img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • Bimonthly 1981
Adv search

Comprehensive benefit assessment of typical grid sand barriers for wind prevention and sand fixation in desert-area photovoltaic power stations

  • Ke Meng ,
  • Zhongju Meng
Expand
  • 1.University of California,La Jolla 92122,San Diego,USA
    2.College of Desert Control Science and Engineering,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010018,China

Received date: 2025-07-21

  Revised date: 2025-09-01

  Online published: 2025-09-27

Abstract

During the large-scale construction of photovoltaic (PV) power stations in desert regions, the areas beneath the panels often experience secondary wind erosion and sand accumulation due to ground surface disturbance and altered wind flow patterns. These issues seriously threaten ecological recovery and the safety of operational maintenance. To evaluate the windbreak and sand-stabilizing effects of different types of mechanical sand barriers in PV fields, this study selected three typical sand barriers, straw checkerboard, degradable polylactic acid (PLA), and high-density polyethylene (mesh), within a PV power station located in the Hobq Desert as the experimental site. The wind speed profile near the surface, surface roughness, and friction velocity under varying wind conditions were analyzed to systematically examine the influence of sand barrier type on wind speed modulation and surface stability. The results indicated that: (1) All three types of sand barriers significantly reduced wind speed within the 0-20 cm near-surface layer, with the mesh barrier showing the highest wind reduction efficiency up to 50% at the 10 cm height. (2) The installation of sand barriers markedly increased surface roughness and enhanced wind speed shear resistance, with the straw checkerboard demonstrating particularly notable effects. (3) All sand barriers effectively increased the friction velocity, with an average improvement ranging from 30% to 68% under wind speeds between 7.85 m·s-1 and 12.03 m·s-1. (4) Implementing sand barrier measures in the 200 MW PV power station reduced the average annual power generation loss rate to 2.9%. Furthermore, the annual panel cleaning costs were reduced by an average of ¥97 300 with the installation of the three types of sand barriers. Economic evaluation revealed that straw checkerboard barriers offer advantages such as low cost and wide material availability, whereas mesh barriers combine high wind reduction efficiency with durability. PLA barriers exhibited exceptional sand-fixing performance owing to their superior ground conformity. The findings provide a theoretical basis and technical support for controlling secondary wind-sand hazards in PV power stations situated in sandy areas.

Cite this article

Ke Meng , Zhongju Meng . Comprehensive benefit assessment of typical grid sand barriers for wind prevention and sand fixation in desert-area photovoltaic power stations[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025 , 45(5) : 360 -368 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00135

References

[1] 王宇波,王雅鹏.我国能源危机的诱因与应对策略[J].中外能源2007(3):15-18.
[2] 张小艳.能源利用与能源开发[J].能源工程2001(5):48-51.
[3] 刘坤,王波,张发国,等.光伏电站建设的生态效应:光伏治沙研究进展与展望[J].中国沙漠202545(1):277-291.
[4] 唐国栋.沙区光伏阵列地表形变规律及其动力学机制[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.
[5] 文立菊.基于RSEI指数的光伏电站对荒漠生态环境的影响研究[J].环境科学与管理202550(8):73-78.
[6] 杨世荣.库布齐沙漠光伏电站风沙运动及蚀积特征研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019.
[7] 聂英才,范长春,冯建文,等.光伏治沙模式效益综合评估研究[J].电力科学与工程202541(4):28-34.
[8] 马泽,蒙仲举,罗建国,等.乌兰布和沙漠典型沿黄段格状沙障防风固沙效应[J].水土保持通报202444(2):1-10.
[9] Wiggs G F S.Desert dune dynamics and the evaluation of shear velocity:an integrated approach[J].Geological Society,London,Special Publications,199372(1):37-46.
[10] Wiggs G F S, Livingstone I, Thomas D S G,et al.Airflow and roughness characteristics over partially vegetated linear dunes in the southwest Kalahari Desert[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms199621(1):19-34.
[11] Sharratt B, Feng G L.Friction velocity and aerodynamic roughness of conventional and undercutter tillage within the Columbia Plateau,USA[J].Soil and Tillage Research2009105(2):236-241.
[12] 闫鑫苒,张倪斌,宋政梅,等.机械沙障与治沙植物不同配置防风固沙效益研究[J].防护林科技2024(4):1-6.
[13] 王文彪,党晓宏,张吉树,等.库布齐沙漠北缘几种机械沙障对沙丘土壤水分的影响[J].北方园艺2011(24):182-185.
[14] 袁方,张振师,卜崇峰,等.毛乌素沙地光伏电站项目区风速流场及风蚀防治措施[J].中国沙漠201636(2):287-294.
[15] 李红悦,哈斯额尔敦.机械沙障固沙效应及生态效应的研究综述[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)202056(1):63-67.
[16] 闫德仁,袁立敏,黄海广,等.直压立式纱网沙障对近地表输沙量及风速的影响[J].中国沙漠202040(2):79-85.
[17] 陈曦,高永,娜仁格日勒,等.风场及光伏电场配置对阵列风沙结构影响的模拟分析[J].北京林业大学学报201739(8):68-76.
[18] 石涛,蒙仲举,崔向新,等.库布齐沙漠光伏电站内芦苇沙障的防风固沙效益[J].水土保持通报202040(5):166-171.
[19] 陈曦,高永,翟波,等.沙区光伏电场的风沙流输移特征[J].干旱区研究201936(3):684-690.
[20] 李锦荣,蒙仲举,高永,等.低立式格状土工沙障固沙效果研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版)200930(1):81-86.
[21] 闫德仁,黄海广,闫婷.纱网沙障研究进展[J].内蒙古林业科技202450(3):50-53.
[22] 王茂林,宋玲,刘杰,等.双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益[J].水土保持学报202438(1):368-377.
[23] 孔庆波,纳守贵,贺金明,等.南疆沙漠地区草方格沙障施工技术与应用评价[J].山东交通科技2021(2):116-117.
[24] 柳军,肖玉濮,于曙华,等.草方格沙障高度与间距对防沙固沙效果的影响研究[J].西部交通科技2021(11):203-205.
[25] 崔健.立式PLA沙障防护效果及数值模拟研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2022.
[26] 朱泊年,党晓宏,蒙仲举,等.乌珠穆沁沙地生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙障防风固沙效益[J].水土保持研究202330(2):431-437.
[27] 王文舒,甘晓雪,张斌武,等.不同材料沙障的防风固沙效果与成本效益分析[J].北京农学院学报202540(1):5-12.
Outlines

/