img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • Bimonthly 1981
Adv search

Sustainability assessment of human-earth systems from ecosystem service supply-demand perspectivesevidence from Horqin Sandy LandChina

  • Jianpeng Zhang ,
  • Luming Lei ,
  • Yuqiang Li ,
  • Tianai Li ,
  • Xueyong Zhao ,
  • Haotong Ren ,
  • Hong Jia ,
  • Yangyang Wang ,
  • Lihan Cui
Expand
  • 1.School of Economics and Management,Inner Mongolia University,Hohhot 010021,China
    2.Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China
    3.Naiman Desertification Research Station,Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China
    4.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
    5.Faculty of Geographical Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
    6.Remote Sensing Division,Aerospace Information Applications Co. ,Ltd. ,China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation,Beijing 100071,China
    7.School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,Zhejiang,China

Received date: 2025-05-31

  Revised date: 2025-07-10

  Online published: 2025-08-18

Abstract

Understanding ecosystem service (ES) supply-demand relationships is crucial for scientifically evaluating human-ecosystem interdependencies and regional sustainability, thereby informing resource management and ecological conservation strategies. As a representative agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China, Horqin Sandy Land faces severe ecological challenges, yet comprehensive assessments of ES flows and human-earth system sustainability remain scarce. This study developed Ecosystem Service Supply (ESSI) and Human Demand (HMDI) indices to quantify ES evolution and spatial matching patterns (2000-2023), evaluating sustainability through supply-demand balance diagnostics. Key findings reveal: (1) Grasslands contributed most significantly to ES provision, with supply services and regulation services stabilizing post-2005 after earlier fluctuations; (2) Spatially consistent patterns featured accelerated demand growth along functional zone peripheries, contrasting with declining internal supply; (3) Pronounced spatial mismatches emerged, particularly low-supply/high-demand zones (29%) concentrated in southern-eastern sectors; (4) Limited sustainability transitions occurred (2.55% significant degradation vs. 2.96% improvement); (5) Synergistic areas dominated (79.94%), characterized predominantly by negative synergies (concurrent ES-demand declines), while trade-offs were minimized within functional zones.

Cite this article

Jianpeng Zhang , Luming Lei , Yuqiang Li , Tianai Li , Xueyong Zhao , Haotong Ren , Hong Jia , Yangyang Wang , Lihan Cui . Sustainability assessment of human-earth systems from ecosystem service supply-demand perspectivesevidence from Horqin Sandy LandChina[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025 , 45(4) : 176 -189 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00113

References

[1] Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R,et al.Complexity of coupled human and natural systems[J].Science2007317(5844):1513-1516.
[2] Liu H, Fang C, Fang K.Coupled human and natural cube:a novel framework for analyzing the multiple interactions between humans and nature[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences202030(3):355-377.
[3] 樊杰.“人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J].地理学报201873(4):597-607.
[4] Clark W C.Sustainability science:a room of its own[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2007104(6):1737.
[5] Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstr?m J,et al.The emergence and evolution of earth system science[J].Nature Reviews Earth & Environment20201(1):54-63.
[6] Fu B.Coupling human and natural systems for sustainable development[J].National Science Review202310(7):86.
[7] 吴传钧.论地理学的研究核心:人地关系地域系统[J].经济地理1991(3):1-6.
[8] Steffen W, Rockstr?m J, Richardson K,et al.Trajectories of the earth system in the anthropocene[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2018115(33):8252-8259.
[9] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J,et al.Human domination of earth's ecosystems[J].Science1997277(5325):494-499.
[10] Keys P W, Galaz V, Dyer M,et al.Anthropocene risk[J].Nature Sustainability20192(8):667-673.
[11] O’neill D W, Fanning A L, Lamb W F,et al.A good life for all within planetary boundaries[J].Nature Sustainability20181(2):88-95.
[12] Izdebski A, Czerwiński S, Jankowiak M,et al.Unbalanced social-ecological acceleration led to state formation failure in early medieval Poland[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2025122(18):e2409056122.
[13] ?u?ek L, Kleme? J J, Kravanja Z.A review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability[J].Journal of Cleaner Production201234:9-20.
[14] Brown K.Global environmental change II:Planetary boundaries:A safe operating space for human geographers?[J].Progress in Human Geography201741(1):118-130.
[15] Fan J, Wang Y, Ouyang Z,et al.Risk forewarning of regional development sustainability based on a natural resources and environmental carrying index in China[J].Earth's Future20175(2):196-213.
[16] Fu B, Wu X, Wang Z,et al.Coupling human and natural systems for sustainability:experience from China's Loess Plateau[J].Earth System Dynamics202213(2):795-808.
[17] Raworth K.A Doughnut for the Anthropocene:humanity's compass in the 21st century[J].The Lancet Planetary Health20171(2):48-49.
[18] 刘海猛,方创琳,李咏红.城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J].地理学报201974(8):1489-1507.
[19] Ji Q, Feng X, Sun S,et al.Cross-scale coupling of ecosystem service flows and socio-ecological interactions in the Yellow River Basin[J].Journal of Environmental Management2024367:122071.
[20] 赵文武,刘月,冯强,等.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J].地理科学进展201837(1):139-151.
[21] Costanza R, De Groot R, Braat L,et al.Twenty years of ecosystem services:How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J].Ecosystem Services201728:1-16.
[22] Costanza R, D'arge R, De Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature1997387(6630):253-260.
[23] Cord A F, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M,et al.Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies:main concepts,methods and the road ahead[J].Ecosystem Services201728:64-72.
[24] Han Y, Edwin I E, Wang Y,et al.A carbon-centered framework for ecosystem service supply-demand analysis in arid China:insights for ecological zoning under dual carbon goals[J].Journal of Cleaner Production2025518:145901.
[25] Dang L, Zhao F, Teng Y,et al.Scale dependency of trade-offs/synergies analysis of ecosystem services based on Bayesian Belief Networks:a case of the Yellow River Basin[J].Journal of Environmental Management2025375:124410.
[26] 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,等.北方农牧交错带的地理界定及其生态问题[J].地球科学进展2002(5):739-747.
[27] 刘二燕,赵媛媛,周蝶,等.科尔沁-浑善达克沙地2000-2020年土地沙化时空变化格局[J].中国沙漠202444(4):46-56.
[28] 李玉强,王旭洋,郑成卓,等.科尔沁沙地防沙治沙实践与生态可持续修复浅议[J].中国沙漠202444(4):302-314.
[29] 张柏忠.北魏以前科尔沁沙地的变迁[J].中国沙漠19899(4):40-48.
[30] Niu L, Shao Q, Ning J,et al.The assessment of ecological restoration effects on Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project area during 2000-2019[J].Ecological Engineering2023186:106831.
[31] 黄晓霞,程宏,蒋宁,等.京津风沙源治理对生态系统服务的影响及其效益核算[J].科学通报202368(11):1367-1380.
[32] 张建鹏,李玉强,赵学勇,等.围封对沙漠化草地土壤理化性质和固碳潜力恢复的影响[J].中国沙漠201737(3):491-499.
[33] Zheng X, Zhu J, Wang G G,et al.Assessing the ecological effects of the world's largest forestry eco-engineering:three-north protective forest program within the initially scheduled range from 1978 to 2022[J].Science China Life Sciences202568(2):314-327.
[34] 金海珍,于德永,郝蕊芳,等.科尔沁沙地关键生态系统服务的约束关系分析[J].生态学报202141(18):7249-7259.
[35] 张丽,刘佳雨.近30年东北沙地生态系统服务动态[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文)202321(1):139-148.
[36] 刘志民,余海滨,汪海洋.科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙”一体化治理原理及实施重点[J].应用生态学报202233(12):3441-3447.
[37] Zhu W, Zhang Z, Zhang H,et al.Integrating spatial patterns and driving factors of cultural ecosystem services into territorial spatial governance:a case study of the Horqin Sandy Land with multi-ethnic settlements[J].Habitat International2024148:103093.
[38] Zhu W, Gao Y, Zhang H,et al.Optimization of the land use pattern in Horqin Sandy Land by using the CLUMondo model and Bayesian belief network[J].Science of The Total Environment2020739:139929.
[39] Xie G, Zhang C, Zhen L,et al.Dynamic changes in the value of China's ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem Services201726:46-54.
[40] 黄子璇,史达,马淑花.中国旅游经济与生态系统服务协调效应及其障碍因素研究[J].旅游学刊202439(4):93-108.
[41] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报201530(8):1243-1254.
[42] 乔碩,王海兵,左合君,等.毛乌素沙地绿洲化过程中生态服务价值及生态网络格局演变[J].中国沙漠202242(3):1181-26.
[43] 巴之丹.改革开放以来中国沙漠地区土地利用与生态系统服务价值变化研究[D]四平:吉林师范大学,2023.
[44] 张天琪,杨光,刘峰,等.呼伦贝尔沙地2000-2020年土地利用变化及生态服务价值[J].水土保持通报202141(4):331-338.
[45] Liu H, Xing L, Wang C,et al.Sustainability assessment of coupled human and natural systems from the perspective of the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J].Frontiers in Earth Science202210:1025787.
[46] Ouyang X, Tang L, Wei X,et al.Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations[J].Land Use Policy2021109:105587.
[47] Mu H, Li X, Wen Y,et al.A global record of annual terrestrial human footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018[J].Scientific Data20229(1):176.
[48] Rockstr?m J, Steffen W, Noone K,et al.A safe operating space for humanity[J].Nature2009461(7263):472-475.
[49] Raworth K.Doughnut Economics:Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist[M].New York,USA:Random House Business,2017.
[50] Yuan Z, Liang Y, Zhao H,et al.Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau[J].Ecological Indicators2024158:111384.
[51] 卢建男,李玉强,赵学勇,等.半干旱区典型沙地生态环境演变特征及沙漠化防治建议[J].中国沙漠202444(4):284-292.
[52] Liu H, Cheng Y, Liu Z,et al.Conflict or coordination? The spatiotemporal relationship between humans and nature on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Earth's Future202311(9):e2022EF003452.
[53] Wang J, Zhai T, Lin Y,et al.Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China[J].Science of The Total Environment2019657:781-791.
Outlines

/