img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索
水文与水资源

黄河上游沙漠宽谷段高含沙支流对干流的淤堵影响

  • 王平 ,
  • 胡恬 ,
  • 郭秀吉 ,
  • 张原锋
展开
  • 黄河水利委员会 黄河水利科学研究院, 河南 郑州 450003
王平(1977-),男,四川成都人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从河床演变和水库泥沙研究工作。E-mail:wp_sc@sina.com

收稿日期: 2016-06-08

  修回日期: 2016-11-08

  网络出版日期: 2017-11-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(51379087,51609094);国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAB02B03);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(HKY-JBYW-2017-07)

Hyperconcentrated Tributary Flows in the Main Stream of Desert and Wide-valley Reaches of the Upper Yellow River

  • Wang Ping ,
  • Hu Tian ,
  • Guo Xiuji ,
  • Zhang Yuanfeng
Expand
  • Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China

Received date: 2016-06-08

  Revised date: 2016-11-08

  Online published: 2017-11-20

摘要

黄河上游沙漠宽谷段支流——十大孔兑的高含沙洪水多次淤堵黄河干流,造成灾害。基于实测水文泥沙资料和模型试验手段对孔兑高含沙洪水特点、淤堵干流过程和交汇区沙坝形态进行了研究。结果表明:孔兑洪水具有陡涨陡落、持续时间短、洪峰流量大、含沙量高、输沙量大等特点;孔兑洪水形成沙坝、淤堵黄河的过程可分为形成、相对稳定和冲刷3个阶段,支流洪水量级较大,形成的沙坝规模较大,沙坝冲刷历时也较长;孔兑高含沙水流入黄交汇区水流结构分区包括壅水区、回流区、高流速带、剪切层等组成要素,沙坝淤积形态模式包括壅水区、回流区、回流区下游淤积体和交汇区输水输沙窄槽;基于沙坝淤堵判别方法以及实测和试验数据提出了孔兑入黄交汇区沙坝判别条件。

本文引用格式

王平 , 胡恬 , 郭秀吉 , 张原锋 . 黄河上游沙漠宽谷段高含沙支流对干流的淤堵影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017 , 37(6) : 1240 -1249 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2017.00003

Abstract

The hyperconcentrated flood of the tributaries of the desert and wide-valley reaches of the Upper Yellow River formed sandbars in the confluences blocking the main stream several times. Based on field and experimental data, the properties of hyperconcentrated flood, the process of blocking and the sandbar morphology in the confluence were analyzed. The results indicate that the hyperconcentrated floods from the tributaries feature steep rising and dropping, short duration, high peak, large flood volume, high sediment concentration. The evolution process of the sandbar included three stages, the forming, the stability and the scouring. The larger the magnitude of the flood, the greater the scale of the sandbar, and the longer the time of sandbar scouring. The hyperconcentrated flow confluence can be divided into five hydraulic regions, the backwater zone, the separation zone, the maximum velocity area, and the shear layer. The bed morphology consists of four basic elements, the sandbar in the backwater zone, the bar in the separation zone, the bars in the reach downstream of the separation zone, and the channel for flow conveyance and sediment transport. Based on field and experimental data, the inequations were established for discriminating the magnitude of sandbar blocking caused by hyperconcentrated floods of the tributaries.

参考文献

[1] 支俊峰,时明立.“89.7.21”十大孔兑区洪水泥沙淤堵黄河分析[M]//汪岗,范昭.黄河水沙变化研究.郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002.
[2] 杨振业.1961、1966年内蒙古昭君坟段泥沙淤积黄河受阻的情况分析[J].人民黄河,1984,6(6):15-19.
[3] 冯国华,张庆琼.十大孔兑综合治理与黄河内蒙古段度汛安全[J].人民黄河,2008,30(4):8-10.
[4] 武盛,于玲红.西柳沟泄洪对包钢造成的危害及其对策[J].包钢科技,2001,27(增刊):159-161.
[5] James L B.Flow dynamics at river channel confluences:implications for sediment transport and bed morphology[M]//Etheridge F G,Flores R M,Harvey M D.Recent Development in Fluvial Sedimentology.Oklahoma,USA:Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists,1987.
[6] James L B.Sediment transport and bed morphology at river channel confluence[J].Sedimentology,1988,35:481-498.
[7] James L B,Bruce L R.Sediment transport,bed morphology and the sedimentology of river channel confluences[M]//Stephen R,Andre R,Bruce L R.River confluences,Tributaries and the Fluvial Network.Chichester.West Sussex,England:John Wiley and Sons Ltd,2008:45-72.
[8] Larry J W,Eric D S,Nicola M.Experiments on fow at a 90° open-channel junction[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2001,127:340-350.
[9] 王协康,王宪业,卢伟真,等.明渠水流交汇区流动特征试验研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2006,38(2):1-5.
[10] 茅泽育,赵升伟,罗昇,等.明渠交汇口水流分离区研究[J].水科学进展,2005,16(1):7-12.
[11] 王协康,杨青远,卢伟真,等.交汇水流分离区特征研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2008,40(6):1-6.
[12] Ahmad S,Mohammad R M T,Amir R Z.Three-dimensional numerical study of flow structure in Channel Confluences[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2010,37:772-781.
[13] Alexander N S.Field investigation of three-dimensional flow structure at stream confluence 2.Turbulence[J].Water Resources Research,2001,37(9):2411-2424.
[14] 刘同宦,王协康,郭炜,等.支流水沙作用下干流床面冲淤特征试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2006,23(2):9-12.
[15] 刘同宦,郭炜,王协康,等.入汇角为30°时交汇区水流结构试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2007,24(4):75-78.
[16] 刘同宦,郭炜,詹磊.90°支流入汇区域时均流速分布特征试验研究[J].水利学报,2009,20(4):485-489.
[17] James L B,Ian R.Separation zone at open-channel junctions[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1984,110:1588-1594.
[18] Liu T H,Chen L,Fan B L.Experiment study on flow pattern and sediment transportation at a 90° open-channel confluence[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2012,27:178-187.
[19] 陈立,段涛,闫涛,等.库区交汇流河段泥沙淤积特性研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2013,45(3):57-62.
[20] 闫涛,陈立,黄杰.库区交汇河段淤积沙坝形成的水动力试验研究[J].华中科技大学学报:自然科学版,2015,48(8):123-126.
[21] Roger L H.Process on arid-region alluvial fans[J].Journal of Geology,1967,75:405-460.
[22] Bigelow P E,Benda L E,Miller D J,et al.On debris flows,river networks,and the spatial structure of channel morphology[J].Forest Science,2007,53(2):220-238.
[23] Yuanfan T.Three-dimensional topography of debris fan[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineer,2006,132(3):307-318.
[24] 陈春光,姚令侃,杨庆华.泥石流与主河水流交汇的试验研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2004,39(1):10-14.
[25] 陈春光,姚令侃,刘翠容,等.杜翠泥石流堵河条件的研究[J].水利学报,2013,44(6):648-656.
[26] 郭志学,余斌,曹叔尤,等.泥石流入汇主河情况下交汇口附近变化规律的试验研究[J].水利学报,2004(1):33-37.
[27] 张原锋,王平,侯素珍,等.黄河上游干支流交汇区沙坝淤堵形成条件[J].水科学进展,2013,24(3):333-339.
[28] 王平,张原锋,侯素珍,等.黄河上游高含沙支流入汇与交汇区淤积形态试验研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2013,45(5):34-42.
[29] 杨根生,拓万全,戴丰年,等.风沙对黄河内蒙古河段河道泥沙淤积的影响[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(2):152-159.
[30] 中国科学院兰州沙漠所黄土高原考查队.黄河沙坡头-河曲河段风成沙入黄沙量的估算[J].人民黄河,1988,10(1):14-19.
[31] 李永山,彭文昌,任亮,等.近50年黄河乌兰布和沙漠段辫状河道[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1689-1694.
[32] 王金花,张荣刚,姚文艺,等,郑晓梅.风蚀水蚀共同作用下沙漠河流泥沙级配特征[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1696-1700.
[33] 张红武,江恩惠.黄河高含沙洪水模型的相似律[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1994.
文章导航

/