img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
生物与土壤

生物土壤结皮对荒漠区土壤微生物数量和活性的影响

  • 杨航宇 ,
  • 刘艳梅 ,
  • 王廷璞 ,
  • 回嵘
展开
  • 1. 甘肃农业大学 草业学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 甘肃林业职业技术学院, 甘肃 天水 741020;
    3. 天水师范学院 生物工程与技术学院 甘肃省高校农业微生物重点实验室, 甘肃 天水 741001;
    4. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 沙坡头沙漠试验研究站, 甘肃 兰州 730000
杨航宇(1978-),男,甘肃陇南人,在读博士,副教授,主要从事干旱区土壤生物的研究。E-mail:yhy-780601@163.com

收稿日期: 2016-03-25

  修回日期: 2016-05-26

  网络出版日期: 2017-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41761057),甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1610RJZE133)

Effects of Biological Soil Crusts on the Amount and Activities of Soil Microbes in Desert Areas

  • Yang Hangyu ,
  • Liu Yanmei ,
  • Wang Tingpu ,
  • Hui Rong
Expand
  • 1. College of Grassland Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. Gansu Forestry Technology College, Tianshui 741020, Gansu, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microorganisms of Universities in Gansu Province, School of Biological Engineering and Technology, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, Gansu, China;
    4. Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2016-03-25

  Revised date: 2016-05-26

  Online published: 2017-09-20

摘要

生物土壤结皮对荒漠生态系统的维持与改良发挥着重要作用。土壤微生物可敏感地指示土壤质量,是衡量荒漠区生态健康程度的重要生物学特征,而对荒漠区生物土壤结皮与土壤微生物关系知之甚少。本研究设计了两组对比试验。一组以腾格里沙漠东南缘的1956、1964、1981、1991年的植被固沙区结皮下的沙丘土壤为对象,以流沙区和天然植被区为对照。另一组以植被固沙区人为干扰生物土壤结皮下的沙丘土壤为研究对象,以未干扰结皮下的沙丘土壤为对照。结果表明:腾格里沙漠东南缘植被固沙区的藻-地衣和藓类结皮均可显著提高土壤可培养微生物的数量和基础呼吸(P<0.05);适度人为干扰生物土壤结皮不会显著影响土壤可培养微生物的数量和基础呼吸,而严重人为干扰结皮可显著降低土壤可培养微生物的数量和基础呼吸,指示严重人为干扰结皮可导致荒漠区土壤质量下降;土壤可培养微生物的数量和基础呼吸也因结皮演替阶段的不同而有所不同,演替晚期的藓类结皮下土壤微生物数量和基础呼吸显著高于演替早期的藻-地衣结皮(P<0.05);土壤可培养微生物的数量和土壤基础呼吸与固沙年限均存在显著的正相关关系,随着沙丘固沙年限的增加,结皮层增厚,结皮下土壤微生物数量及基础呼吸显著增加(P<0.05);生物土壤结皮下土壤可培养微生物数量和基础呼吸呈现显著的季节变化,表现为夏季>秋季和春季>冬季。因此,腾格里沙漠东南缘植被固沙区的生物土壤结皮提高了土壤微生物数量和活性,表明生物土壤结皮有利于荒漠区土壤及荒漠生态系统的恢复。

本文引用格式

杨航宇 , 刘艳梅 , 王廷璞 , 回嵘 . 生物土壤结皮对荒漠区土壤微生物数量和活性的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017 , 37(5) : 950 -960 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00071

Abstract

As an important component, biological soil crusts (BSCs) play an important role in maintaining and improving in desert ecosystems. Soil microbes could be used as significant biological indices to reflect soil quality and important biological properties in measuring sandy ecological restoration. However, so far little was known on the relationship of BSCs with soil microbes in desert areas. To completely understand how BSCs affect soil microbes, the study was designed two groups of test. Sand soil under BSCs was served as the object in revegetated areas at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert as one group test. The revegetated areas were divided into four areas by sand-fixing time stabilized in 1956, 1964, 1981 and 1991, respectively. Soil of mobile sand dunes and natural vegetation areas were served as the contrast. Soil under BSCs caused by human disturbance was acted as the research object and soil underneath non-disturbed crust was the reference as another group test. Our results showed that cyanobacteria-lichen and moss crusts could significantly increase the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration(P<0.05). Moderate disturbance to BSCs has no obvious effect on the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration. However,serious disturbance to BSCs could obviously decrease the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration, indicating the decline of soil quality in desert regions. The succession stages of crust significantly affected the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration which late-stage moss crusts had significantly higher the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration than early-stage cyanobacteria-lichen crusts(P<0.05). The sand-fixing age was linear correlated with the amount of culturable microbes and soil basal respiration. Along with the increasement of the sand-fixing age, crust thickness increased and the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration under crusts also significantly increased. There were seasonal changes of the amount of soil culturable microbes and soil basal respiration under crusts, follow orders:summer > autumn and spring > winter. Therefore, BSCs increased the amount and activities of soil microbes. The results indicate that BSCs could improve soil quality and the recovery of desert ecosystems in desert areas.

参考文献

[1] West N E.Structure and function of microphytic soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions[J].Advances in Ecological Research,1990,20:179-223.
[2] 李新荣,张元明,赵允格.生物土壤结皮研究:进展、前沿与展望[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(1):11-24.
[3] Belnap J,Lange O L.Biological Soil Crust:Structure,Function and Management[M].Berlin,Germany:Springer-Verlag.2003:3.
[4] 李新荣,周海燕,王新平,等.中国干旱沙区的生态重建与恢复:沙坡头站60年重要研究进展综述[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):247-264.
[5] Steven B,Gallegos-Graves L V,Yeager C,et al.Common and distinguishing features of the bacterial and fungal communities in biological soil crusts and shrub root zone soils[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2014,69,302-312.
[6] 张元明,王雪芹.荒漠地表生物土壤结皮形成与演替特征概述[J].生态学报,2010,30(16):4484-4492.
[7] 裴雪霞.典型种植制度下长期施肥对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
[8] 贾淑霞.落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤、根系和土壤微生物呼吸研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2009.
[9] Fernandes S A P,Bettiol W,Cerri C C.Effect of sewage sludge on microbial biomass,basal respiration,metabolic quotient and soil enzymatic activity[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2005,30(1):65-77.
[10] Creamer R E,Schulte R P O,Stone D,et al.Measuring basal soil respiration across Europe:do incubation temperature and incubation period matter?[J].Ecological Indicators,2014,36:409-418.
[11] Zhang Y M.The microstructure and formation of biological soil crusts in their early developmental stage[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2005,50:117-121.
[12] Li X J,Li X R,Song W M,et al.Effects of crust and shrub patches on runoff,sedimentation,and related nutrient (C,N) redistribution in the desertified steppe zone of the Tengger Desert,Northern China[J].Geomorphology,2008,96:221-232.
[13] Zhao H L,Guo Y R,Zhou R L,et al.The effects of plantation development on biological soil crust and topsoil properties in a desert in northern China[J].Geoderma,2011,160:367-372.
[14] Liu Y M,Li X R,Xing Z S,et al.Responses of soil microbial biomass and community composition to biological soil crusts in the revegetated areas of the Tengger Desert[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2013,65:52-59.
[15] Ustin S L,Valko P G,Kefauver S C,et al.Remote sensing of biological soil crust under simulated climate change manipulations in the Mojave Desert[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2009,113:317-328.
[16] O'Bryan K,Prober S M,Lunt I D,et al.Frequent fire promotes diversity and cover of biological soil crusts in a derived temperate grassland[J].Oecologia,2009,159:827-838.
[17] Zhang W,Zhang G S,Liu G X,et al.Bacterial diversity and distribution in the southeast edge of the Tengger Desert and their correlation with soil enzyme activities[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2012,24(11):2004-2011.
[18] 边丹丹.黄土丘陵区不同植被状况下土壤生物结皮对土壤生物学性质的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
[19] 邵玉琴,赵吉.不同固沙区结皮中微生物生物量和数量的比较研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(1):68-71.
[20] 宁远英.科尔沁沙地生物结皮中土壤微生物、土壤酶活性的变化及其与土壤因子的关系[D].内蒙古通辽:内蒙古师范大学,2011.
[21] Yu J,Kidron G J,Pen-Mouratov S,et al.Do development stages of biological soil crusts determine activity and functional diversity in a sand-dune ecosystem?[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2012,55:66-72.
[22] 齐玉春,董云社,金钊,等.生物结皮对内蒙古沙地灌丛草地土壤呼吸特征的影响[J].地理科学,2010,30(6):898-903.
[23] 李玉强,赵哈林,赵玮,等.生物结皮对土壤呼吸的影响作用初探[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):106-109,151.
[24] Li X R,Xiao H L,Zhang J G,et al.Long-term ecosystem effects of sand-binding vegetation in Shapotou region of Tengger Desert,northern China[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12:376-390.
[25] Li X R,He M Z,Duan Z H,et al.Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert,northern China[J].Gemorphology,2007,88:254-265.
[26] Liu Y M,Yang H Y,Li X R,et al.Effects of biological soil crusts on soil enzyme activities in revegetated areas of the Tengger Desert,China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2014,80:6-14.
[27] 高永健,袁玉欣,刘四维,等.不同林龄杨树人工林对土壤微生物状况和酶活性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23:185-189
[28] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:238-240.
[29] Steinberger Y.Energy and protein budgets of the desert isopod Hemilepistrus reaumuri[J].Acta Oecologia,1989,10:117-134.
[30] Darby B J,Neher D A,Belnap J.Soil nematode communities are ecologically more mature beneath late- than early-successional stage biological soil crusts[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2007,35(1):203-212.
[31] Liu Y M,Li X R,Jia R L,et al.Effects of biological soil crusts on soil nematode communities following dune stabilization in the Tengger Desert,Northern China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2011,49:118-124.
[32] 石万里,王辉,马维伟.沙区植被恢复对土壤微生物量及活性的影响[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(3):507-513.
[33] 黄懿梅,安韶山,薛虹.黄土丘陵区草地土壤微生物C、N及呼吸熵对植被恢复的响应[J].生态学报,2009,29(6):2811-2818.
[34] Guo Y R,Zhao H L,Zuo X A,et al.Biological soil crust development and its topsoil properties in the process of dune stabilization,Inner Mongolia,China[J].Environmental Geology,2008,54(3):653-662.
[35] Jia R L,Li X R,Liu L C,et al.Responses of biological soil crusts to sand burial in vegetated area of the Tengger Desert,Northern China[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2008,40(11):2827-2834.
[36] Patrick E.Researching crusting soils:themes,trends,recent developments and implications for managing soil and water resources in dry areas[J].Progress in Physical Geography,2002,26(3):442-461.
[37] Barger N N,Herrick J E,van Zee J,et al.Impacts of biological soil crust disturbance and composition on the C and N loss from water erosion[J].Biogeochemistry,2006,77(2):247-263.
[38] 王少昆,赵学勇,左小安,等.科尔沁沙质草甸土壤微生物数量的垂直分布及季节动态[J].干旱区地理,2009,32(4):610-615.
文章导航

/