img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索

1975—2015年甘肃省白龙江流域自然保护区生态系统服务价值及其时空差异

  • 幸赞品 ,
  • 颜长珍 ,
  • 冯坤 ,
  • 修丽娜 ,
  • 钱大文 ,
  • 谢家丽
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 沙漠与沙漠化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
幸赞品(1993-),女,重庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态遥感。E-mail:13996201062@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-12-17

  修回日期: 2019-02-26

  网络出版日期: 2019-06-10

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500201)

Spatial and Temporal Variation of Ecosystem Service Value in the Nature Reserves of Bailongjiang Watershed from 1975 to 2015

  • Xing Zanpin ,
  • Yan Changzhen ,
  • Feng Kun ,
  • Xiu Lina ,
  • Qian Dawen ,
  • Xie Jiali
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2018-12-17

  Revised date: 2019-02-26

  Online published: 2019-06-10

摘要

利用1975—2015年7期遥感数据重建甘肃省白龙江流域8个野生动物自然保护区的生态系统时空变化特征,并在对该研究区各类生态系统服务价值当量修订的基础上,采用生态系统服务价值评估模型和敏感性指数,对不同时期的生态系统服务价值进行评估。结果表明:(1)白龙江流域自然保护区以森林生态系统为主,研究期内生态系统格局总体稳定,农田和裸地生态系统面积减少,而森林、草地、水域和人工表面生态系统呈增加趋势,且在2000年后变化最活跃。(2)研究区生态系统服务价值由1975年的239.68×108元上升到2015年的243.58×108元,净增加3.90×108元,农田和裸地生态系统服务价值持续减少,而森林、草地和水域生态系统服务价值则呈增加趋势。(3)整体上,研究区南部生态系统服务价值呈增长趋势,而中北部地区则处于阶段性变化状态,文县大鲵自然保护区单位面积生态系统服务价值密度最高,多儿自然保护区价值密度最低,且为唯一衰退型保护区。(4)在不同生态系统服务类型中,调节服务居主导地位,且以气候调节服务价值最高。白龙江流域自然保护区生态系统服务价值缺乏弹性,水域生态系统面积变化对研究区生态系统服务价值的变化具有放大作用。

本文引用格式

幸赞品 , 颜长珍 , 冯坤 , 修丽娜 , 钱大文 , 谢家丽 . 1975—2015年甘肃省白龙江流域自然保护区生态系统服务价值及其时空差异[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019 , 39(3) : 172 -182 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00024

Abstract

With seven periods of remote sensing data in 1975, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015, variations of ecosystem in 8 wild animal nature reserves in Bailongjiang Watershed were analyzed and based on the revision of the equivalent table of ecosystem service values, in combination with the methods of ecosystem service value evaluation model and sensitivity index, the ecosystem service value of different ecosystem types and ecosystem service types as well as ecosystem service value in these nature reserves were calculated. The results showed that: (1) The area of forest ecosystem took a dominant place in Bailongjiang Watershed nature reserves, and the ecosystem pattern had no obvious variation, which was mainly expressed as the area of farmland and bareland decreased,while forest, grassland, water and artificial increased. After 2000, the area variation of each ecosystem turned out to be the most active period. (2) The ecosystem services assessment showed that the total ecosystem service value increased 3.90×108 RMB, which was from 239.68×108 RMB in 1975 to 243.58×108 RMB in 2015 over the study area. Among the ecosystem service value of different ecosystem types, farmland and bareland declined constantly,while forest, grassland and water continually increased. (3) On the whole, the ecosystem service value by per unit area was in a growing trend to the south, but in a state of phase change to the north central. Among these nature reserves, the value density of Wenxian Andrias davidianus nature reserve was the highest,while Duoer nature reserve not only had the lowest value,and was the only recessionary protected area. (4) Among different ecosystem service types, the leading position was occupied by regulating service, of which climate service was the main contributor of the ecosystem service value. The sensitivity analysis showed that the ecosystem service value in study area was inelastic, and the water area variation reflected by the value change rate of the ecosystem service change had a significant influence.

参考文献

[1] 于贵瑞.生态系统管理学的概念框架及其生态学基础[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(5):787-794.
[2] Bolliger J,Bttig M,Gallati J,et al.Landscape multifunctionality:a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change[J].Regional Environmental Change,2011,11(1):203-206.
[3] 李边疆.土地利用与生态环境关系研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2007.
[4] Mooney H A,Duraiappah A,Larigauderie A.Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2013,110(1):3665-3672.
[5] 魏慧,赵文武,张骁,等.基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价——以山东省德州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3830-3839.
[6] Costanza R,d'Arge R,de Groot R,et al.The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[7] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):19-25.
[8] 谢春花,王克林,陈洪松,等.土地利用变化对洞庭湖区生态系统服务价值的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2006,15(2):191-195.
[9] 梁欣,臧淑英,张思冲.基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以大庆市为例[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(2):68-72.
[10] Li F,Zhang S W,Yang J C,et al.The effects of population density changes on ecosystem services value:a case study in Western Jilin,China[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,61(2):328-337.
[11] 李晋昌,王文丽,胡光印,等.若尔盖高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3451-3459.
[12] 徐煖银,郭泺,薛达元,等.赣南地区土地利用格局及生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].生态学报,2019,39(1):1-9.
[13] Ghermandi A,Sheela A M,Justus J.Integrating similarity analysis and ecosystem service value transfer:results from a tropical coastal wetland in India[J].Ecosystem Services,2016,22:73-82.
[14] Posner S,Verutes G,Koh L,et al.Global use of ecosystem service models[J].Ecosystem Services,2016,17:131-141.
[15] 张建亮,钱者东,徐网谷,等.国家级自然保护区生态系统格局十年变化(2000-2010年)评估[J].生态学报,2017,37(23):8067-8076.
[16] 陈万旭,李江风,姜卫,等.豫西山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):376-381.
[17] 王燕,高吉喜,王金生,等.新疆国家级自然保护区土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(5):1439-1446.
[18] 谢正宇,李文华,谢正君,等.艾比湖湿地自然保护区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(3):532-540.
[19] 游惠明,黄思忠,谭芳林,等.福建泉州湾自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(7):83-88.
[20] 王敏,冯相昭,吴良,等.气候变化背景下典型草原自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1700-1707.
[21] 胡克梅,刘伟玲,朱京海,等.2000-2010年井冈山国家级自然保护区生态系统功能变化评估[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):219-223.
[22] 张淑花,张雪萍.扎龙自然保护区生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):73-77.
[23] 巩杰,张金茜,钱彩云,等.1990-2014年甘肃省白龙江流域土地利用变化对人类活动响应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):219-224+346.
[24] 刘英英,石培基,刘玲,等.长江上游生态脆弱区土地利用结构及生态服务价值变化响应——以甘肃省陇南市为例[J].土壤,2011,43(4):644-649.
[25] 欧阳志云,张路,吴炳方,等.基于遥感技术的全国生态系统分类体系[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):219-226.
[26] 王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):83-89.
[27] 陈述彭,童庆禧,郭华东.遥感信息机理研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:341.
[28] Costanza R,d'Arge R,de Groot R,et al.全球生态系统服务与自然资本的价值估算[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(2):70-78.
[29] 谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[30] Soymassoni E,Langemeyer J,Varga D,et al.The importance of ecosystem services in coastal agricultural landscapes:case study from the Costa Brava,Catalonia[J].Ecosystem Services,2016,17:43-52.
[31] Kibria A S M G,Behie A,Costanza R,et al.The value of ecosystem services obtained from the protected forest of Cambodia:the case of Veun Sai-Siem Pang National Park[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,26:27-36.
[32] 张艳军,官冬杰,翟俊,等.重庆市生态系统服务功能价值时空变化研究[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(3):1169-1177.
[33] Zhang Z,Gao J,Gao Y.The influences of land use changes on the value of ecosystem services in Chaohu Lake Basin,China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2015,74(1):385-395.
[34] 周文霞,石培基,王永男,等.河谷型城市生态系统服务价值效应——以兰州为例[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):232-241.
[35] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[36] 张怀全.甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2015.
文章导航

/