calamagrostis pseudophragmites and Puccinellia tenuiflora, and the second ordinate axis mainly expressed the communities dominated by Carex duriuscula. The DCCA ordination indicated that the main ecological factors that affected the distribution of plant associations were ground water level and soil Ca2+, K+ and Na+ content. Our results will provide scientific basis for reasonable management, utilization and restoration of inter-dune lowland pasture of the Mu Us Sandy Land.

参考文献

[1] 袁宏波,吴春荣,刘虎俊,等.干旱内陆沙区丘间地研究现状及存在问题[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(8):2245-2254.
[2] Grootjans A P,Ernst W H O,Stuyfzand P J.European dune slacks:strong interactions of biology,pedogenesis and hydrology[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1998,13:96-100.
[3] Bossuyt B,Honnay O,Hermy M.An island biogeographical view of the successional pathway in wet dune slacks[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2003.14:781-788.
[4] Lammerts E J,Pegtel D M,Grootjans A,et al.Nutrient limitation and vegetation changes in a coastal dune slack[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,1999,10:111-122.
[5] Grootjans A P,Geelen H W T,Jansen A J M,et al.Restoration of coastal dune slacks in the Netherlands[J].Hydrobiologia,2002,478:181-203.
[6] Dech J P,Maun M A.Zonation of vegetation along a burial gradient on the leeward slopes of Lake Huron sand dunes[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,2005,83:227-236.
[7] Nordstrom K F,Lampe R,Vandemark L M.Reestablishing naturally functioning dunes on developed coasts[J].Environmental Management,2000,25:37-51.
[8] Pegman A P M,Rap son G L.Plant succession and dune dynamics on actively prograding dunes,Whatipu Beach,northern New Zealand[J].New Zealand Journal of Botany,2005,43:223-244.
[9] 刘海江,郭柯.浑善达克沙地丘间低地植物群落的分类与排序[J].生态学报,2003,23(10):2163-2169.
[10] 李得禄,满多清,朱国庆,等.丘间低地不同部位风沙流结构特征[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1210-1215.
[11] 呼格吉勒图.毛乌素沙地湿地植被特征与生态功能[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2012.
[12] 朱震达,吴正,刘恕,等.中国沙漠概论[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.
[13] 中国科学院内蒙古宁夏综合考察队.内蒙古植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.
[14] 张琳,杨劼,呼格吉勒图,等.水位梯度对毛乌素沙地柳湾林群落特征影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1296-1300.
[15] 宋永昌.植被生态学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
[16] Zhang J T.Analysis of relationships between vegetation and it's environmental variables I.DCA ordination[J].Journal of Shanxi University:Natural Science Edition,1992,15(2):182-189.
[17] Zhang J T.Ordination axes partitioning and its application[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,1994,13(3):73-75.
[18] Zhang J T.Methods in Quantitative Vegetation Ecology[M].Beijing:Chinese Scientific & Technological Press,1995.
[19] Zhang F,Zhang J T.Research progress of numerical classification and ordination of vegetation in China[J].Journal of Shanxi University:Natural Science Edition,2000,23(3):278-282.
[20] Lou A R.Ecological gradient analysis and environmental interpretation of mountain vegetation in the middlest retch of Tian Shan Mountain[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1998,22(4):364-372.
[21] Li Y Y.The multivariate analysis methods applying in the domain of ecology[J].Journal of Guizhou University:Agriculture and Biological Science,2002,21(3):215-218.
[22] 张金屯.植被与环境关系分析Ⅱ,CCA和DCC A限定排序[J].山西大学学报:自然科学版,1992,15(3):292-298.
[23] 陈宝瑞,朱玉霞,张宏斌,等.呼伦贝尔草甸草原植被的数量分类和排序研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2008,26(5):476-481.
[24] 郭东罡,上官铁梁.中条山中段植物群落数量分类与排序研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2005,23(5):444-448.
[25] 宋创业,郭柯.浑善达克沙地中部丘间低地植物群落分布与土壤环境关系[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):40-49.
[26] 王蒙,董治宝,逯军峰,等.巴丹吉林沙漠周边植被特征和物种多样性[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1226-1233.
[27] 张文辉,卢涛,马克明,等.岷江上游干旱河谷植物群落分布的环境与空间因素分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):552-559.
[28] 宋爱云,刘世荣,史作民,等.卧龙自然保护区亚高山草甸的数量分类与排序[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(27):1174-1178.
[29] 李晋鹏,上官铁梁,孟东平,等.山西吕梁山南段植物群落的数量分类和排序研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2007,13(5):615-619.
[30] 何小琴,蒋志荣,王刚,等.子午岭地区植被恢复演替过程与环境因子的分类与排序[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(3):601-606
[31] 祝廷成,赵毓棠.东北草原上的植被复合体[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版,1965,2:87-102.
[32] 吴征镒.中国植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.
[33] 张金屯.模糊数学及其应用[J].生态学报,1992,12(4):325-331.
[34] 张金屯.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
[35] 冯云,马克明,张育新,等.辽东栎林不同层植物沿海拔梯度分布的DCCA分析[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(3)568-573.
[36] Xu L H,Liu H Y,Chu X Z,et al.Desert vegetation patterns at the northern foot of Tianshan Mountains:the role of soil conditions[J].Flora,2006,201(1):44-50.
[37] Zhang H Y,Qian Y B,Wu Z N,et al.Vegetation-environment Relationships Between Northern Slope of Karlik Mountain and Naomaohu Basin,East Tianshan Mountains[J].Chinese Geographical.Sciences,2012,22(3):288-301.
[38] 伍永秋,张健枫,杜世松,等.毛乌素沙地南缘不同活性沙丘土壤水分时空变化[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1612-1619.
[39] 冉启洋,贡璐,韩丽,等.塔里木河上游绿洲土壤表层盐分特征[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(4):1098-1103.
[40] 郭丽俊,李毅,李敏,等.盐渍化农田土壤斥水性与理化性质的空间变异性[J].土壤学报,2011,48(2):277-285.
[41] 崔悦慧,杨茂,刘静,等.小美旱杨不同部位八大离子含量的动态规律[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2002,23(3):17-21.
[42] 毛东雷,雷加强,李生宇,等.新疆策勒绿洲-沙漠过渡带地表沙物质理化性质空间差异[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(1):136-144.
文章导航

/