陕西省丹凤县茶房村黄土古土壤剖面风化程度及对气候变化的响应

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00363

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对陕西丹凤县茶房村黄土剖面的地层学、沉积学特征以及常量元素、磁化率、粒度等进行了研究。结果表明：茶房村剖面具有表土（MS）→全新世黄土（L₀）→古土壤（S₀）→过渡黄土（L_t）→马兰黄土（L₁）的地层序列；化学风化过程中元素Ca、Na、Mg、K和Si表现为迁移特征，Fe则相对富集，呈现Na>Si>Mg>K>Ca>Al>Fe的迁移序列；剖面总体风化程度处于初等向中等过渡的阶段，不同地层的风化强弱顺序为S₀>L_t>L₁>L₀。化学风化强度的变化表明该区自晚更新世以来气候经历了气候干冷→气候回暖→温暖湿润→气候转凉的变化过程。

关键词: 黄土-古土壤, 风化程度, 古气候, 茶房村

Abstract: The Chafangcun profile in Danfeng, Shaanxi, China were surveyed in detail and then sampled systematically. The stratigraphic and sediment logical characteristics, chemical weathering intensity and the profile structure were observed in the field. Magnetic susceptibility, particle-size distribution, geochemical characteristics were analyzed in laboratory. Results are shown as follows: (1)The stratigraphic sequences of Chafangcun profile changed with the stratigraphic series MS-L₀-S₀-L_t-L₁. (2) The major elements such as Ca, Na, Mg, K and Si were migrated and leached, while the element Fe was slightly enriched during the chemical weathering process. According to the migration ability, the major elements were ranked in the following order: Na>Si>Mg>K>Ca>Al>Fe. (3) The Chafangcun loess have finished the primary chemical weathering process and almost reached the secondary process as a whole. The aeolian sediments went through different degree of pedogenic modification in different periods with the sequence S₀>L_t>L₁>L₀. Geochemical characteristics of major elements indicate that the climate changed as "cool-dry (before 11500 a BP)→cool-wet(11 500~8 500 a BP)→warm-wet (8 500-3 100 a BP)→cool-dry (since 3100 a BP)".

Key words: loess-paleosol, weathering intensity, paleoclimate, Chafangcun

中图分类号:

P532

高鹏坤, 庞奖励, 黄春长, 周亚利, 王蕾彬, 王学佳. 陕西省丹凤县茶房村黄土古土壤剖面风化程度及对气候变化的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(5): 1248-1253.

Gao Pengkun, Pang Jiangli, Huang Chunchang, Zhou Yali, Wang Leibin, Wang Xuejia. Weathering Intensity of the Chafangcun Loess-paleosol Profile in Shaanxi, China and Its Response to Climate Change[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(5): 1248-1253.

参考文献

[1] 陈骏,季峻峰,仇纲,等.陕西洛川黄土化学风化程度的地球化学研究[J].中国科学(D辑),1997,27(6):531-536.
[2] 庞奖励,黄春长,周亚利,等.汉江上游谷地全新世风成黄土及其成壤改造特征[J].地理学报,2011,66(11):1562-1573.
[3] 牛晓露,庞奖励,黄春长,等.陕西周原地区全新世黄土-古土壤序列风化程度研究[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(2):306-312.
[4] Yang S L,Ding F,Ding Z L.Pleistocene chemical weathering history of Asian arid and semi-arid regions recorded in loess deposits of China and Tajikistan[J]. Geochemica et Cosmochimica acta,2006,70(7):1695-1709.
[5] 杨红瑾,黄春长,庞奖励,等.宁夏长城塬全新世黄土-土壤剖面元素地球化学特征研究[J].地理科学,2010,30(1):134-140.
[6] Dong G H,Xia Z K,Elston R et al. Response of geochemical records in lacustrine sediments to climate change and human impact during middle Holocene in Mengjin,Henan Province,China[J].Frontiers of Earth Science in China,2009,3(3):279-285.
[7] 李拓宇,莫多闻,朱高儒,等.晋南全新世黄土剖面常量元素地球化学特征及其古环境意义[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1411-1420.
[8] 毛沛妮,庞奖励,黄春长,等.汉江上游谷地归仙河口剖面风化成壤特征及其记录的气候变化事件[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(6):1678-1691.
[9] 郭媛媛,莫多闻,毛龙江,郭伟民,顾海滨.澧阳平原岩板垱剖面地球化学特征与风化强度研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(3):335-341.
[10] 卢越,查小春,黄春长,等.汉江上游郧县段黄土-古土壤序列风化成壤特征以及成壤环境演变[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(4).doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00277.
[11] Liu Z F,Colin C,Huang W et al.Climatic and tectonic controls on weathering in south China and Indochina Peninsula:clay mineralogical and geochemical investigations from the Pearl,Red,and Mekong drainage basins[J].Geochemistry,Geophysics,Geosystems,2007,8(5):Q05005.
[12] 王丽娟,庞奖励,黄春长,等.甜水沟全新世黄土-古土壤序列风化程度及意义[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(3):379-384.
[13] 雷祥义.秦岭黄土的粒度分析及其成因初步探讨[J].地质学报,1998,72(2):178-188.
[14] 雷祥义.秦岭黄土-古土壤发育时的植被与环境[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2000,20(1):73-79.
[15] 雷祥义.商州黄土记录的最近六十万年来东秦岭古环境变迁[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1999,19(1):69-79.
[16] 齐矗华.丹江上游河谷地貌的演变及其发展趋势[J].陕西师大学报(自然科学版),1984,(1):80-92.
[17] Huang Chunchang,JiaYaofeng,Pang Jiangli,et al.Holocene colluviation and its implications for tracing human-induce soil erosion and redeposition on the pied-mont loess lands of the Qinling Mountains,Northern China[J].Geoderma,2006,136(3):838-851.
[18] 贾耀锋,庞奖励.关中盆地东部全新世剖面粒度组成与气候变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):41-43.
[19] 鹿化煜,安芷生.黄土高原黄土粒度组成的古气候意义[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),1998,28(3):278-283.
[20] 刘秀铭,刘东生,Friedrich Heller,等.中国黄土磁化率与第四纪古气候研究[J].地质科学,1992,S1:279-285.
[21] 柏道远,李长安,陈渡平,等.化学风化指数和磁化率对洞庭盆地第四纪古气候变化的响应[J].中国地质,2011,38(3):779-785.
[22] 李志文,李保生,孙丽,等.影响中国黄土磁化率差异的多因素评述[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(2):231-237.
[23] 杨守业,李从先,李徐生等.长江下游下蜀黄土化学风化的地球化学研究.地球化学,2001,30(4):402-406.
[24] McLennan S M.Weathering and global denudation[J].Journal of Geology,1993,101:295-303.
[25] Nesbitt H W,Young G M.Early Proterozoic climate and platemotions inferred from major element chemistry of lutite [J].Nature,1982,299:715-717.
[26] 丁敏,庞奖励,黄春长,等.关中东部全新世黄土古土壤序列常量元素地球化学特性研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):862-867.
[27] 李徐生,韩志勇,杨守业,等.镇江下蜀土剖面的化学风化强度与元素迁移特征[J].地理学报,2007,62(11):1174-1184.
[28] 张玉芬,李长安,熊德强,等.“巫山黄土”氧化物地球化学特征与古气候记录[J].中国地质,2013,40(1):352-360.
[29] 鲜锋,周卫健,余华贵.全新世气候系统的突变及周期性[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2006,26(5):109-115.