img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生态与经济

基于生态敏感性和生态系统服务的黑河中游生态功能区划与生态系统管理

  • 尤南山 ,
  • 蒙吉军
展开
  • 北京大学 城市与环境学院/地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871
尤南山(1993-),男,湖北宜昌人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统管理及土地生态方面的研究。E-mail:nanshany@pku.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2015-09-16

  修回日期: 2015-11-23

  网络出版日期: 2017-01-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41371097)

Ecological Functions Regionalization and Ecosystem Management Based on the Ecological Sensitivity and Ecosystem Service in the Middle Reaches of the Heihe River

  • You Nanshan ,
  • Meng Jijun
Expand
  • College of Urban and Environmental Sciences/Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received date: 2015-09-16

  Revised date: 2015-11-23

  Online published: 2017-01-20

摘要

生态功能区划是协调生态保护与经济发展的矛盾、实施区域生态系统管理的重要途径。以黑河中游为研究区,基于基础地理信息数据、自然地理数据和土地覆被数据(1986、1995、2000、2010、2011年),在生态敏感性和生态系统服务重要性分析的基础上,以最小子流域为基本单元,运用二阶聚类法进行生态功能区划;并依据主导生态系统服务对研究区进行分区管理与生态调控。得出结论:(1)黑河中游生态系统类型以荒漠、草地和农田为主,占总面积的90%;森林、水域、城镇与农村居民点零星分布,所占面积不到10%;1986-2010年,农田经历了减少-扩张-再减少的变化,但城镇与农村居民点一直呈现扩张趋势;(2)西北部生态敏感性明显高于东南部,其中极敏感区(约占24%)主要位于张掖-临泽-高台平原北侧、合黎山、祁连山山前戈壁与荒漠、肃南明花区;高度敏感区(约占58%)分布于走廊中部冲洪积平原;(3)各生态系统服务重要性空间分布格局具有一定的相似性,非常重要和极重要综合服务功能区约占3.2%,位于走廊中部的黑河干流缓冲区内;中等和一般重要地区约占20%,分布在山丹和民乐境内祁连山、焉支山、龙首山附近;(4)黑河中游可分为祁连山森林草地生态区、走廊冲洪积平原农田生态区和走廊北部平原灌丛荒漠生态区3个生态区8个生态功能区,依其主导生态系统服务分为生态保育区、生态协调区和生态控制区3类,进而提出了对应的生态系统管理措施。

本文引用格式

尤南山 , 蒙吉军 . 基于生态敏感性和生态系统服务的黑河中游生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017 , 37(1) : 186 -197 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00175

Abstract

Ecological functions regionalization has become an important method to effectively coordinate the conflict of ecological protection and economic development, to achieve efficient management of regional ecosystems. This research chooses the middle reaches of the Heihe River as the study area. Based on the basic geographic information data, the natural geographic data and the land cover data(1986, 1995, 2000, 2010 and 2011), this research analyzes the ecological sensitivity and the importance of ecosystem services. Small subwatersheds are used as basic clustering units and ecological functions regionalization has achieved applying the two-step cluster method. Furthermore, dominant ecosystem services are identified and zoning management and ecological regulation is proposed. The main conclusions are as follows: (1)The main types of ecosystem in the middle reaches of the Heihe River are desert, grassland and farmland, the sum of the three accounts for more than 90% of the total area; Forest, water and residential area that occupied less than 10% have a sporadical distribution; During 1986 to 2010, the area of farmland reduced, increase and decreased, but the urban and rural settlements has a trend of expansion; (2) Northwest area is obviously more sensitive than southeast. The extremely sensitive area (which takes up about 24%) is distributed in the northern Zhang-lin-gao plain, the Heli Mountains, the Gobi desert front of the Qilian Mountains and the Sunan Minghua counties; The highly sensitive area( which accounts for about 58%) is mainly distributed in the alluvial diluvial plain in Hexi corridor; (3) The spatial pattern of three ecosystem services is similar, the extremely important area that occupies about 3.2% is located in the buffer of the Heihe River; The moderately important area that accounts for 20% is around the Qilian Mountains, Yanzhi Mountains, Longshou Mountains; (4) The middle reaches of the Heihe River can be divided into 3 ecological regions(including Qilian Mountains forest and glassland ecological region, the Hexi corridor alluvial and diluvial fan farmland ecological region, northern corridor fan shrub and desert ecological region) and 8 ecological function regions. Based on the dominant ecosystem services, the ecological function regions are classified as ecological protection zone, ecological coordination zone, ecological control zone, and ecosystem management tactics are proposed, accordingly. The results of the research can provide a reference for ecosystem management in the middle reaches of the Heihe River.

参考文献

[1] World Resources Institute.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment:Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Biodiversity Synthesis[M].Washington DC,USA:Island Press,2005.
[2] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):10-13.
[3] 颜磊,许学工,谢正磊,等.北京市域生态敏感性综合评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(6):3117-3125.
[4] 蔡佳亮,殷贺,黄艺.生态功能区划理论研究进展[J].生态学报,2010,30(11):3018-3027.
[5] 李月臣,刘春霞,闵婕,等.三峡库区生态系统服务功能重要性评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(1):168-178.
[6] 郝吉明,段雷.中国土壤对酸沉降的相对敏感区划[J].环境科学,1999,20(4):1-5.
[7] 李阳兵,邵景安,王世杰,等.基于岩溶生态系统特性的水土流失敏感性评价[J].山地学报,2007,25(6):671-677.
[8] 王春菊,汤小华,郑达贤,等.GIS支持下的土壤侵蚀敏感性评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(1):68-75.
[9] 赵明月,赵文武,靳婷,等.青海湖流域土地沙漠化敏感性评价[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(32):237-242.
[10] 王宏,塔西甫拉提·特依拜,谢霞,等.新疆艾比湖地区不同土地利用类型的土壤盐渍化敏感性评价[J].地理科学进展,2011,30:593-599.
[11] 张伟,王家卓,任希岩等.基于GIS的山地城市生态敏感性分析研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):44-54.
[12] 潘峰,田长彦,邵峰,等.新疆克拉玛依市生态敏感性研究[J].地理学报,2011,66(11):1497-1507.
[13] Briceno-Elizondo E,Garcia-Gonzalo J,Peltola H,et al.Sensitivity of growth of Scots pine,Norway spruce and silver birch to climate change and forest management in boreal conditions[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2006,232(1/3):152-167.
[14] Qin Y,Yi S H,Chen J J,et al.Responses of ecosystem respiration to short-term experimental warming in the alpine meadow ecosystem of a permafrost site on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Cold Regions Science and Technology,2015,115:77-84.
[15] Raupach M R,Haverd V,Briggs P R.Sensitivities of the Australian terrestrial water and carbon balances to climate change and variability[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2013,182:277-291.
[16] 黄静,崔胜辉,李方一,等.厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449.
[17] Costanza R,Arge R,Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural captital[J].Nature,1997,386:253-260.
[18] 谢高地,鲁春霞,郑度,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[19] 贾良清,欧阳志云,赵同谦,等.安徽省生态功能区划研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(2):254-260.
[20] Ditt E H,Mourato S,Ghazoul J,et al.Forest conversion and provision of ecosystem services in the Brazilian atlantic forest[J].Land Degradation & Development,2010,21(6):591-603.
[21] Silvia S,Lokman Z,Mohammed Y S,et al.Valuing ecosystem services for conservation and development purposes:A case study from Kenya[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2013,31:23-33.
[22] Berta M L,Irene I A,Marina G L,et al.Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences[J].Plos One,2012,7(6):1-11.
[23] 傅伯杰,刘国华,陈利顶,等.中国生态区划方案[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):1-6.
[24] 郑度.中国生态地理区域系统研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2008.
[25] 国家环境保护总局.生态功能区划暂行规程[Z].2002.
[26] 环境保护部,中国科学院.全国生态功能区划[Z].2008.
[27] 白杨,郑华,欧阳志云,等.海河流域生态功能区划[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(9):2377-2382.
[28] 王传辉,吴立,王心源,等.基于遥感和GIS的巢湖流域生态功能分区研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5808-5817.
[29] 胡孟春,马荣华.黑河流域生态功能区划遥感制图方法[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(1):49-53.
[30] 潘竟虎,董晓峰.基于GIS的黑河流域生态环境敏感性评价与分区[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):267-273.
[31] Fischer G,Nachtergaele S F,Prieler H T,et al.Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008)[M].Rome,Italy:ⅡASA.
[32] 李炳元.中国1:400万地貌图(形态)[Z],1994.
[33] 蒙吉军,赵春红,刘明达.基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价——以鄂尔多斯市为例[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(4):578-590.
[34] 刘康,欧阳志云,王效科,等.甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2711-2718.
[35] 买买提·沙吾提,塔西甫拉提·特依拜,丁建丽,等.基于GIS的干旱区土壤盐渍化敏感性评价——以渭干河-库车河三角洲绿洲为例[J].资源科学,2012,34(2):353-358.
[36] Gao Y N,Gao J F,Chen J F,et al.Regionalizing aquatic ecosystems based on the river sub-basin taxonomy concept and spatial clustering techniques[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2011,8(11):4367-4385.
[37] Zeng Q,Zhang Y M,Jia Y F,et al.Zoning for management in wetland nature reserves:a case study using Wuliangsuhai Nature Reserve,China[J].Springer Plus,2012,1:23.
文章导航

/