科尔沁沙地樟子松(Pinus sylvestris)人工固沙林演变过程中物种多样性和土壤水分特征

罗维成; 赵文智; 孙程鹏; 闫加亮

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00151

中国沙漠 >

2018 , Vol. 38 >Issue 1: 126 - 132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00151

生物与土壤

科尔沁沙地樟子松(Pinus sylvestris)人工固沙林演变过程中物种多样性和土壤水分特征

罗维成 ,
赵文智 ,
孙程鹏 ,
闫加亮

展开

1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所中国生态系统研究网络临泽内陆河流域研究站/中国科学院内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

罗维成(1987-),男,甘肃靖远人,博士研究生,主要从事生态水文学研究。E-mail:luoweicheng@lzb.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2016-06-30

修回日期: 2016-11-18

网络出版日期: 2018-01-20

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2013CB429903）

收起

Changes in Species Composition, Diversity and Soil Water Content of Pinus sylvestris Artificial Sand-fixation Forest along An Afforestation Successional Gradient in Horqin

Luo Weicheng ,
Zhao Wenzhi ,
Sun Chengpeng ,
Yan Jialiang

Expand

1. Linze Inland River Basin Research Station/Key Laboratory of Inland River Ecohydrology, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
2. University of China Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2016-06-30

Revised date: 2016-11-18

Online published: 2018-01-20

Fold

摘要

人工固沙植被是干旱、半干旱区荒漠化防治的重要内容，研究人工固沙植被演变过程中物种多样性和土壤水分变化特征对于人工固沙植被的经营与管理有重要意义。对科尔沁沙地营造的5~45 a的樟子松（Pinus sylvestris）人工固沙植被林下植被的物种多样性和土壤水分变化特征进行了研究。结果表明：在樟子松固沙林演变过程中，群落中禾本科和菊科植物种始终占主导地位，且随着樟子松栽植年限的增加，禾本科植物所占比例显著增加。物种总数和草本植物数量都随着栽植年限的增加显著降低，呈显著的线性关系。而灌木数量和栽植年限呈抛物线形关系，随着樟子松栽植年限的增加先增大后减小。草本植物盖度和地上生物量与樟子松栽植年限也呈抛物线形关系，在栽植25 a后草本植物盖度达到最大值。樟子松人工固沙林演变过程对土壤含水量也有显著影响，土壤平均含水量和樟子松栽植年限呈显著线性关系，栽植45 a后，土壤平均含水量由3.5%降至1.4%。土壤水分的急剧下降是樟子松人工林演变后期面临的主要挑战。

关键词： 樟子松(Pinus sylvestris); 植物多样性; 物种组成; 土壤含水量

本文引用格式

罗维成 , 赵文智 , 孙程鹏 , 闫加亮 . 科尔沁沙地樟子松(Pinus sylvestris)人工固沙林演变过程中物种多样性和土壤水分特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018 , 38(1) : 126 -132 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00151

Abstract

Afforestation is a key technique for control of desertification in arid and semi-arid regions. Therefore, study the characteristics of species composition, diversity and soil water content of artificial sand-fixation forest during its successive process is important for the management of artificial vegetation. In this paper, we studied characteristics of species composition, diversity and soil water content of Pinus sylvestris artificial sand-fixation forest along an afforestation successional gradient from 5-45 years in Horchin. Our results show that the community was dominated by species in the Poaceae and Compositae during the successive process, and the number of species in the Compositae was significant increased with the increase of plantation age. The number of total species and herbs were decreased with the increase of plantation age followed a linear functions. However, the relationship between the number of shrubs and plantation age can well described with parabola functions. The biomass and coverage of herbs were first increased and then decreased with the increase of plantation age, and reached their maximum when the plantation age was 25 years. Soil water content was significant decreased with the increase of plantation age. And the average soil water content was decreased from 3.5% to 1.4% after 45 years. The shapely decline of soil water moisture is the mainly challenge of P. sylvestris in the later successive process.

Key words： Pinus sylvestris; species diversity; species composition; soil water content

参考文献

[1] 李新荣,张景光,刘立超,等.腾格里沙漠沙坡头地区固沙植被对生物多样性恢复的长期影响[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):173-181.
[2] 焦树仁.干旱对章古台沙地樟子松人工林生长的影响[J].林业科学,1986,22(4):419-425.
[3] 赵文智.奈曼沙区樟子松生长状况与水分关系[J].中国沙漠,1992,12(1):64-70.
[4] 曾德慧,姜凤岐,范志平,等.樟子松人工固沙林稳定性的研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):337-343.
[5] 朱教君,康宏樟,李智辉,等.水分胁迫对不同年龄沙地樟子松幼苗存活与光合特性影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2527-2533.
[6] Zhu J J,Fan Z P,Zeng D H,et al.Comparison of stand structure and growth between plantation and natural forests of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica on sandy land[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2003,14:103-111.
[7] 朱教君,曾德慧,康红章,等.沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005.
[8] 吴祥云,姜凤岐,李晓丹,等.樟子松人工固沙林衰退的规律和原因[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2225-2228.
[9] 朱教君,康宏樟,宋立宁,等.科尔沁沙地南缘樟子松人工林地下水埋深季节变化[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(9):1767-1772.
[10] 张继义,赵哈林,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地植被恢复系列上群落演替与物种多样性的恢复动态[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):86-92.
[11] 左小安,赵哈林,赵学勇,等.科尔沁沙地不同恢复年限退化植被的物种多样性[J].草业学报,2009,18(4):9-16.
[12] Kalacska M,Sanchez-Azofeifa G A,Calvo-Alvarado J C,et al.Species composition,similarity and diversity in three successional stages of a seasonally dry tropical forest[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2004,200(1/2/3):227-247.
[13] Suganuma M S,Assis G B D,Durigan G.Changes in plant species composition and functional traits along the successional trajectory of a restored patch of Atlantic Forest[J].Community Ecology,2014,151(1):27-36.
[14] Liu B,Zhao W,Liu Z,et al.Changes in species diversity,aboveground biomass,and vegetation cover along an afforestation successional gradient in a semiarid desert steppe of China[J].Ecological Engineering,2015,81:301-311.
[15] 方杰,魏雅芬,刘帅,等.科尔沁沙地丘间低地樟子松人工林水分利用来源的稳定同位素解析[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(9):1894-1900.
[16] 移小勇,赵哈林,崔建垣,等.科尔沁沙地不同密度(小面积)樟子松人工林生长状况[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1200-1206.
[17] 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会.我国北方农牧交错带沙漠化的成因、过程和防治对策[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(增刊1):22-28.
[18] 张金屯.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
[19] 侯扶江,南志标,肖金玉,等.重牧退化草地的植被、土壤及其耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):915-922.
[20] Jules M J,Sawyer J O,Jules E S.Assessing the relationships between stand development and understory vegetation using a 420-year chronosequence[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2008,255(7):2384-2393.
[21] Hunt S L,Gordon A M,Morris D M,et al.Understory vegetation in northern Ontario jack pine and black spruce plantations:20-year successional changes[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2011,33(9):1791-1803.
[22] Souza A F,Pizo M A,Crossetti L O,et al.Afforestation effects on vegetation structure and diversity of grasslands in southern Brazil:the first years[J].Journal for Nature Conservation,2013,21(1):56-62.
[23] 胡相明,程积民,万惠娥.黄土丘陵区人工林下草本层植物的结构特征[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):41-45.
[24] 高艳鹏,赵廷宁,骆汉.晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区人工林下草本植物生物多样性研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):103-108.
[25] 张继义,赵哈林,崔建垣,等.科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤水分动态的研究[J].林业科学,2005,41(3):1-6.
[26] 魏雅芬,方杰,赵学勇,等.科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林不同年龄针叶生理生态性状[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1271-1280.
[27] 杨凯,朱教君,张金鑫,等.不同林龄落叶松人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的季节变化[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5500-5507.
[28] 牛小云,孙晓梅,陈东升,等.辽东山区不同林龄日本落叶松人工林土壤微生物、养分及酶活性[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2663-2672.
[29] 李淑君,李国旗,王磊,等.荒漠草原区不同林龄柠条林物种多样性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(6):82-87.
[30] 格日勒,斯琴毕力格,金荣.毛乌素沙地引种樟子松生长特性的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(5):159-162.
[31] 陈民生,赵京岚,刘杰,等.人工林林下植被研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,39(2):321-325.
[32] Li X R,Tan H J,He M Z,et al.Patterns of shrub species richness and abundance in relation to environmental factors on the Alxa Plateau:prerequisites for conserving shrub diversity in extreme arid desert regions[J].Science in China,2009,52(5):669-680.
[33] 苏芳莉,刘明国,郭成久,等.沙地樟子松根系垂直分布特征及对土壤的影响[J].中国水土保持,2006(1):20-22.
[34] 牛丽,岳广阳,赵哈林,等.利用液流法估算樟子松和小叶锦鸡儿人工林蒸腾耗水[J].北京林业大学学报,2008(6):1-8.
[35] 郭忠升,邵明安.黄土丘陵半干旱区柠条锦鸡儿人工林对土壤水分的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):1-7.
[36] 焦树仁.樟子松人工林蒸腾耗水量的初步研究[J].生态学杂志,1984,3(6):15-18.
[37] 刘芳,章尧想,马迎宾,等.乌兰布和沙漠绿洲樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)生长规律初探[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1234-1238.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献