img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索

绿洲农田中小型土壤动物多样性与功能群结构对土壤质地的响应

  • 方进 ,
  • 刘任涛 ,
  • 赵璇 ,
  • 杨敏
展开
  • 宁夏大学 生态环境学院/西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室培育基地/西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,宁夏 银川 750021
刘任涛(E-mail: liu_rt@nxu.edu.cn
方进(2000—),女,安徽滁州人,硕士研究生,从事土壤动物生态学研究。E-mail: fangjin200201@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-01-26

  修回日期: 2024-05-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-06

基金资助

宁夏重点研发计划项目(2021BEG03007);国家自然科学基金项目(32360318);宁夏自然科学基金创新群体项目(2023AAC01002);宁夏科技创新团队项目(2021RXTDLX01)

Responses of soil meso- and micro-fauna diversity and functional groups to soil texture of oasis farmland in arid region

  • Jin Fang ,
  • Rentao Liu ,
  • Xuan Zhao ,
  • Min Yang
Expand
  • School of Ecology and Environments / Breeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwestern China / Key Lab for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystems in Northwestern China of Ministry of Education,Ningxia University,Yinchuan 750021,China

Received date: 2024-01-26

  Revised date: 2024-05-14

  Online published: 2024-12-06

摘要

研究绿洲农田中小型土壤动物与土壤质地的关系,对保护农田生态系统多样性有重要意义。以宁夏干旱区绿洲农田为研究样地,调查了粉壤土和砂壤土的中小型土壤动物群落组成、多样性分布和功能群结构,阐明了中小型土壤动物群落结构对土壤质地的响应规律。结果表明:(1)土壤质地改变了中小型土壤动物群落组成结构。中小型土壤动物优势类群、常见类群的个体数和类群数均表现为粉壤土显著高于砂壤土(P0.05),而稀有类群的个体数和类群数均表现为两种质地土壤间无显著差异(P0.05)。(2)中小型土壤动物群落个体数和类群数表现为两种质地土壤间无显著差异(P0.05),但Shannon-Wiener多样性指数表现为粉壤土显著高于砂壤土(P0.05),而Simpson优势度指数表现为粉壤土显著低于砂壤土(P0.05)。(3)杂食性类群是粉壤土中小型土壤动物的主要营养类群,而植食性类群是砂壤土中小型土壤动物的主要营养类群。杂食性类群的个体数和类群数均表现为粉壤土显著高于砂壤土(P0.05);植食性类群的个体数表现为粉壤土显著低于砂壤土(P0.05),而类群数则表现为两种质地土壤间无显著差异(P0.05);捕食性类群、腐食性类群的个体数和类群数均表现为粉壤土显著低于砂壤土(P0.05)。(4)土壤粉粒和土壤含水量是影响中小型土壤动物群落组成、群落多样性以及功能群结构的主要环境因子。综上说明,中小型土壤动物的群落结构和功能群结构受到土壤质地的深刻影响,粉壤土由于具有较高的粉粒含量和含水量而维持了较高的中小型土壤动物群落多样性,且具有较为丰富的杂食性类群分布;而砂壤土则表现为具有单优势类群的分布特征,且以植食性类群为主。

本文引用格式

方进 , 刘任涛 , 赵璇 , 杨敏 . 绿洲农田中小型土壤动物多样性与功能群结构对土壤质地的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024 , 44(6) : 155 -166 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2024.00051

Abstract

It is of great significance to study the relationship between soil meso- and micro-fauna and soil texture in oasis farmland to protect the diversity of farmland ecosystem. Taking the oasis farmland in the arid region of Ningxia as the study plot, the community composition, diversity and functional groups structure of soil fauna in silty loam and sandy loam were investigated, and the response laws of soil fauna to soil texture were clarified. The results showed that: (1) The soil texture changed the composition of soil meso- and micro-fauna community. The number of individuals and taxa of the dominant groups and the common groups of soil meso- and micro-fauna in silty loam were significantly higher than those in sandy loam (P0.05), while there was no significant difference of the number of individuals and taxa in rare groups between the two soils (P0.05). (2) There was no significant difference in the number of individuals and taxa of soil meso- and micro-fauna community between the two soils (P0.05). The Shannon-Wiener diversity index of soil meso- and micro-fauna in silty loam was significantly higher than that in sandy loam (P0.05), while the Simpson dominance index in silty loam was significantly lower than that in sandy loam (P0.05). (3) The main trophic groups of soil meso- and micro-fauna in silty loam was omnivore, while those in sandy loam was herbivore. The number of individuals and taxa of omnivore in silty loam were significantly higher than those in sandy loam (P0.05). The number of individuals of herbivore in silty loam was significantly lower than that in sandy loam (P0.05), and there was no significant difference of the number of taxa between the two soils (P0.05). The number of individuals and taxa of predator and saprophage in silty loam were significantly lower than those in sandy loam (P0.05). (4) The soil silt and water content were the main environmental factors affecting the community composition, diversity and functional groups of soil meso- and micro-fauna. In conclusion, the community structure and functional groups structure of soil meso- and micro-fauna were profoundly affected by soil texture, and silty loam maintained a high diversity of soil meso- and micro-fauna community and had a relatively rich distribution of omnivorous groups due to its high silt content and water content. The sandy loam showed the distribution characteristics of a single dominant taxa, and the herbivorous taxa were the main ones.

参考文献

1 张卫信,申智锋,邵元虎,等.土壤生物与可持续农业研究进展[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3183-3206.
2 许文强,罗格平,陈曦,等.干旱区绿洲不同土地利用方式和强度对土壤粒度分布的影响[J].干旱区地理,2005(6):800-804.
3 苏永中,杨荣,刘文杰,等.基于土壤条件的边缘绿洲典型灌区灌溉需水研究[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(6):1128-1139.
4 张雪萍.土壤动物与环境质量关系探讨[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,1995(4):95-99.
5 Andres P, Moore J C, Simpson R T,et al.Soil food web stability in response to grazing in a semi-arid prairie:the importance of soil textural heterogeneity[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,97:131-143.
6 张武,张淑兰,顾成林,等.松嫩平原耕作草甸区中小型土壤动物群落特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(2):128-133.
7 柳泽鑫,区余端,苏志尧,等.土壤质地和pH值对节肢动物多度的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(7):150-154.
8 Mulder C, Boit A, Bonkowski M,et al.A belowground perspective on dutch agroecosystems: how soil organisms interact to support ecosystem services[J].Advances in Ecological Research,2011,44:277-357.
9 张晨晨.巩义市农业景观对土壤动物多样性及其取食活性的影响[D].郑州:河南大学,2020.
10 殷秀琴,陶岩,王海霞,等.我国东北森林土壤动物生态学研究现状与展望[J].生物多样性,2018,26(10):1083-1090.
11 宋英石,李晓文,李锋,等.北京市奥林匹克公园不同地表类型对土壤动物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(4):1130-1136.
12 Loranger-Merciris G, Imbert D, Bernhard-Reversat F,et al.Soil fauna abundance and diversity in a secondary semi-evergreen forest in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles):influence of soil type and dominant tree species[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2007,44(2):269-276.
13 白燕娇,刘任涛,常海涛.干旱绿洲区不同生长年限枸杞林地面节肢动物群落分布特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(9):1190-1199.
14 董炜华,王子婷,李锋瑞,等.黑河中游绿洲化过程中不同开垦年限农田大型土壤动物群落特征[J].地理科学,2014,34(10):1254-1261.
15 吾玛尔·阿布力孜,阿布都如苏力·吐孙,古丽布斯坦·努尔买买提,等.准噶尔盆地东南缘绿洲-荒漠交错带土壤动物群落特征[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(6):1617-1625.
16 周雷,曲潇琳,周涛,等.宁夏土壤颗粒组成特点及其影响因素分析[J].中国农业科学,2023,56(21):4272-4287.
17 吴克宁,赵瑞.土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):227-241.
18 尹文英.中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
19 钟觉民.幼虫分类学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1990.
20 李隆术,李云瑞.蜱螨学[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989.
21 林英华,朱平,张夫道,等.吉林黑土区不同施肥条件下农田土壤动物组成及多样性变化[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006(3):412-419.
22 伍一宁,许楠,王贺,等.模拟CO2浓度升高对三江平原中小型土壤动物多样性和功能群结构的影响[J].草业科学,2019,36(6):1641-1652.
23 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
24 常海涛,刘任涛,陈蔚,等.内蒙古乌拉特荒漠草原红砂灌丛林引入柠条后地面节肢动物群落结构分布特征[J].草业学报,2020,29(12):188-197.
25 白燕娇,李义学,刘任涛,等.干旱绿洲区枸杞林地面节肢动物功能群结构季节分布特征[J].生态学报,2022,42(15):6239-6249.
26 张阿娟,张健,李金金,等.轮伐期前后不同密度巨桉(Eucalyptus grandis)人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(3):808-821.
27 杜志琦,孟庆繁,冯立超,等.冷藏条件下土样保存时间对甲螨(甲螨亚目)和跳虫(弹尾纲)类物种分离的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(2):213-218.
28 林英华,张夫道,杨学云,等.农田土壤动物与土壤理化性质关系的研究[J].中国农业科学,2004(6):871-877.
29 林青霞,张化永,黄头生,等.冀北山地白桦林中小型土壤动物群落格局[J].东北林业大学学报,2023,51(2):97-103.
30 卢萍,徐演鹏,谭飞,等.黑土区农田土壤节肢动物群落与土壤理化性质的关系[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(9):1848-1856.
31 Heisler C, Kaiser E.Influence of agricultural traffic and crop management on collembola and microbial biomass in arable soil[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,1995,19:159-165.
32 李卓,冯浩,吴普特,等.砂粒含量对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):204-208.
33 张蕊,李佳,高梅香.玉米秸秆处理方式对冬季黑土农田蜱螨目和弹尾目群落结构的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8315-8325.
34 杨大星,董逸夕,李灿.喀斯特地区不同土地利用类型土壤节肢动物的群落结构:以贵阳市为例[J].贵州农业科学,2023,51(7):112-123.
35 刘任涛,李学斌,辛明,等.荒漠草原地面节肢动物功能群对草地封育的响应[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(8):2153-2159.
文章导航

/