固沙植被区土壤质地与土壤微生物数量的关系

吕星宇; 张志山

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00087

中国沙漠 >

2019 , Vol. 39 >Issue 5: 71 - 79

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00087

固沙植被区土壤质地与土壤微生物数量的关系

吕星宇 ,
张志山

展开

1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院沙坡头沙漠研究试验站, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

吕星宇(1993-),女,甘肃兰州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态学。E-mail:lvxingyu16@mails.ucas.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2018-05-30

修回日期: 2018-09-14

网络出版日期: 2019-09-29

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0504301）；国家自然科学基金项目（41471434）

收起

Recovery of Soil Microbe Quantities Dependent on Fine Particle Contents after Establishment of Sand-fixing Revegetation in Desert Region

Lv Xingyu ,
Zhang Zhishan

Expand

1. Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2018-05-30

Revised date: 2018-09-14

Online published: 2019-09-29

Fold

摘要

土壤微生物是荒漠生态系统的重要组分，参与成土过程与生物地球化学循环，其数量反映土壤质量，是判别退化生态系统恢复程度的重要指标。选取沙坡头固沙植被区土壤中的真菌、细菌、放线菌数量进行研究，分析了其时空分布、恢复特征及影响因子。结果表明：土壤微生物数量随固沙年限增加而增加，随土层深度增加而减少，夏秋季显著大于冬春季。三大类群微生物数量恢复曲线均呈现S型，在固沙植被建立18~24 a后恢复速率达到峰值，24~36 a后数量能够达到天然植被区的31.6%~83.7%。土壤微生物数量恢复过程主要受土壤细物质含量的影响，土壤pH是限制因子。土壤微生物对土壤状况与覆被变化敏感，能较早且敏感地指示生态系统功能的变化。

关键词： 固沙植被; 微生物数量; 恢复; 时空格局; 通径分析

本文引用格式

吕星宇 , 张志山 . 固沙植被区土壤质地与土壤微生物数量的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019 , 39(5) : 71 -79 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00087

Abstract

As an important component of desert ecosystem, soil microbes participate in the processes of soil-forming and biogeochemical cycle. Soil microbe quantities reflecting soil quality is an important index which can be used to determine the recovery degree of degraded ecosystems. We studied the quantities of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes with a restoration chronosequence in Shapotou sand-binding revegetation area, and analyzed their temporal and spatial distributions, recovery characteristics and their impact factors. The results showed that soil microbe quantities increase with increasing age of revegetation and soil depth. In general, soil microbe quantities were higher in summer and autumn than those in spring and winter. The recovery processes of microbe quantities followed S shape curve that the recovery rates reached to the maximum 18 to 24 years after the establishment of sand-fixing vegetation, and the microbe quantities reached to 31.6% to 83.7% of the natural vegetation area 24 to 36 years after the establishment. The microbe recovery processes were primarily influenced by the fine particle contents of soil and limited by soil pH. The results meant that soil microbes were sensitive to soil conditions and vegetation cover, and their fluctuation could make an early and sensitive indication of the changes in ecosystem functions.

Key words： sand-fixing revegetation; soil microbe quantities; recovery; temporal and spatial distributions; path analysis

参考文献

[1] 虎瑞,王新平,张亚峰,等.沙坡头地区固沙植被对土壤酶活性的影响[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(5):676-682.
[2] 李新荣,肖洪浪,刘立超,等.腾格里沙漠沙坡头地区固沙植被对生物多样性恢复的长期影响[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):173-181.
[3] 贾晓红,李新荣,王新平,等.流沙固定过程中土壤性质变异初步研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):46-50.
[4] Singh K,Singh B,Singh R R.Changes in physico-chemical, microbial and enzymatic activities during restoration of degraded sodic land: ecological suitability of mixed forest over monoculture plantation[J].Catena,2012,96(3):57-67.
[5] An S S,Huang Y M,Zheng F L.Evaluation of soil microbial indices along a revegetation chronosequence in grassland soils on the Loess Plateau,Northwest China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2009,41(3):286-292.
[6] Zhang W,Zhang G,Liu G, et al.Bacterial diversity and distribution in the southeast edge of the Tengger Desert and their correlation with soil enzyme activities[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2012,24(11):2004-2011.
[7] Liu Y,Xing Z,Yang H.Effect of biological soil crusts on microbial activity in soils of the Tengger Desert (China)[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2017,144:201-211.
[8] Liu L,Liu Y,Zhang P,et al.Development of bacterial communities in biological soil crusts along a revegetation chronosequence in the Tengger Desert,northwest China[J].Biogeosciences,2017,14(16):1-25.
[9] Li X R,Xiao H L,Zhang J G,et al.Long-term ecosystem effects of sand-binding vegetation in the Tengger Desert,Northern China[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12(3):376-390.
[10] Li X R,He M Z,Duan Z H,et al.Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert,northern China[J].Geomorphology,2007,88(3/4):254-265.
[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[12] 许光辉.土壤微生物分析方法手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[13] 袁志发,宋世德.多元统计分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[14] 陈祝春.沙丘结皮层形成过程的土壤微生物和土壤酶活性[J].环境科学,1991(1):19-23.
[15] 邵玉琴,赵吉.不同固沙区结皮中微生物生物量和数量的比较研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(1):68-71.
[16] 张威,章高森,刘光琇,等.腾格里沙漠东南缘可培养微生物群落数量与结构特征[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):567-577.
[17] 曹成有,朱丽辉,蒋德明,等.科尔沁沙地不同人工植物群落对土壤养分和生物活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):168-171.
[18] Zhang Z S,Chen Y L,Xu B X,et al.Topographic differentiations of biological soil crusts and hydraulic properties in fixed sand dunes,Tengger Desert[J].Journal of Arid Land,2015,7(2):205-215.
[19] 肖洪浪,李新荣,段争虎,等.流沙固定过程中土壤-植被系统演变[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(6):605-611.
[20] Anderson T H,Domsch K H.Application of eco-physiological quotients ( qCO 2, and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1990,22(2):251-255.
[21] Li X J,Li X R,Wang X P,et al.Changes in soil organic carbon fractions after afforestation with xerophytic shrubs in the Tengger Desert,northern China[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2016,67(2):184-195.
[22] Li X R,He M Z,Duan Z H,et al.Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert,northern China[J].Geomorphology,2007,88(3/4):254-265.
[23] Singh K,Singh B,Singh R R.Changes in physico-chemical, microbial and enzymatic activities during restoration of degraded sodic land:Ecological suitability of mixed forest over monoculture plantation[J].Catena,2012,96(3):57-67.
[24] Belnap J,Lange O L.Biological soil crusts:Structure,function,and management[J].Biological Conservation,2002,108(1):129-130.
[25] Zhang Z S,Dong X J,Liu Y B,et al.Soil oxidases recovered faster than hydrolases in a 50-year chronosequence of desert revegetation[J].Plant & Soil,2012,358(1/2):275-287.
[26] Darby B J,Neher D A,Belnap J.Soil nematode communities are ecologically more mature beneath late-than early-successional stage biological soil crusts[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2007,35(1):203-212.
[27] Caravaca F,Alguacil M M,Figueroa D,et al.Re-establishment of Retama sphaerocarpa as a target species for reclamation of soil physical and biological properties in a semi-arid Mediterranean area[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2003,182(1):49-58.
[28] Li X R,Xiao H L,He M Z,et al.Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions[J].Ecological Engineering,2006,28(2):149-157.
[29] 贾晓红,李新荣,李元寿.干旱沙区植被恢复过程中土壤颗粒分形特征[J].地理研究,2007,26(3):518-525.
[30] Dick R P,Rasmussen P E,Kerle E A.Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activities in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system[J].Biology & Fertility of Soils,1988,6(2):159-164.
[31] 邵玉琴,赵吉,朱艳华,等.科尔沁不同类型沙地土壤微生物类群的研究[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然版),2007,38(6):678-682.
[32] 王银亚,李晨华,马健.开垦对荒漠土壤微生物群落结构特征的影响[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(3):514-522.
[33] 李婷,张威,刘光绣,等.荒漠土壤微生物群落结构特征研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(2):329-338.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献