Journal of Desert Research ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 193-203.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2026.00058
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yuan Liu1(
), Peifang Chong1(
), Cai He2(
), Min Jin2, Fang Hu2, De Zhang1
Received:2025-11-15
Revised:2026-04-07
Online:2026-07-20
Published:2026-08-27
Contact:
Peifang Chong, Cai He
CLC Number:
Yuan Liu, Peifang Chong, Cai He, Min Jin, Fang Hu, De Zhang. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on the growth and physiological traits of Atraphaxis bracteata seedlings under salt stress[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2026, 46(4): 193-203.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2026.00058
| 处理 | 器官 | 鲜重/g | 干重/g | 含水率 | 株高/cm | 根冠比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 根 | 0.3462±0.063d | 0.2075±0.023c | 0.3860±0.040a | 29.6693±2.45b | 0.1863±0.022d |
| 茎 | 0.8920±0.035d | 0.4020±0.005c | 0.5484±0.012a | |||
| 叶 | 1.6288±0.033c | 0.5711±0.008d | 0.6488±0.012b | |||
| A1 | 根 | 0.6715±0.021ab | 0.3323±0.031b | 0.5057±0.039a | 31.05767±0.47b | 0.2778±0.029ab |
| 茎 | 1.0383±0.035c | 0.4060±0.006c | 0.6077±0.019b | |||
| 叶 | 1.8624±0.032b | 0.6343±0.005c | 0.6593±0.003b | |||
| A2 | 根 | 0.7970±0.049a | 0.4170±0.004a | 0.4733±0.028a | 33.0180±1.59ab | 0.3122±0.004a |
| 茎 | 1.2153±0.053b | 0.4791±0.006ab | 0.6038±0.023b | |||
| 叶 | 2.1345±0.033a | 0.6856±0.008b | 0.6786±0.008ab | |||
| A3 | 根 | 0.5984±0.013bc | 0.2919±0.013b | 0.5112±0.030a | 36.7207±1.86a | 0.2068±0.009cd |
| 茎 | 1.3817±0.019a | 0.4983±0.002a | 0.6392±0.004b | |||
| 叶 | 2.2060±0.079a | 0.7305±0.005a | 0.6681±0.011ab | |||
| A4 | 根 | 0.4959±0.041c | 0.2317±0.009c | 0.5239±0.054a | 29.5663±1.16b | 0.1914±0.010cd |
| 茎 | 1.0556±0.034c | 0.4244±0.030bc | 0.5989±0.016ab | |||
| 叶 | 2.1577±0.050a | 0.6309±0.008c | 0.7073±0.007a | |||
| A5 | 根 | 0.5080±0.059c | 0.2242±0.012c | 0.5440±0.069a | 28.5310±0.74b | 0.2503±0.026bc |
| 茎 | 0.7499±0.036e | 0.3389±0.032d | 0.5500±0.023a | |||
| 叶 | 1.4883±0.058c | 0.4541±0.023e | 0.6931±0.026ab |
Table 1 Changes in growth indicator of A. bracteata seedlings under salt stress after application of exogenous ABA
| 处理 | 器官 | 鲜重/g | 干重/g | 含水率 | 株高/cm | 根冠比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 根 | 0.3462±0.063d | 0.2075±0.023c | 0.3860±0.040a | 29.6693±2.45b | 0.1863±0.022d |
| 茎 | 0.8920±0.035d | 0.4020±0.005c | 0.5484±0.012a | |||
| 叶 | 1.6288±0.033c | 0.5711±0.008d | 0.6488±0.012b | |||
| A1 | 根 | 0.6715±0.021ab | 0.3323±0.031b | 0.5057±0.039a | 31.05767±0.47b | 0.2778±0.029ab |
| 茎 | 1.0383±0.035c | 0.4060±0.006c | 0.6077±0.019b | |||
| 叶 | 1.8624±0.032b | 0.6343±0.005c | 0.6593±0.003b | |||
| A2 | 根 | 0.7970±0.049a | 0.4170±0.004a | 0.4733±0.028a | 33.0180±1.59ab | 0.3122±0.004a |
| 茎 | 1.2153±0.053b | 0.4791±0.006ab | 0.6038±0.023b | |||
| 叶 | 2.1345±0.033a | 0.6856±0.008b | 0.6786±0.008ab | |||
| A3 | 根 | 0.5984±0.013bc | 0.2919±0.013b | 0.5112±0.030a | 36.7207±1.86a | 0.2068±0.009cd |
| 茎 | 1.3817±0.019a | 0.4983±0.002a | 0.6392±0.004b | |||
| 叶 | 2.2060±0.079a | 0.7305±0.005a | 0.6681±0.011ab | |||
| A4 | 根 | 0.4959±0.041c | 0.2317±0.009c | 0.5239±0.054a | 29.5663±1.16b | 0.1914±0.010cd |
| 茎 | 1.0556±0.034c | 0.4244±0.030bc | 0.5989±0.016ab | |||
| 叶 | 2.1577±0.050a | 0.6309±0.008c | 0.7073±0.007a | |||
| A5 | 根 | 0.5080±0.059c | 0.2242±0.012c | 0.5440±0.069a | 28.5310±0.74b | 0.2503±0.026bc |
| 茎 | 0.7499±0.036e | 0.3389±0.032d | 0.5500±0.023a | |||
| 叶 | 1.4883±0.058c | 0.4541±0.023e | 0.6931±0.026ab |
| 指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDA | 1.5098 | 1.8875 | -0.4907 |
| Pro | 2.5965 | -0.2064 | 0.6253 |
| SP | 2.1545 | -0.3027 | -0.3446 |
| SS | 1.6581 | 0.3893 | -0.7005 |
| ST | 0.2686 | 0.6522 | 2.4056 |
| SOD | 2.5544 | -0.4625 | 0.0707 |
| CAT | 1.6952 | 1.5345 | -1.0633 |
| POD | 1.8431 | 1.2368 | 1.0746 |
| 鲜重 | -1.2382 | 2.4134 | 0.0525 |
| 干重 | -1.3798 | 2.3142 | -0.0591 |
| 特征值 | 3.4146 | 2.5681 | 1.2130 |
| 贡献率/% | 34.1462 | 25.6811 | 12.1296 |
| 累计贡献率/% | 34.1462 | 59.8273 | 71.9568 |
Table 2 Factor load scale
| 指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDA | 1.5098 | 1.8875 | -0.4907 |
| Pro | 2.5965 | -0.2064 | 0.6253 |
| SP | 2.1545 | -0.3027 | -0.3446 |
| SS | 1.6581 | 0.3893 | -0.7005 |
| ST | 0.2686 | 0.6522 | 2.4056 |
| SOD | 2.5544 | -0.4625 | 0.0707 |
| CAT | 1.6952 | 1.5345 | -1.0633 |
| POD | 1.8431 | 1.2368 | 1.0746 |
| 鲜重 | -1.2382 | 2.4134 | 0.0525 |
| 干重 | -1.3798 | 2.3142 | -0.0591 |
| 特征值 | 3.4146 | 2.5681 | 1.2130 |
| 贡献率/% | 34.1462 | 25.6811 | 12.1296 |
| 累计贡献率/% | 34.1462 | 59.8273 | 71.9568 |
| 处理 | 根 | 茎 | 叶 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| A1 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
| A2 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.73 |
| A3 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
| A4 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.61 |
| A5 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.46 |
Table 3 Comprehensive evaluation of membership functions
| 处理 | 根 | 茎 | 叶 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| A1 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
| A2 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.73 |
| A3 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
| A4 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.61 |
| A5 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.46 |
| [1] | Li W Y, Guo Y, Wu R N,et al.Characteristics of water consumption of Atraphaxis bracteata A.Los.in the Mu Us Sandy Land of north central China[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2023,14(4):880-892. |
| [2] | 马宏文,杨少云,马小娟,等.不同留茬高度对沙木蓼种条生长的影响[J].现代农业科技,2023(19):110-112. |
| [3] | 闫磊,赵彦坤,何彩,等.沙木蓼组织快繁技术初探[J].甘肃林业,2023(1):41-43. |
| [4] | 何彩,刘伟,晋敏,等.沙木蓼育苗及造林关键技术探究[J].农业与技术,2023,43(15):74-77. |
| [5] | 刘世增,李昌龙,纪永福,等.甘肃省民勤连古城自然保护区沙木蓼种群的结构与动态[J].生态学报,2017,37(8):2763-2769. |
| [6] | He C, Jin M, Liu W,et al.The metabolomics and transcriptomics of Atraphaxis bracteata reveal age-related molecular alterations under naturally high temperature and drought conditions[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2024,176(1):e14129. |
| [7] | 常长越,颜宏,卢雨欣,等.植物盐胁迫研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2025,41(22):82-88. |
| [8] | 陈传亮,尚烨,闫庚洋,等.外源脱落酸对朝天椒幼苗生长和生理的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2024,30(23):22-26. |
| [9] | 张钰,陈慧,王改萍.外源ABA对楸树幼苗NaCl胁迫的缓解效应及其生长生理响应特征[J].西北植物学报,2023,43(6):996-1005. |
| [10] | 王艳萍,范宇浍,马华燕,等.外源脱落酸对水稻苗期根系形态建成及其诱导化感作用的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2024,30(1):126-132. |
| [11] | 刘涛涛,王雯,王言,等.外源ABA缓解干旱胁迫下马铃薯叶片损伤的生理机制[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2025,60(2):89-96. |
| [12] | Yan K, Bian T T, He W J,et al.Root abscisic acid contributes to defending photoinhibition in Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) under salt stress[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2018,19(12):3934. |
| [13] | 刘旭,林碧英,李彩霞,等.外源脱落酸对盐胁迫下茄子幼苗生理特性的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2020,54(2):231-236. |
| [14] | 张环宇.盐胁迫下外源激素对黄瓜幼苗生理特性的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2018(3):38-41. |
| [15] | 刘源,何彩,晋敏,等.沙木蓼幼苗在不同盐度胁迫下的生理适应机制[J].草业科学,2026,43(1):65-75. |
| [16] | 蔡文祺,李淑霞,王晓彤,等.外源褪黑素与乙烯交互对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].草业学报,2025,34(1):80-93. |
| [17] | 黄梦婷,刘文兰.盐旱胁迫下紫花地丁幼苗生理特性[J].草业科学,2025,42(5):1211-1221. |
| [18] | 马凯,饶良懿.盐胁迫下菊芋生长和生理指标对生物炭的响应[J].草业科学,2023,40(11):2879-2888. |
| [19] | 袁惠,张鲜花,韩禧卿,等.盐、碱胁迫对4份梯牧草苗期生物量及生理特性的影响[J].草地学报,2024,32(4):1184-1193. |
| [20] | 石诗叠,王华磊,罗春丽,等.NaCl胁迫对滇黄精幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].山东农业科学,2024,56(12):54-60. |
| [21] | 官秀玲,杨超,梅梅,等.蒙古栎苗木质量调控的初步研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2019,50(2):215-220. |
| [22] | 马斯琦,刘万峰,吕林,等.烟草中脱落酸的相关研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2020,41(1):94-100. |
| [23] | 汤日圣,黄益洪,唐现洪,等.生物源脱落酸对盐胁迫下辣椒苗生长和某些生理指标的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2009,25(4):856-860. |
| [24] | 王亚丽.外源ABA对盐胁迫下八棱海棠苗木生长及生理特性的影响[J].山西林业科技,2024,53(2):25-28. |
| [25] | Kefu Z, Munns R, King R W.Abscisic acid levels in NaCl-treated Barley,Cotton and Saltbush[J].Functional Plant Biology,1991,18(1):17-24. |
| [26] | 高英,伍柳芬,刘昊,等.盐胁迫下ABA对樱桃幼苗光合及生理特性的影响[J].天津农业科学,2023,29(3):8-13. |
| [27] | 熊海琳,田小霞,毛培春,等.外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下白三叶幼苗光合及生理特性的影响[J].草业科学,2025,42(7):1734-1745. |
| [28] | 王涛,唐天娇,廖佳元,等.外源ABA提高甘蓝型油菜抗镉胁迫能力和氮素生理利用效率[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(3):522-531. |
| [29] | 杨雯一.不同胁迫对各种植物体内抗氧化酶系统的影响综述[J].化工管理,2021(1):92-93. |
| [30] | 刘沂欣,隋晓青,王鑫尧,等.外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿的缓解作用[J].草业学报,2025,34(9):206-214. |
| [1] | Jing Pan, Lei Wang, Cuihua Huang, Quangang You, Pinglin Guo, qi Guo, Xian Xue. Review on effects of salt stress on plant energy metabolism processes in arid regions [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(1): 111-118. |
| [2] | Mengzhen Huang, Ruijie Lu, Jin Zhao, Luo Ma. Assessment of soil quality in typical wind erosion area of Qaidam Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(3): 199-209. |
| [3] | Duan Li, Jianhua Si, Jiyan Li, Peijiang Wang, Liming Yuan. Physiological responses and differences of Populus euphratica to salt stress and drought stress [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 205-215. |
| [4] | Meng Yan, Xuyang Wang, Liye Zhou, Yuqiang Li. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon in the process of desertification in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 221-231. |
| [5] | Haowei Jia, Changzhen Yan, Xuegang Xing, Jiali Xie, Kun Feng. Evaluation of ecological environment in the Dulan County based on the Modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index Model [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 181-190. |
| [6] | Wang Ying, Zhao Wen, Zhang Qiang. Evaluation of Agricultural Drought Vulnerability in Northern China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(4): 149-158. |
| [7] | Wang Xiaoyan. Hydrochemical Characteristics of Groundwater in Heihe River Basin, Shaanxi, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(4): 168-176. |
| [8] | Liu Shaofang, Wang Ruoyu. Advance in Research onPlant Salt Tolerance Improved by Plant-growth-promoting Rhizobacteria [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(2): 1-12. |
| [9] | Ren Jun, Sun Mengjie, Zhang Zhaoqi, Tao Ling. Effects of Exogenous Calcium on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Sophora alopecuroides under Saline Alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(1): 105-109. |
| [10] | He Zhaoquan, Zhang Tonghui, Liu Xinping, Zhang Xiaoxia, Zhang Rui. Response of Greenhouse Grape to Surface Mulching in Hexi Arid Region [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5): 1049-1058. |
| [11] | Feng Kun, Yan Changzhen, Xie Jiali, Qian Dawen. Spatial-temporal Evolution of Aeolian Desertification Process in Ordos City during 1975-2015 [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(2): 233-242. |
| [12] | Chai Wenmin, Li Yi, Su Shiping, Shan Lishan, Chong Peifang. Early Selection of Superior Families with High Drought-resistance in Nitraria tangutorum Based on the Physiological Indices [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(6): 1158-1170. |
| [13] | Luo Jun, Peng Fei, Wang Tao, Xue Xian, Huang Cuihua. Responses of Seed Germination and Seeding Growth of Halophytes Lycium ruthenicum to Salt Stress [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(2): 261-267. |
| [14] | Wang Yunchen, Xue Liang. Coordinated Development in Relation to Land Use and Ecological Environment in Xi'An [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(5): 1481-1488. |
| [15] | Yang Hongyu, Ping Haitao, Wang Di, Wang Li, Liu Yuhui, Bai Jiangping, Yu Bin, Zhang Junlian. Drought Resistance of Different Ploidy Potato Varieties [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(4): 1041-1049. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
©2018Journal of Desert Research
Tel:0931-8267545
Email:caiedit@lzb.ac.cn;desert@lzb.ac.cn
Support:Magtech