沙埋对河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带一年生草本植物的影响
收稿日期: 2020-09-09
修回日期: 2021-01-29
网络出版日期: 2021-05-26
基金资助
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41701045);山西省面上青年基金项目(201801D221336)
Effects of sand-buried on annual herbaceous plants in desert-oasis ecotone of Hexi Corridor Gansu, China
Received date: 2020-09-09
Revised date: 2021-01-29
Online published: 2021-05-26
一年生草本植物是荒漠绿洲过渡带人工固沙植物群落草本层的优势植物类群,由于风沙活动剧烈,风蚀和沙埋成为一年生草本植物生存的关键选择动力因素。以河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带典型一年生草本植物狗尾草(Setaria viridis)、虎尾草(Chloris virgata)、白茎盐生草(Halogeton arachnoideus)和雾冰藜(Bassia dasyphylla)为研究对象,通过0(对照)、1、2、3、5、10、15 cm深度沙埋试验,探寻沙埋对一年生草本植物的影响。结果表明:(1)4种一年生草本植物在0—1 cm埋深出苗率最高,狗尾草最大出苗深度为10 cm,虎尾草和雾冰藜为5 cm,白茎盐生草为3 cm;(2)不同沙埋深度下,4种一年生草本植物的生长(株高和总生物量)和繁殖(种子数量和百粒重)高值区位于2—3 cm埋深,3 cm往下虎尾草和雾冰藜存活率显著下降,而狗尾草仍保持较高存活率;(3)不同沙埋深度下,4种一年生草本植物的渗透调节物质(可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和游离脯氨酸)含量在2—3 cm埋深达到最高,丙二醛(MDA)含量高值主要位于3—5 cm埋深,叶绿素含量在1—2 cm埋深最高,2 cm往下开始降低;(4)一年生草本植物的生长存活与游离脯氨酸和叶绿素含量呈极显著相关关系,表明二者对保持植物叶片水分平衡和保证光合作用、维持植物正常生长起着更关键的作用。研究可为荒漠绿洲过渡带一年生草本植物恢复提供科学依据。
宋冰 , 王国华 , 缑倩倩 , 席璐璐 . 沙埋对河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带一年生草本植物的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021 , 41(3) : 185 -194 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00009
Annual herbaceous plants are the dominant plant groups in the herb layer of the artificial sand-fixing plant community in the desert-oasis ecotones. In order to assess the impact of the depth of sand burial on the emergence, growth and reproduction of annual herbaceous plants, the typical annual herbaceous plants Setaria viridis, Chloris virgata, Halogeton arachnoideus and Bassia dasyphylla were selected in a typical desert oasis ecotone of Hexi Corridor as the research object, through 7 sand burial depth experiments of 0 (CK), 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 cm and 15 cm, aiming to explored the impact mechanism of sand burial on annual herb. The research results showed that: (1) Four kinds of annual herb plants had the highest emergence rate at a depth of 0-1 cm, the maximum emergence depth of S. viridis was 10 cm, C. virgata and B. dasyphylla 5 cm, and H. arachnoideus 3 cm; (2) Under different sand depths, the growth (plant height and total biomass) and reproduction (number of seeds and 100-seed weight) of the four annual herbaceous plants were high in 2-3 cm. After 3 cm, the survival rate of Chloris virgata and B. dasyphylla significantly decreased, and S. viridis still maintained a high survival rate. (3) Under different sand burial depths, the content of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein and free proline) of four annual herbaceous plants reached the highest at 2-3 cm, and malondialdehyde (MDA) ) the high content was mainly located at the depth of 3-5 cm, the chlorophyll content was the highest at 1-2 cm, and then started to decreased after 2 cm; (4) Correlation analysis showed that the growth and survival of annual herb plants are extremely significantly correlated with free proline and chlorophyll content The relationship showed that the two played a more critical role in maintaining plant leaf water balance, ensuring photosynthesis, and maintaining normal plant growth. The research can provide a scientific basis for the restoration of annual herbaceous plants in the desert-oasis ecotones.
1 | 王涛,宋翔,颜长珍,等.近35 a来中国北方土地沙漠化趋势的遥感分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1351-1356. |
2 | 陈文,王桔红,朱慧,等.沙埋对河西走廊4种旱生植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1532-1537. |
3 | Maun M A.Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1998,76:713-738. |
4 | 王国华,赵文智.埋藏深度对梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):338-344. |
5 | Muna M A,Lpaierre J.Effects of burial by sand on seed germination and seedling emergence of four dune species[J].Amencan Journal of Bot-auy,1986,73(3):450-155. |
6 | Assche J A,Anlerbegrhe K A.The role of temperature on dormancy cycle of seeds of Rumer obtusifolius L[J].Functional Ecology,1989,3:107-115. |
7 | Vleeshouwers I M.Modeling the effect of temperature,soil penetration resistance,burial depth and seed weight on preemergence growth of weeds[J].Annals of Botany,1997,79:553-563. |
8 | 杨磊,王彦荣,余进德.干旱荒漠区土壤种子库研究进展[J].草业学报,2010,19(2):227-234. |
9 | 张金峰,闫兴富,孙毅,等.柠条种子萌发对不同光照强度和沙埋深度的响应[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(11):3262-3269. |
10 | 马红媛,梁正伟,闫超,等.四种沙埋深度对羊草种子出苗幼苗生长的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(12):2003-2007. |
11 | 王桔红,柴雁飞,张勇.沙埋对醉马草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(2):324-328. |
12 | 肖萌,丁国栋,汪晓峰,等.沙埋和水分对3种灌草植物种子萌发及出苗的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4): 106-111. |
13 | 赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对沙米幼苗生长及生理过程的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3367-3372. |
14 | 马洋,王雪芹,韩章勇,等.风蚀沙埋对疏叶骆驼刺(Alhagi sparsifolia)和花花柴(Karelinia caspica)幼苗的生理影响[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1254-1261. |
15 | 周瑞莲,侯玉平,左进城,等.不同沙地共有种沙生植物对环境的生理适应机理[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):340-349. |
16 | 何志斌,赵文智.黑河流域荒漠绿洲过渡带两种优势植物种群空间格局特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):947-952. |
17 | 赵文智,杨荣,刘冰,等.中国绿洲化及其研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(1):1-5. |
18 | 常学礼,韩艳,孙小艳,等.干旱区绿洲扩展过程中的景观变化分析[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(3):857-862. |
19 | 梁存柱,刘钟玲,朱宗元,等.阿拉善荒漠区一年生植物层片物种多样性及其分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):897-903. |
20 | 王永秋.降水变化对中亚荒漠一年生植物生活史的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2016. |
21 | 闫巧玲,刘志民,李雪华,等.埋藏对65种半干旱草地植物种子萌发特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(4):777-782. |
22 | 李秋艳,赵文智.五种荒漠植物幼苗出土及生长对沙埋深度的响应[J].生态学报,2006,26(6):1802-1808. |
23 | 刘冰.荒漠区灌木对降水脉动响应研究[D].北京:中国科学院, 2009. |
24 | Pammenter N W,Berjak P.Recalcitrant seeds:short-term storage effects in Avicennia merina (Forsk.) Vierh.May be germination-associated[J].Annals of Botany,1984,54:843-846. |
25 | 张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009:51-106. |
26 | Evenari M,Gutterman Y.Observation on the secondary succession of three plant communities in the Negev desert,Isereal:I.Atermisietum herbae albae[M]//Jacques R.Erudes de Biologie Vegetale.Paris:CNRS Gif Syr Yvette,1976:57-86. |
27 | Carol C B,Jerry M B.Seeds:ecology, biogeography,and evolution of dormancy and germination[J].Plant Ecology,2014:42-93. |
28 | Baskin J M,Baskin C C.The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds:A continuum[J].Bioscience,1985,35:492-498. |
29 | 刘志民.科尔沁沙地植物繁殖对策[M].北京:气象出版社,2010:113-121. |
30 | 薛海霞,李清河,徐军,等.沙埋对唐古特白刺幼苗生长和生物量分配的影响[J].草业科学,2016,3(10):2062-2070. |
31 | 王文娟,贺达汉,唐小琴,等.不同温度和沙埋深度对砂生槐种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1437-1442. |
32 | 温都日呼,王铁娟,张颖娟,等.沙埋与水分对科尔沁沙地主要固沙植物出苗的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(9):2985-2992. |
33 | Freas K E,Kemp P R.Some relationships between environmental reliability and seed dormancy in desert annual plants[J].Journal of Ecology,1983,71:211-217. |
34 | Bullock J.Plants[M]//Sutherland W J.Ecological Census Techniques:A Handbook.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1996:56-89. |
35 | Aarssen L W.Body size and fitness in plants:revisiting the selection consequences of competition.perspectives in plant ecology[J].Evolution and Systematics,2015,17(3):236-242. |
36 | Weiner J.The influence of competition on plant reproduction[M]//Doust J L,Doust L L.Plant Reproductive Ecology,Patterns and Strategies.Oxford UK:Oxford University Press.228-245. |
37 | 钟章成.植物种群的繁殖对策[J].生态学杂志,1995,14(1):37-42. |
38 | Susko D J,Lovett-Doust L.Variable patterns of seed maturation and abortion in Alliaria pertiolata (Brassicaceae)[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1998,76:1677-1686. |
39 | 路之娟,张永清,张楚.水分胁迫对不同基因型苦荞苗期根系生理特性及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(2):124-136. |
40 | 郄亚栋.水盐影响下的梭梭生理响应机制及其生态适应[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2018. |
41 | 李合生.现代植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002:413-437. |
42 | 赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对沙米幼苗生长、存活及光合蒸腾特性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5574-5579. |
43 | 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会.沙漠化的生物过程及退化植被的恢复机理[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:104-156. |
44 | 赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对两种沙生植物幼苗生长的影响及其生理响应差异[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(9):830-838. |
45 | 周瑞莲,赵彦宏,杨润亚,等.海滨滨麦叶片和根对不同厚度沙埋的生理响应差异分析[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):7080-7088. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |