Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2014, Vol. 34 Issue (2): 456-463    DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00338
    
Photosynthetic and Morphological Characteristics and Biomass of Five Glycyrrhiza Species
Ye Ju1,2,3, Lin Haiming1,3, Qiu Daiyu1,3, Zhang Hanping3,4, Wang Shengyuan3,4, Yan Liben3,4, Zhao Guiliang3,4
1. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. College of Chemistry and Life Science, Qinghai University for Nationalities, Xining 810007, China;
3. Biological Breeding Reserch Institute Radix Glycyrrhiza, Jiuquan 733101, Gansu, China;
4. Space-breeding Demomstration Base, Jiuquan 733101, Gansu, China
Download:  PDF (2116KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Diurnal photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content of upper leaves, morphological index and biomass of cultivated Glycyrrhiza uralensis, G. inflata, G. pallidiflora, G. glabra and G. eurycarpa were measured. The result indicated that: (1) Diurnal variations of net leaf photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, water use efficiency and stomatal conductance presented a bimodal curve patterns, the peaks occurred at 12:00 and 16:00, conspicuous midday depression phenomenon occurred at 14:00; intercellular CO2 concentration presented a W pattern, the peaks occurred at 08:00, 14:00 and 18:00, and the valleys occurred at 12:00 and 16:00. Leaf temperature presented a reversed V pattern change, the peak occurred at 14:00 while the valleys occurred at 08:00 and 18:00. Different differences existed among the diurnal mean values of the above photosynthetic factors. (2) Difference existed among chlorophyll-a content, chlorophyll-b content, carotonoid content, chlorophyll-(a+b) content and ratio of chlorophyll-a/chlorophyll-b for the upper leaves of the species, among which, significant difference existed in chlorophyll-a of the species. (3) Differences existed in branch number, leaf number, main stem height, main root length, aboveground dry weight, underground dry weight and biomass of the species. (4) Diurnal mean value of net photosynthetic rate was positively correlated with stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, water use efficiency, leaf temperature and chlorophyll-a content with coefficients of 0.984, 0.977, 0.927, 0.909, 0.933, respectively, but was negatively correlated with intercellular CO2 concentration with a coefficient of -0.972. G. uralensis has higher photosynthetic performance and yield, and is more suitable for large-scale cultivation in this region. The total biomass of G. inflata, G. pallidiflora, G. glabra are large, in addition to the underground parts for medicinal, should strengthen the development and utilization of the above-ground part. Photosynthetic performance, yield and total biomass of G. eurycarpa are low, but it is fresh and tender, so suggest to strengthen the development and utilization of animal husbandry.
Key words:  radix glycyrrhizae      cultivation      photosynthetic diurnal variations      photosynthetic pigment      biomass     
Received:  04 June 2013      Published:  20 March 2014
ZTFLH:  Q948.11  
Corresponding Authors:  蔺海明(Email:Linhm@gsau.edu.cn)     E-mail:  Linhm@gsau.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

Ye Ju, Lin Haiming, Qiu Daiyu, Zhang Hanping, Wang Shengyuan, Yan Liben, Zhao Guiliang. Photosynthetic and Morphological Characteristics and Biomass of Five Glycyrrhiza Species. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(2): 456-463.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00338     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2014/V34/I2/456

[1] 卢颖,刘仁权,王文全,等.应用因子分析探讨影响甘草地理分布的环境因素[J].中草药,2011,42(9):1822-1827.
[2] 祝玲敏,安文芝,谢建军,等.播种期对栽培甘草越冬性及根系生长特征的影响[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(3):469-472.
[3] 刘长利,王文全,崔俊茹,等.干旱胁迫对甘草光合特性与生物量分配的影响[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(1):142-145.
[4] 傅克治.中国甘草野生变家植[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1989:2.
[5] 张聿梅,许旭东,胡碧煌,等.黄甘草异黄酮成分的研究[J].药学学报,1997,32(4):301-304.
[6] 马君义,张继,姚健.相同栽培条件下4种甘草根中总黄酮含量的比较[J].中国医院药学杂志,2008,28(6):416-418.
[7] 向诚,乔雪,叶敏,等.利用数据库对甘草属植物化学成分的分类和分布分析[J].药学学报,2012,47(8):1023-1030.
[8] 贺润平,翟明普,王文全,等.水分胁迫对甘草光合作用及生物量的影响[J].中药材,2007,30(3):262-263.
[9] 赵则海,曹建国,王文杰,等.不同生长年限栽培甘草与野生甘草光合特性对比研究[J].草业学报,2005,14(3):111-116.
[10] 郭群,张景光,冯丽,等.不同除草制度对沙区栽培甘草生长发育的影响[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):697-702.
[11] 欧立军,陈波,邹学校.干旱对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(8):2612-2619.
[12] 王邦锡,黄久常,王辉.不同生长季节光照强度和温度对柠条叶片光合作用和呼吸作用的影响[J].中国沙漠,1996,16(2):145-148.
[13] 曹刚,张帆,任静,等.不同光质LED光源对黄瓜幼苗光合参数、 水分利用效率和叶绿体超微结构的影响[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(3):765-771.
[14] 徐文修,刘郁娜,胥新强,等.杏棉间作系统田间配置对生态因子及棉花光合生理参数的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(1):46-51,57.
[15] 林栋,马晖玲,冯朝阳,等.菊芋(Helianthus tuberoses)蒸腾特性与水分利用效率对光辐射和CO2浓度变化的响应[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(1):74-79.
[16] 谭会娟,周海燕,李新荣,等.珍稀濒危植物半日花光合作用日动态变化的初步研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):262-267.
[17] Patteron D T.Light and temperature adaptation[M]//Predicting Photosynthes is for Ecosystem Models (Vol I).Boca Ra-ton,USA:CRC Press,1980:205-218.
[18] Scholes J D,Press M C,Zipperlen S W.Differences in light energy utilization and dissipation between dipterocarp rain forest tree seedlings[J].Oecologia,1997,109:41-48.
[19] Su P X,Cheng G D,Yan Q D,et al.Photosynthetic regulation of C4 desert plant Haloxylon ammodendron under drought stress[J].Plant Growth Regultion,2007,51:139-147.
[20] 张永平,张英华,王志敏.不同供水条件下冬小麦叶和非叶绿色器官光合日变化特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(5):1313-1322.
[21] 靳甜甜,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.不同坡位沙棘光合日变化及其主要环境因子[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1783-1793.
[22] 叶子飘,于强.植物气孔导度的机理模型[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(4):772-782.
[23] 李六林,杨佩芳,田彩芳,等.树莓光合特性的研究[J].园艺学报,2003,30(3):314-316.
[24] 刘群龙,宁婵娟,王朵,等.翅果油树净光合速率日变化及其主要影响因子[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(3):474-478.
[25] 张兆斌.CO2、温度升高对柿幼树光合作用及水分利用效率影响的研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2009.
[26] 萧浪涛.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008:124-156
[27] 郑殿君,张治安,姜丽艳,等.不同产量水平大豆叶片净光合速率的比较[J].东北农业大学学报,2010,41(9):1-5.
[28] 王继安,宁海龙,罗秋香,等.大豆种间叶绿素含量、RUBP活性、希尔反应活力及其与产量间的关系[J].东北农业大学学报,2004,35(2):129-134.
[29] 郭春爱,刘芳,许晓明.叶绿素b缺失与植物的光合作用[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,42(5):967-973.
[30] Wells R,Schulze L L,Ashley D A.Cultivar difference canopyapparent photosynthesis and their relationship to seed yield insoybeans[J].Crop Science,1982,22:886-890.
[31] 杨莉,韩忠明,杨利民,韩梅.水分胁迫对蒺藜光合作用、生物量和药材质量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2523-2528.
[32] 刘春生,王朋义,王文全.中国药用甘草物种划分的分子基础研究[J].中国中药杂志,2005,30(22):1735-1738.
No Suggested Reading articles found!