img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • Bimonthly 1981
Adv search

Distribution of Soil Carbon in Sand-binding Area and Its Relation with Soil Properties

  • Chen Yongle ,
  • Zhang Zhishan ,
  • Zhao Yang
Expand
  • 1. Shapotou Desert Research and Experimental Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2016-08-21

  Revised date: 2016-11-18

  Online published: 2017-03-20

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) are both crucial components of soil carbon. In arid and semi-arid regions, there exist at least as much as or more SIC than SOC, and it has a great potential for reducing the rate of atmospheric CO2 enrichment by increasing SOC and SIC sequestration. Studies involving soil carbon sequestration mainly focused on SOC in the first meter, or even shallower, and SIC was often neglected or underestimated. Revegetation, an effective method for controlling desertification and sequestrating carbon, has been wildly used in desert areas of China. However, knowledge about effects of revegetation on SOC and SIC distribution in both shallow and deep soils are still limited, as well as their relations with soil changes. In this study, we investigated the distribution of soil carbon from sand-binding areas established in 1964, 1981 and 1990 (Y64, Y81, and Y90), and adjacent moving sand dunes (Y0) in terms of concentration and density of both SOC and SIC along 0-3.0 m soil profile. The results showed that, in 0-0.1 m layer, SOC concentration increased from 0.29 g·kg-1 of Y0 to 1.95 g·kg-1 of Y64, and SIC concentration increased from 2.87 g·kg-1 of Y0 to 4.19 g·kg-1 of Y64. SOC concentration decreased as soil depth increased, while SIC concentration waved at a range of 2.44 g·kg-1 to 3.31 g·kg-1. The total SOC density in 0-3.0 m profile increased significantly from Y0 to Y64, and that in 0-0.4 m layer (0.18 to 0.52 kg·m-2) increased faster than 1.0-3.0 m layer (0.80 to 0.88 kg·m-2), thus the ratio of SOC density in 0-0.4 m layer (14.3% to 30.4%) significantly increased but that of 1.0-3.0 m decreased (64.8% to 51.6%). SIC density in 0-0.4 m and 1.0-3.0 m layer also increased from Y0 to Y64. According to redundancy analysis, soil fine particles (FPs), water availability (SWA), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), pH and electrical conductivity (EC) positively related to soil carbon density in 0-0.4 m layer, and these factors could explain 86.2% of variation in soil carbon density. The results of correlation analysis further showed that SOC density has significant positive relations with FPs, TN, TP, SWA and EC (P<0.001), while SIC positively related with all soil properties (P<0.05) except pH and EC. In addition, SOC density negatively related with soil water content in 0-3.0 m profile (P<0.01) and 1.0-3.0 m layer (P<0.05). Overall, our findings indicated that establishment of sand-binding vegetation are beneficial for accumulation of SOC and SIC in both shallow and deep soils, and changes of soil carbon closely related to soil properties.

Cite this article

Chen Yongle , Zhang Zhishan , Zhao Yang . Distribution of Soil Carbon in Sand-binding Area and Its Relation with Soil Properties[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017 , 37(2) : 296 -304 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00155

References

[1] Vesterdal L,Ritter E,Gundersen P.Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2002,169(1/2):137-143.
[2] Smith P M B,Ahammad H,Clark H,et al.Climate Change 2014:Mitigation of Climate Change.Contribution of Working Group Ⅲ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
[3] Lal R.Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J].Science,2004,304(5677):1623-1627.
[4] Post W M,Kwon K C.Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change:processes and potential[J].Global Change Biology,2000,6(3):317-327.
[5] Guo L B,Gifford R.Soil carbon stocks and land use change:a meta analysis[J].Global Change Biology,2002,8(4):345-360.
[6] Poeplau C,Don A,Vesterdal L,et al.Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone carbon response functions as a model approach[J].Global Change Biology,2011,17(7):2415-2427.
[7] 高亮,高永,王静,等.土地覆盖类型对科尔沁沙地南缘土壤有机碳储量的影响[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(5):1357-1364.
[8] 刘文亭,卫智军,吕世杰,等.土地利用方式对草地生物量分配及碳密度的影响[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(3):666-673.
[9] 潘根兴.中国干旱性地区土壤发生性碳酸盐及其在陆地系统碳转移上的意义[J].南京农业大学学报,1999,22(1):51-57.
[10] Sahrawat K.Importance of inorganic carbon in sequestering carbon in soils of the dry regions[J].Current Science,2003,84(7):864-865.
[11] Lal R.Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems[J].Environmental Management,2004,33(4):528-544.
[12] 潘根兴,曹建华.土壤碳及其在地球表层系统碳循环中的意义[J].第四纪研究,2000,20(4):325-334.
[13] 郑聚锋,程琨,潘根兴,等.关于中国土壤碳库及固碳潜力研究的若干问题[J].科学通报,2011,56(26):2162-2173.
[14] Mi N,Wang S,Liu J,et al.Soil inorganic carbon storage pattern in China[J].Global Change Biology,2008,14(10):2380-2387.
[15] Jobbágy E G,Jackson R B.The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation[J].Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):423-436.
[16] Shi Y,Baumann F,Ma Y,et al.Organic and inorganic carbon in the topsoil of the Mongolian and Tibetan grasslands:pattern,control and implications[J].Biogeosciences,2012,9(6):2287-2299.
[17] 翁伯琦,郑祥洲,丁洪,等.植被恢复对土壤碳氮循环的影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3610-3616.
[18] 杨渺,李贤伟,张健,等.植被覆盖变化过程中土壤有机碳库动态及其影响因素研究进展[J].草业学报,2007,16(4):126-138.
[19] 孙维侠,史学正,于东升.土壤有机碳的剖面分布特征及其密度的估算方法研究--以我国东北地区为例[J].土壤,2003,35(3):236-241.
[20] Harrison R B,Footen P W,Strahm B D.Deep soil horizons:contribution and importance to soil carbon pools and in assessing whole-ecosystem response to management and global change[J].Forest Science,2011,57(1):67-76.
[21] 苏永中,赵哈林,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地不同年代小叶锦鸡儿人工林植物群落特征及其土壤特性[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):93-100.
[22] 贾晓红,李新荣,李元寿.干旱沙区植被恢复中土壤碳氮变化规律[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):66-74.
[23] 许信旺,潘根兴,曹志红,等.安徽省土壤有机碳空间差异及影响因素[J].地理研究,2007,26(6):1077-1086.
[24] Li D,Shao M.Soil organic carbon and influencing factors in different landscapes in an arid region of northwestern China[J].Catena,2014,116:95-104.
[25] 李新荣,赵洋,回嵘,等.中国干旱区恢复生态学研究进展及趋势评述[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(11):1435-1443.
[26] 李新荣.干旱沙区土壤空间异质性变化对植被恢复的影响[J].中国科学(D辑),2005,35(4):361-370.
[27] 李从娟,雷加强,高培,等.人工防护林作用下风沙土成土过程的研究进展[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1227-1234.
[28] Su Y Z,Wang X F,Yang R,et al.Effects of sandy desertified land rehabilitation on soil carbon sequestration and aggregation in an arid region in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2010,91(11):2109-2116.
[29] 李新荣,张志山,谭会娟,等.我国北方风沙危害区生态重建与恢复:腾格里沙漠土壤水分与植被承载力的探讨[J].中国科学:生命科学,2014,44(3):257-266.
[30] Wang X P,Cui Y,Pan Y X,et al.Effects of rainfall characteristics on infiltration and redistribution patterns in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,358(1):134-143.
[31] Lal R.Sequestering carbon in soils of arid ecosystems[J].Land degradation & development,2009,20(4):441-454.
[32] Squires V,Glenn E,Ayoub A.Combating global climate change by combating land degradation[M].Nariobi,Kenya:UNEP,1995.
[33] Geesing D,Felker P,Bingham R L.Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development:Implications for global carbon sequestration[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2000,46(2):157-180.
[34] Li X R,Kong D S,Tan H J,et al.Changes in soil and vegetation following stabilisation of dunes in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert,China[J].Plant and Soil,2007,300(1/2):221-231.
[35] 杨黎芳,李贵桐,赵小蓉.栗钙土不同土地利用方式下有机碳和无机碳剖面分布特征[J].生态环境,2007,16(1):158-162.
[36] 赵洋,陈永乐,张志山,等.腾格里沙漠东南缘固沙区深层土壤无机碳密度及其垂直分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):206-210.
[37] Callesen I,Liski J,Raulund-Rasmussen K,et al.Soil carbon stores in Nordic well-drained forest soils—Relationships with climate and texture class[J].Global Change Biology,2003,9(3):358-370.
[38] Li X R,Zhang Z S,Zhang J G,et al.Association between vegetation patterns and soil properties in the southeastern Tengger Desert,China[J].Arid Land Research and Management,2004,18(4):369-383.
[39] Sala O,Lauenroth W,Golluscio R.Plant functional types in temperate semi-arid regions[M]//Smith T M,Shugart H H,Woodward F I.Plant Functional Types:their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1997.
[40] Groffman P M,Eagan P,Sullivan W,et al.Grass species and soil type effects on microbial biomass and activity[J].Plant and Soil,1996,183(1):61-67.
[41] Su Y Z,Wang J Q,Yang R,et al.Soil texture controls vegetation biomass and organic carbon storage in arid desert grassland in the middle of Hexi Corridor region in Northwest China[J].Soil Research,2015,53(4):366-376.
[42] Hopkins D,Sparrow A,Elberling B,et al.Carbon,nitrogen and temperature controls on microbial activity in soils from an Antarctic dry valley[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(10):3130-3140.
[43] Rousk J,Brookes P C,Bååth E.Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(6):926-934.
[44] Kemmitt S J,Wright D,Goulding K W,et al.pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(5):898-911.
[45] Noy-Meir I.Desert ecosystems:environment and producers[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973:25-51.
[46] 张定海,李新荣,陈永乐.腾格里沙漠人工植被区固沙灌木影响深层土壤水分的动态模拟研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3273-3279.
Outlines

/