Journal of Desert Research ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 249-257.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00145
Qinghe Niu1(
), Chunli Su2(
), Jianhua Xiao1, Bo Wang3, Lei Xia2, Qing Zhang1,4, Lulu Liu1,4
Received:2025-08-12
Revised:2025-09-18
Online:2025-11-20
Published:2025-11-26
Contact:
Chunli Su
CLC Number:
Qinghe Niu, Chunli Su, Jianhua Xiao, Bo Wang, Lei Xia, Qing Zhang, Lulu Liu. Impact of photovoltaic power stations on the aeolian sand environment of gobi in the Sugan Lake Basin, Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(6): 249-257.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00145
| 风向 | 月份 | 全年 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 合计 | 66.53 | 66.53 | 56.50 | 35.70 | 41.29 | 42.73 | 56.03 | 64.51 | 76.78 | 71.79 | 81.63 | 84.55 | 57.69 |
| N | 28.88 | 28.88 | 32.54 | 25.27 | 19.91 | 21.74 | 36.85 | 52.46 | 56.87 | 53.47 | 100.00 | 20.93 | 32.81 |
| NNE | 47.92 | 47.92 | 46.48 | 30.25 | 21.79 | 64.64 | 85.00 | 71.02 | 4.00 | 16.67 | — | 93.75 | 44.19 |
| NE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| ENE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| E | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ESE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| SE | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSE | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSW | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — |
| SW | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — |
| WSW | 83.33 | 83.33 | 63.64 | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 87.24 |
| W | 97.66 | 97.66 | 85.71 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 93.93 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 78.26 | 100.00 | 94.56 |
| WNW | 96.77 | 96.77 | 96.83 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 98.22 |
| NW | 100.00 | 100.00 | 94.74 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 95.17 | 97.62 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 98.37 |
| NNW | 77.78 | 77.78 | 87.73 | 46.23 | 88.09 | 47.69 | 54.04 | 62.05 | 91.82 | 73.17 | 100.00 | 83.87 | 66.77 |
Table 1 Reduction ratio of sand-driving wind frequency under different temporal conditions and wind directions
| 风向 | 月份 | 全年 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 合计 | 66.53 | 66.53 | 56.50 | 35.70 | 41.29 | 42.73 | 56.03 | 64.51 | 76.78 | 71.79 | 81.63 | 84.55 | 57.69 |
| N | 28.88 | 28.88 | 32.54 | 25.27 | 19.91 | 21.74 | 36.85 | 52.46 | 56.87 | 53.47 | 100.00 | 20.93 | 32.81 |
| NNE | 47.92 | 47.92 | 46.48 | 30.25 | 21.79 | 64.64 | 85.00 | 71.02 | 4.00 | 16.67 | — | 93.75 | 44.19 |
| NE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| ENE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| E | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ESE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| SE | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSE | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSW | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — |
| SW | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — |
| WSW | 83.33 | 83.33 | 63.64 | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 87.24 |
| W | 97.66 | 97.66 | 85.71 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 93.93 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 78.26 | 100.00 | 94.56 |
| WNW | 96.77 | 96.77 | 96.83 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 98.22 |
| NW | 100.00 | 100.00 | 94.74 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 95.17 | 97.62 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 98.37 |
| NNW | 77.78 | 77.78 | 87.73 | 46.23 | 88.09 | 47.69 | 54.04 | 62.05 | 91.82 | 73.17 | 100.00 | 83.87 | 66.77 |
风向与 输沙量 | 月份 | 全年 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 2 | ||
| N | 79.76 | 61.44 | 78.23 | 79.35 | 81.62 | 76.49 | 89.96 | 90.35 | 85.14 | 100.00 | 84.93 | 78.31 | 80.64 |
| NNE | 83.52 | 47.34 | 68.70 | 66.02 | 95.82 | 96.20 | 93.39 | 6.96 | -97.24 | — | 99.80 | 68.49 | 74.22 |
| NE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ENE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| E | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ESE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| SE | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSE | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSW | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | 99.97 |
| SW | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 |
| WSW | 93.98 | 55.49 | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 74.59 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.71 |
| W | 99.53 | 97.37 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.44 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.12 |
| WNW | 99.47 | 99.39 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.71 |
| NW | 100.00 | 99.93 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.44 | 99.80 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.90 |
| NNW | 84.31 | 81.21 | 75.37 | 97.38 | 92.64 | 92.13 | 86.10 | 99.53 | 99.42 | 100.00 | 82.07 | 100.00 | 91.08 |
| Q | 83.67 | 71.67 | 77.61 | 80.89 | 85.27 | 82.46 | 89.79 | 89.65 | 87.33 | 99.24 | 90.29 | 88.45 | 84.01 |
| RQ | 80.97 | 67.96 | 78.06 | 83.41 | 84.28 | 81.43 | 89.08 | 92.25 | 89.17 | 99.25 | 85.79 | 83.33 | 83.29 |
Table 2 Reduction ratio (%) of MPSTQ under different temporal conditions and wind directions
风向与 输沙量 | 月份 | 全年 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 2 | ||
| N | 79.76 | 61.44 | 78.23 | 79.35 | 81.62 | 76.49 | 89.96 | 90.35 | 85.14 | 100.00 | 84.93 | 78.31 | 80.64 |
| NNE | 83.52 | 47.34 | 68.70 | 66.02 | 95.82 | 96.20 | 93.39 | 6.96 | -97.24 | — | 99.80 | 68.49 | 74.22 |
| NE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ENE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| E | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| ESE | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| SE | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSE | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S | — | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 100.00 |
| SSW | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | — | — | — | 99.97 |
| SW | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | — | 100.00 |
| WSW | 93.98 | 55.49 | 100.00 | — | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 74.59 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.71 |
| W | 99.53 | 97.37 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.44 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.12 |
| WNW | 99.47 | 99.39 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.71 |
| NW | 100.00 | 99.93 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.44 | 99.80 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | — | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.90 |
| NNW | 84.31 | 81.21 | 75.37 | 97.38 | 92.64 | 92.13 | 86.10 | 99.53 | 99.42 | 100.00 | 82.07 | 100.00 | 91.08 |
| Q | 83.67 | 71.67 | 77.61 | 80.89 | 85.27 | 82.46 | 89.79 | 89.65 | 87.33 | 99.24 | 90.29 | 88.45 | 84.01 |
| RQ | 80.97 | 67.96 | 78.06 | 83.41 | 84.28 | 81.43 | 89.08 | 92.25 | 89.17 | 99.25 | 85.79 | 83.33 | 83.29 |
| 来沙方向 | 输沙量/(g·cm-1·a-1) | 电站内/电站外 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 电站外 | 电站内 | ||
| N | 61.63 | 1 062.40 | 17.24 |
| NE | 71.60 | 422.94 | 5.91 |
| E | 70.63 | 270.76 | 3.83 |
| SE | 40.00 | 317.00 | 7.93 |
| S | 54.15 | 553.01 | 10.21 |
| SW | 39.75 | 454.86 | 11.44 |
| W | 63.90 | 410.32 | 6.42 |
| NW | 18.15 | 518.31 | 28.56 |
| SUM | 417.29 | 4 009.58 | 9.61 |
Table 3 Comparison of field-measured unit-width sand transport rate inside and outside the PPS
| 来沙方向 | 输沙量/(g·cm-1·a-1) | 电站内/电站外 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 电站外 | 电站内 | ||
| N | 61.63 | 1 062.40 | 17.24 |
| NE | 71.60 | 422.94 | 5.91 |
| E | 70.63 | 270.76 | 3.83 |
| SE | 40.00 | 317.00 | 7.93 |
| S | 54.15 | 553.01 | 10.21 |
| SW | 39.75 | 454.86 | 11.44 |
| W | 63.90 | 410.32 | 6.42 |
| NW | 18.15 | 518.31 | 28.56 |
| SUM | 417.29 | 4 009.58 | 9.61 |
| [1] | Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.Renewables 2024 Global Status Report[R/OL].[2024-06-15].. |
| [2] | 国家能源局.国家能源局发布2024年全国电力工业统计数据[R/OL].[2025-01-21].. |
| [3] | 中国绿色时报.三北沙漠戈壁荒漠地区光伏治沙规划印发[R/OL].[2025-06-26].. |
| [4] | 朱震达,吴正,刘恕.中国沙漠概论[M].北京:科学出版社,1980:1-4. |
| [5] | 卢霞.荒漠戈壁区光伏电站建设的环境效应分析[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013. |
| [6] | 杨丽薇,高晓清,吕芳,等.光伏电站对格尔木荒漠地区太阳辐射场的影响研究[J].太阳能学报,2015,36(9):2160-2166. |
| [7] | Chang Z F, Liu S Z, Zhu S J,et al.Ecological functions of PV power plants in the desert and gobi[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2016,7(2):130-136. |
| [8] | 高晓清,杨丽薇,吕芳,等.光伏电站对格尔木荒漠地区空气温湿度影响的观测研究[J].太阳能学报,2016,37(11):2909-2915. |
| [9] | 刘世增,常兆丰,朱淑娟,等.沙漠戈壁光伏电厂的生态学意义[J].生态经济,2016,32(2):177-181. |
| [10] | 王涛.光伏电站建设对靖边县土壤、植被的影响研究[D].西安:西北农林科技大学,2016. |
| [11] | 赵鹏宇.光伏电板对地表土壤颗粒及小气候的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016. |
| [12] | 殷代英,马鹿,屈建军,等.大型光伏电站对共和盆地荒漠区微气候的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(3):15-21. |
| [13] | 陈曦,高永,翟波,等.沙区光伏电场的风沙流输移特征[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):684-690. |
| [14] | 王祯仪,汪季,高永,等.光伏电站建设对沙区生态环境的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):191-196. |
| [15] | 周茂荣,王喜君.光伏电站工程对土壤与植被的影响:以甘肃河西走廊荒漠戈壁区为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(2):132-138. |
| [16] | Liu Y, Zhang R Q, Ma X R,et al.Combined ecological and economic benefits of the solar photovoltaic industry in arid sandy ecosystems[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,262:121376. |
| [17] | 李培都,高晓清.光伏电站对生态环境气候的影响综述[J].高原气象,2021,40(3):702-710. |
| [18] | Uldrijan D, Kováčiková M, Jakimiuk A,et al.Ecological effects of preferential vegetation composition developed on sites with photovoltaic power plants[J].Ecological Engineering,2021,168:106274. |
| [19] | 王颖,李国庆,周洁,等.光伏阵列对土壤水分的影响研究[J].太阳能,2021(7):53-58. |
| [20] | Yue S, Guo M, Zou P,et al.Effects of photovoltaic panels on soil temperature and moisture in desert areas[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28:17506-17518. |
| [21] | 秦一凡.大型荒漠光伏开发对局地微气候-土壤-植被的影响研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2022. |
| [22] | 杨若婷,牛清河,屈建军,等.青海共和盆地固定支架式光伏阵列对阵内风场的影响[J].中国沙漠,2022,42(5):114-121. |
| [23] | Xia Z, Li Y, Zhang W,et al.Solar photovoltaic program helps turn deserts green in China:evidence from satellite monitoring[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,324:116338. |
| [24] | Mai F J, Bai R L.Discussion on PV desertification control scheme[J].Solar Energy,2023(1):30-34. |
| [25] | 田政卿,张勇,刘向,等.光伏电站建设对陆地生态环境的影响:研究进展与展望[J].环境科学,2023,4(1):239-247. |
| [26] | 鲍平安,季波,孙果,等.光伏电站建设对植物群落与土壤特征的影响[J].草业学报,2024,33(12):23-33. |
| [27] | 陈强,迟洪明,丁伟,等.腾格里沙漠南缘大型光伏基地植被保护和生态修复的理论与对策[J].中国沙漠,2024,44(5):123-132. |
| [28] | 乔慧.光伏电站风沙运动特征及植被恢复对土壤的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2024. |
| [29] | Song C C, Guo Z L, Liu Z G,et al.Application of photovoltaics on different types of land in China:opportunities,status and challenges[J].Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2024,191:114-116. |
| [30] | Wang Y M, Liu B L, Xing Y,et al.Ecological construction status of photovoltaic power plants in China's deserts[J].Frontiers in Environmental Science,2024,12:15. |
| [31] | 王怡雯,马瑶瑶,史培军,等.干旱区光伏电站运营对局地生态环境的影响[J].干旱区研究,2024,41(8):1423-1433. |
| [32] | 张呈春.宁夏荒漠地区光伏电站对微气候的影响及防风固沙效应观测与分析[D].银川:宁夏大学,2024. |
| [33] | 赵春黎,马文勇,张雅京,等.不同尺度下光伏电站的生态效应探讨[J].生态学报,2024,44(23):1-10. |
| [34] | 李森,赵京东,李泽东,等.沙漠、戈壁和荒漠地区光伏系统生态影响研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2025,15(2):709-716. |
| [35] | 刘坤,王波,张发国,等.光伏电站建设的生态效应:光伏治沙研究进展与展望[J].中国沙漠,2025,45(1):277-291. |
| [36] | 郭彩贇,韩致文,李爱敏,等.库布齐沙漠110 MW光伏基地次生风沙危害的动力学机制[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(2):225-232. |
| [37] | 唐国栋,蒙仲举,高永,等.沙区光伏阵列对近地层风沙输移的干扰效应[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(13):101-110. |
| [38] | 赵明智,吴丽玲,王帅,等.光伏阵列对沙漠风沙运动的影响研究[J].内蒙古工业大学学报,2022,41(2):137-149. |
| [39] | 付宁.沙漠光伏电站地表固沙效应及沙尘输运特征数值研究[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2024. |
| [40] | 豪宝尔.荒漠草原光伏电池板阵列对表层土壤风蚀的作用机理研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2024. |
| [41] | 李振洋,张宏伟,尚思汝,等.戈壁光热电站内风沙环境特征及运动规律[J].中国沙漠,2025,45(2):17-28. |
| [42] | Wang T, Liu B L, Tan L H,et al.Aeolian transport within a large-scale concentrated solar power plant in the gobi region[J].Geomorphology,2024,455(Jun.15):1-10. |
| [43] | 喻生波,屈君霞.苏干湖盆地地下水氢氧稳定同位素特征及其意义[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(1):169-175. |
| [44] | 张腾,苗运法,邹亚国,等.极端干旱区苏干湖湿地植被分类与变化分析[J].中国沙漠,2024,44(4):81-90. |
| [45] | 田敏,钱广强,杨转玲,等.柴达木盆地东北部哈勒腾河流域风况特征及其对风沙地貌发育的影响[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(1):1-9. |
| [46] | 凌裕泉.最大可能输沙量的工程计算[J].中国沙漠,1997,17(4):362-368. |
| [47] | 袁方,张振师,卜崇峰,等.毛乌素沙地光伏电站项目区风速流场及风蚀防治措施[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):287-294. |
| [48] | 屈准,韩庆杰,殷代英.塔拉滩光伏园区对局地气象条件的影响[J].地理研究,2025,44(7):1811-1825. |
| [49] | 赵延岩,应江,李振朝,等.戈壁光伏电站气象要素特征[J].高原气象,2022,41(4):977-987. |
| [50] | Zhang Z C, Dong Z B, Qian G Q,et al.Implications of surface properties for dust emission from gravel deserts (gobis) in the Hexi Corridor[J].Geoderma,2016,268:69-77. |
| [51] | 张正偲,潘凯佳,梁爱民,等.戈壁沙尘释放过程与机理研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2019,34(9):891-900. |
| [52] | 刘雅婧,王丹阳,常旭,等.光伏电站建设对西北荒漠区生态环境的影响研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2025,23(2):9-17. |
| [1] | Ke Meng, Zhongju Meng. Comprehensive benefit assessment of typical grid sand barriers for wind prevention and sand fixation in desert-area photovoltaic power stations [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(5): 360-368. |
| [2] | Qiang Zuo, Haotian Yang, Yiying Yang, Kai Lin, Yunfei Li, Yanli Wang. The construction mode of desert photovoltaic facilities influences the growth characteristics of sand-fixing herbaceous plants through soil moisture [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(3): 291-301. |
| [3] | Yunzheng Wang, Yimeng Wang, Jianguo Liu, Xiaowei Shang, Minlan Li, Benli Liu. Suitability zoning and ecological construction of photovoltaic power plants in Badain Jaran Desert and neighboring areas [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(1): 173-184. |
| [4] | Junyan Chen, Yawen Guan, Yue Zhang, Yu Chen, Hongru Bi, Gaotong Lou, Xinyang Guo, Yang Wang, Siyu Chen. Transport of dust from Gobi Desert to the Tibetan Plateau and its dynamic mechanism: a case study of a dust event in April of 2020 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(3): 158-171. |
| [5] | Jialong Ren, Jiliang Liu, Yongzhen Wang, Jing Fang, Yilin Feng, Anling Gao, Yuanxia Song, Weidong Xin. Response of ground arthropod assemblages to precipitation and temperature changes in the gobi desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(2): 207-219. |
| [6] | Yayun Li, Wei Cheng, Ning Wang, Xin Li, Rui Gao. Comparative study on the characteristic of spring sandstorms and the related meteorological factors of the Taklimakan Desert and Gobi Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 1-9. |
| [7] | Jiliang Liu, Wenzhi Zhao, Fengrui Li, Yibin Ba. Community dynamics of ground arachnid arthropods in a gravel gobi desert of the middle of the Hexi Corridor, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(3): 155-164. |
| [8] | Pan Kaijia, Zhang Zhengcai, Liang Aimin, Dong Zhibao, Li Xingcai. Nebkhas geomorphology in the gobi desert using the unmanned aerial vehicle and tilt camera [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 24-32. |
| [9] | Wang Youjun, Jia Jia, Gao Fuyuan, Lu Hao, Liu Hao, Xia Dunsheng. Magnetic Characteristics of Aeolian Sand and Ancient Underwater Sediments and Their Implications in Alxa Region of China [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(4): 626-634. |
| [10] | WANG Xun-ming, LANG Li-li, HUA Ting, ZHANG Cai-xia, WANG Zhen-ting. Gravel Cover of Gobi Desert and Its Significance for Wind Erosion: An experimental study [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(2): 313-319. |
| [11] | YE Yan-hua;LI Dong-liang;CHEN Xiao-guang. Response of Spring Precipitation in Loess Plateau to Surface Sensible Heat in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2007, 27(2): 315-319. |
| [12] | LI Sheng-chen;XU Liang;GUO Ying-xiang;QIAN Wei-hong;ZHANG Guo-qing;LI Chuan. Change of Annual Precipitation over Qinghai-Xizang Plateau and Sub-regions in Recent 34 Years [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2007, 27(2): 307-314. |
| [13] | MA Xiao-bo, HU Ze-yong. Precipitation Variation Characteristics and Abrupt Change over Qinhai-Xizang Plateau in Recent 40 Years [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2005, 25(1): 137-139. |
| [14] | ZHONG Hai-ling, LI Dong-liang, WEI Li. The Abnormal Sand-Dust Storm in Northern China during Spring and Its Response to Surface Sensible Heat on Qinghai-Xizang Plateau in Winter [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2004, 24(3): 323-329. |
| [15] | LIU Zhi-min, YANG Jia-ding, LIU Xin-min. Effects of Several Environmental Factors on Plant Physiology in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2000, 20(3): 309-313. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
©2018Journal of Desert Research
Tel:0931-8267545
Email:caiedit@lzb.ac.cn;desert@lzb.ac.cn
Support:Magtech