藏锦鸡儿( Caragana tibetica )灌丛沙堆的形态与沉积物特征
收稿日期: 2023-08-07
修回日期: 2023-11-14
网络出版日期: 2024-03-19
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(42267073)
Morphology and sediment characterization of a scrub sandpile in Caragana tibetica
Received date: 2023-08-07
Revised date: 2023-11-14
Online published: 2024-03-19
研究各演化阶段藏锦鸡儿(caragana tibetica)沙堆沉积特征与灌丛形态之间的耦合关系,分析演化过程中藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆随时间的变化,阐明各演化阶段藏锦鸡儿灌丛与沙堆的关联性以及沙堆表层沉积物特征,可揭示藏锦鸡儿灌丛发育过程中沙堆的变化及其灌丛阻沙能力的变化。基于野外调查,在样地选取3个演化阶段(发育阶段、稳定阶段和活化阶段)的藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆,测量灌丛和沙堆的形态参数,研究沙堆与藏锦鸡儿灌丛之间的相关关系,然后对不同部位的沉积物进行采样,分析沉积物特征。结果表明:藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆形态以椭圆形为主,各演化阶段藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆长轴、短轴、沙堆高、水平尺度、底面积和体积都呈现活化阶段>稳定阶段>发育阶段。沙堆沉积物发育阶段整体粒级含量居中;稳定阶段灌丛坡顶细砂和粉粒含量较大,呈现逐渐增加的趋势;活化阶段颗粒含量高,沿迎风坡底—坡顶—背风坡底,峰值呈先增大后减少的趋势,间接体现了灌丛沙堆对沙粒的拦截作用。灌丛形态与沙堆沉积物各参数相关性在稳定阶段最大,说明灌丛与沉积物之间由于灌丛呈现椭圆形,灌丛在稳定阶段固沙能力最强。藏锦鸡儿在发育阶段由于灌丛较小,形态与沙堆沉积物各参数相关性不强。藏锦鸡儿灌丛与沉积物之间随演化过程的进行越来越不稳定。
关键词: 藏锦鸡儿(Caragana tibetica); 灌丛沙堆; 演化阶段; 形态特征; 土壤粒度组成
韩敏 , 高永 , 贺明辉 , 燕如 , 白芳 , 杨文源 , 李小乐 , 袁晓满 , 杨娟 . 藏锦鸡儿( Caragana tibetica )灌丛沙堆的形态与沉积物特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024 , 44(2) : 185 -195 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00097
To study the coupling relationship between the sedimentary characteristics of the sand pile and the morphology of the thicket of Caragana tibetica at each stage of evolution, to analyze the changes of the sand pile of the thicket of Caragana tibetica over time, to elucidate the correlation between the thicket and the sand pile as well as the characteristics of the sand pile surface sediment at each stage of evolution, and to reveal the changes of the sand pile and its sand-blocking ability of the thicket in the course of the development of the thicket of Caragana tibetica. The sandpile changes during the development of the Tibetan mallow scrub and its ability to block the sand. Based on the field survey, three typical thickets of the sandpile of Tibetan mallow scrub at different stages of evolution (developmental stage, stabilization stage and activation stage) were selected from the sample site, and the morphometric parameters of the thickets and the sandpile were measured to study the correlation between the sandpile and the Tibetan mallow scrub, and then the sediment characteristics were analyzed through the sampling of different parts of the sediments. The results showed that the morphology of the sandpile of the Tibetan Jindjir scrub was mostly oval, and the long axis (Ld), short axis (Wd), height (Hd), horizontal scale (HC), bottom area (Sd) and volume (Vd) of the sandpile of the Tibetan Jindjir scrub at each stage of the evolution showed the stage of activation>stabilization>development. The overall grain size content of the sand pile sediments in the development stage was intermediate; the fine sand and powder grain content at the top of the scrub slope in the stabilization stage was higher, showing a gradual increase; the particle content in the activation stage was high, and the peak value from the bottom of the windward slope - the top of the slope - the bottom of the leeward slope was showing a trend of increasing and then decreasing, which indirectly reflected the interception effect of the scrub sandpile on the sand particles. The correlation between scrub morphology and each parameter of the sand pile sediment was greatest in the stabilization stage, indicating that between scrub and sediment due to the oval shape of the scrub, the surface sediment indicated that with the evolutionary stage, its scrub had the strongest sand fixation capacity in the stabilization stage. The morphology of Tibetan brook trout is not strongly correlated with each parameter of sand pile sediments during the developmental stage due to the small size of the scrub. The correlation between the scrub and the sediments became more and more unstable as the evolutionary process progressed.
1 | Wang X, Zhang C, Zhang J,et al.Nebkha formation: implications for reconstructing environmental changes over the past several centuries in the Ala Shan Plateau,China[J].Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,2010,297(3):697-706. |
2 | Lang L, Wang X, Hasi E,et al.Nebkha (coppice dune) formation and significance to environmental change reconstructions in arid and semiarid areas[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2013,23(2):344-358. |
3 | 张梅.毛乌素沙地藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆形态特征[J].长春师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,38(6):72-78. |
4 | Zhang P, Yang J, Zhao L,et al.Effect of Caragana tibetica nebkhas on sand entrapment and fertile islands in steppe-desert ecotones on the Inner Mongolia Plateau,China[J].Plant and Soil,2011,347(1/2):79-90. |
5 | 杜建会,严平,俄有浩.甘肃民勤不同演化阶段白刺灌丛沙堆分布格局及特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(8):1165-1170. |
6 | 董雪,郝玉光,辛智鸣,等.浑善达克沙地3种典型灌丛固沙能力的比较研究[J].林业科学研究,2020,33(1):76-83. |
7 | 支莹,刘树林,康文平,等.浑善达克沙地锦鸡儿属(Caragana)灌丛沙堆形态特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(5):1438-1448. |
8 | 樊婷,张存厚,张德广,等.内蒙古自治区达茂旗荒漠草原土壤水分对降水的响应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):72-77. |
9 | 张存厚,崔崴,越昆,等.干旱半干旱区土壤水分对降水的脉动响应:以荒漠草原达茂旗为例[J].干旱气象,2023,41(2):260-267. |
10 | 党晓宏,魏亚娟,汪季.不同生境白刺(Nitraria tangutorum)灌丛沙堆形态特征[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(1):1-9. |
11 | Li Z Z, Wu S L, Chen S J,et al.Biogeomorphologic features and growth process of Tamarix nabkhas in Hotan River Basin,Xinjiang[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2010(2):205-218. |
12 | Folk R L, Ward W C.Brazos River Bar:a study in the significance of grain size parameters[J].Journal of Sedimentary Search,1957,27(1):3-26. |
13 | Wentworth C K.A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments[J].The Journal of Geology,1922,30(5):377-392. |
14 | 孙涛,贾志清,钱雅玲,等.民勤荒漠-绿洲过渡带不同发育阶段白刺灌丛沙堆的防风固沙功能分析[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2019,34(4):713-724. |
15 | 左合君,杨阳,张宏飞,等.阿拉善戈壁区白刺灌丛沙堆形态特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):263-269. |
16 | 罗维成,赵文智,任珩,等.不同气候区灌丛沙堆形态及土壤养分积累特征[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(2):191-199. |
17 | Cabrera-Vega L L, Cruz-Avero N, Hernández-Calvento L H A I,et al. Morphological changes in dunes as an indicator of anthropogenic interferences in arid dune fields[J].Coastal Education and Research Foundation,2013(8):1-12. |
18 | 张海娜,鲁向晖,黄国敏,等.鄱阳湖沙地蔓荆灌丛沙堆形态特征及空间分布格局[J].生态学报,2019,39(14):5252-5260. |
19 | 张璞进,杨劼,宋炳煜,等.藏锦鸡儿群落土壤资源空间异质性[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(2):338-346. |
20 | 迟旭,崔向新,党晓宏,等.吉兰泰盐湖绿洲柽柳灌丛生长与沙堆形态特征的关系[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(3):49-58. |
21 | 高永,丁延龙,汪季,等.不同植物灌丛沙丘表面沉积物粒度变化及其固沙能力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):135-142. |
22 | 谭凤翥,王雪芹,王海峰,等.柽柳灌丛沙堆及丘间地蚀积分布随背景植被变化的风洞实验[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(1):56-65. |
23 | 丁延龙.白刺灌丛沙堆演化对地表蚀积的影响及其作用机制[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019. |
24 | 李小乐,魏亚娟,党晓宏,等.红砂灌丛沙堆土壤粒度组成及养分积累特征[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(3):933-942. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |