荒漠区粗糙度长度的确定及在模式中的应用

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00025

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2005年进行的“绿洲系统能量与水分循环补充观测试验”第3阶段的观测资料计算了金塔试验区内戈壁和沙漠的动力学和热力学粗糙度长度，沙漠和戈壁的动力粗糙度长度分别为1.81×10-3m和1.64×10-3 m，与黑河试验结果基本一致，均为沙漠的动力粗糙度大于戈壁。试验区内沙漠和戈壁的热力粗糙度长度分别是0.28×10-3 m和0.62×10-3 m。将计算得到的粗糙度长度代入Noah陆面模式，模拟的戈壁、沙漠上的地表温度和感热通量同观测值较为一致，优于原粗糙度长度的模拟结果，大大提高了该模式在沙漠、戈壁特殊区域的模拟能力，有利于将耦合了Noah模式的中尺度模式更好地应用到绿洲系统的研究中。

关键词: 粗糙度长度, 地表温度, 感热通量, 荒漠地表

Abstract:

Using the data from the third phase of "The Oasis System Energy and Water Cycle Field Experiment" in 2005, we calculated the aerodynamic and thermal roughness lengths of desert surface in Jinta Oasis area. The aerodynamic roughness lengths of sandy desert and gobi in Jinta Oasis area were 1.81×10-3 m and 1.64×10-3 m respectively, and they were similar to the calculation results from the HEIFE experiment in Heihe River basin: the aerodynamic roughness length of sandy desert was bigger than that of Gobi. The thermal roughness lengths of sandy desert and gobi in Jinta Oasis area were 0.28×10-3m and 0.62×10-3 m, respectively. When the roughness length data were replaced into the Noah land surface process model coupled in MM5 and WRF models, the simulation results of surface temperature and sensible heat flux in sandy desert and gobi were quite consistent with the observation results. The simulation capability of surface temperature and sensible heat flux in desert area could be improved a lot using the aerodynamic and thermal roughness length data. This would be favorable to the application of the Noah model to the oasis system study.

Key words: roughness length, land surface temperature, sensible heat flux, desert surface

中图分类号:

P404

陈世强，吕世华. 荒漠区粗糙度长度的确定及在模式中的应用[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(1): 174-178.

CHEN Shi-qiang, LV Shi-hua. Calculation of Roughness Length of Desert and Its Application in Land Surface Process Model[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(1): 174-178.

参考文献

[1]王涛.我国绿洲化及其研究的若干问题初探[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):995-998.

[2]李金香,塔西普拉提·特依拜,雷磊,等.干旱区典型绿洲热场分布规律研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):992-1000.

[3]雷磊,塔西普拉提·特依拜,李金香,等.干旱区典型绿洲地表温度与植被覆盖度相关性研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):1001-1007.

[4]李万莉,吕世华,杨胜鹏,等.金塔绿洲主要特征量的数值模拟[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1207-1214.

[5]李国平,段廷杨,巩远发.青藏高原西部地区的总体输送系数和地面通量[J].科学通报,2000,45(8):865-869.

[6]李国平,赵邦杰,卢敬华.青藏高原总体输送系数的特征[J].气象学报,2002,60(1):60-67.

[7]Driese K L,Reiners W A.Aerodynamic roughness parameters for semi-arid natural shrub communities of Wyoming,USA[J].Agricultural and Forest Meterology,1997,88:1-14.

[8]Chen F,Janjic Z,Mitchell K E.Impact of atmospheric surface layer parameterizations in the new land surface scheme of the NCEP mesoscale ETA model[J].Boundary Layer Meteorology,1997,85:391-421.

[9]左洪超,胡隐樵.黑河试验区沙漠和戈壁的总体输送系数[J].高原气象,1992,11(4):371-380.

[10]Gao Z,Wang J,Ma Y,et al.Study of roughness lengths and drag coefficients over Nansha Sea region,gobi,desert,oasis and Tibetan Plateau[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth-Part B,2000,25(2):141-145.

[11]贾立,王介民.绿洲-沙漠复合地表条件下的局地和有效粗糙度[J].气象学报,1999,57(3):346-357.

[12]贾立,王介民,胡泽勇.干旱区热力学粗糙度特征及对感热通量估算的影响[J].高原气象,2000,19(4):495-503.

[13]于涛.绿洲沙漠系统地表辐射收支的模拟研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):686-690.

[14]Stull R B.边界层气象学导论[M].杨长新译.北京:气象出版社,1991:100-150.

[15]Chen F,Dudhia J.Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part 1:Model implementation and sensitivity[J].Monthly Weather Review,2001,129:569-585.

[16]Zilitinkevich S S.Non-local turbulent transport:Pollution dispersion aspects of coherent structure of convective flows[M]//Power H,Moussiopoulos N,Brebbia C A.Air Pollution Theory and Simulation.Boston:Computational Mechanics Publications,1995:53-60.