基于AHP-PROMETHEE-GIS的半干旱地区生态旅游活动适宜性分析——以宁夏灵武市白芨滩沙漠公园为例
|
陈思淇, 张玉钧, 高云, 肖书文, 张娇娇
|
Suitability analysis of ecotourism activities in semi-arid areas based on AHP-PROMETHEE-GIS:A case study of Baijitan Desert Park in Lingwu City, Ningxia, China
|
Siqi Chen, Yujun Zhang, Yun Gao, Shuwen Xiao, Jiaojiao Zhang
|
|
表7 不同生态旅游活动下的指标权重赋值
|
Table 7 Assignment of indicator weights under different eco-tourism activities
|
|
活动 | 指标 |
---|
土壤沙化类型 | 坡度 | 野生动物活动分布距离 | 水体 距离 | 土地利用现状 | 主要道路距离 | 服务设施距离 | 植被覆盖度 | 特色植被分布 | 监测设施距离 | 合计 |
---|
A1 | 森林游赏 | 0.0739 | 0.0298 | 0.0642 | 0.047 | 0.0881 | 0.0809 | 0.1273 | 0.3282 | 0.1094 | 0.0513 | 1 | A2 | 生态科普 | 0.0875 | 0.0353 | 0.2618 | 0.0556 | 0.0536 | 0.0276 | 0.0482 | 0.061 | 0.244 | 0.1254 | 1 | A3 | 专业考察 | 0.0727 | 0.0182 | 0.3978 | 0.0363 | 0.0544 | 0.0208 | 0.0208 | 0.0334 | 0.2003 | 0.1454 | 1 | A4 | 田园休闲 | 0.0989 | 0.0494 | 0.0698 | 0.0247 | 0.2062 | 0.0491 | 0.0924 | 0.3266 | 0.0653 | 0.0174 | 1 | A5 | 野外露营 | 0.1141 | 0.1141 | 0.0464 | 0.038 | 0.0727 | 0.1509 | 0.2669 | 0.1395 | 0.0232 | 0.0341 | 1 | A6 | 户外徒步 | 0.1741 | 0.0745 | 0.1207 | 0.0471 | 0.105 | 0.029 | 0.1159 | 0.1379 | 0.1379 | 0.058 | 1 | A7 | 沙漠越野 | 0.2867 | 0.1337 | 0.0492 | 0.0369 | 0.2108 | 0.0668 | 0.1049 | 0.0313 | 0.0626 | 0.0171 | 1 | A8 | 沙雕挖沙 | 0.3294 | 0.0911 | 0.0483 | 0.0501 | 0.1638 | 0.0663 | 0.1421 | 0.0302 | 0.0604 | 0.0183 | 1 | A9 | 滑沙游乐 | 0.3741 | 0.1602 | 0.0639 | 0.034 | 0.1697 | 0.0186 | 0.0742 | 0.0341 | 0.0341 | 0.0371 | 1 | A10 | 探险拓展 | 0.2296 | 0.132 | 0.0694 | 0.0505 | 0.154 | 0.0287 | 0.0652 | 0.1637 | 0.0819 | 0.0251 | 1 | A11 | 滨水休闲 | 0.0396 | 0.0237 | 0.0395 | 0.1945 | 0.5031 | 0.0711 | 0.0326 | 0.0424 | 0.0424 | 0.0111 | 1 |
|
|
|