img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • Bimonthly 1981
Adv search

Structure, benefits and behavior of farmers and herdsmen of the Kulun ecological economic circle in Mu Us Sandy Land

  • Hongmei Liu ,
  • Haibing Wang ,
  • Kuan Li ,
  • Xiya Liu ,
  • Yuyan Ren ,
  • Yandong Zhang
Expand
  • 1.College of Desert Control Science and Engineering / Key Laboratory of Aeolian Sand Physics and Sand Control Engineering,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010011,China
    2.Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Surveying and Mapping Geographic Information Center,Hohhot 010010,China
    3.Ordos Forest and Desert Scientific Research Institution,Ordos 017000,Inner Mongolia,China
    4.Inner Mongolia Otog Front Banner Forestry Bureau,Otog Front Banner 016200,Inner Mongolia,China

Received date: 2021-11-30

  Revised date: 2022-03-20

  Online published: 2023-01-17

Abstract

The Kulun eco-economic circle with "household" as the unit is the most basic production unit in the pastoral area of the Mu Us Sandy Land, which is closely related to the stability of the sandy land ecosystem and the development of the regional economy. Based on the land use data of Hukulun in 1986 and 2020 in Otog Front Banner and the ecological economy questionnaire survey data of 390 households in 2020, this paper clarifies the distribution law of ecosystem service value of Hukulun land and the economic circle structure pattern and benefit under different value backgrounds and general characteristics of the livelihood behavior of farmers and herdsmen. The results showed that the ecosystem service value of Hukulun showed a normal distribution pattern, with a distribution range of 0-450 million yuan, of which the middle-low (0.5-3 million yuan) and medium-high (3-7 million yuan) value Hukulun accounted for a substantial part in the whole banner. The proportions were the highest (59.04%, 23.17%); low (0-0.5 million yuan) and high (7 million yuan or more) value households have low proportions(12.43%, 5.36%); the Kulun eco-economic circle was dominated by animal husbandry. In the development model of agro-forestry-grass-animal complex ecological industry supplemented by agriculture and forestry, the economic benefits increased with the increase of the ecosystem service value of Kulun land; the consumption expenditure structure of farmers and herdsmen was similar, and the proportion of agricultural and animal husbandry production input, etiquette and transportation expensed high, accounting for 37.92%, 22.71%, 13.28%, and gradually increased with the increase of income; the regional ecological environment has improved significantly in the past 35 years, greatly improving the economic benefits and living standards of farmers and herdsmen.

Cite this article

Hongmei Liu , Haibing Wang , Kuan Li , Xiya Liu , Yuyan Ren , Yandong Zhang . Structure, benefits and behavior of farmers and herdsmen of the Kulun ecological economic circle in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023 , 43(1) : 48 -57 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00109

References

1 Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A.Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2013,110:3665-3672.
2 邰秀军,芦利广,杨鑫,等.沙化区生态移民的沙化感知、社会影响和适应性策略[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(3):168-176.
3 Lee E H.Recent increasing trend in dust frequency over Mongolia and Inner Mongolia regions and its association with climate and surface condition change[J].Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(27):4611-4616.
4 柴珊,柴建国.牧区风沙区水土流失与草库伦建设[J].中国水土保持,2003(6):24-32.
5 包哈达.加快草库伦建设全面保护黑土地[J].中国水土保持,2003(11):17-18.
6 洪传春,刘某承,李文华.农林复合经营:中国生态农业发展的有效模式[J].农村经济,2015(3):37-41.
7 Ayhan A, Turkay T, Sultan B,et al.Resident perceptions of livelihood impacts arising from the Kozlldag National Park,Turkey[J].Environment Development and Sustainability,2018(20):1037-1052.
8 李同昇,陈谢扬,芮旸,等.西北地区生态保护与高质量发展协同推进的策略和路径[J].经济地理,2021,41(10):154-164.
9 哈斯巴根,李和平,杨燕山.家庭草库伦产业结构分析和效益评价[J].中国草地,1994(1):52-57.
10 Grossman G M, Krueger A B.Economic growth and the environment[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377.
11 孙特生,胡晓慧.基于农牧民生计资本的干旱区草地适应性管理:以准噶尔北部的富蕴县为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(5):761-774.
12 Wang W W, Fanc C.Migrant workers' integration in urban China:experiences in employment,social adaptation,and selfidentity[J].Eurasian Geography and Economics,2012,53(6):731-749.
13 刘娟,刘华民,卓义,等.毛乌素沙地1990-2014年景观格局变化及驱动力[J].草业科学,2017,34(2):255-263.
14 Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
15 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
16 朱利凯,蒙吉军,刘洋,等.农牧交错区农牧户生计与土地利用:以内蒙古鄂尔多斯市乌审旗为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2011,47(1):133-140.
17 李靖,廖和平.区域贫困农户生计能力与生态环境的关系:以重庆市16个区县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(9):175-182.
18 刘铮瑶,董治宝,刘永林,等.毛乌素沙地沙产业发展条件[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(4):881-888.
19 Raworth K.Why it's time for doughnut economics[J].IPPR Progressive Review,2017,24(3):216-222.
20 Fodha M, Zaghdoud O.Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia:an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets Curve[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(2):1150-1156.
21 刘志民,余海滨.“山水林田湖草沙生命共同体”理念下的科尔沁沙地生态治理[J].中国沙漠,2022,42(1):34-40.
Outlines

/