京津风沙源区1959-2011年潜在蒸散气候敏感性的时空变异

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00122

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于Penman-Monteith公式和京津风沙源区及周边46个气象站1959-2011年逐日气象数据,分析了潜在蒸散对气温、风速、日照时数和相对湿度的敏感性及其时空变化规律。结果表明:(1)年尺度潜在蒸散对最高气温最为敏感,其次是相对湿度,对风速最不敏感;季节尺度最高气温和日照时数敏感系数的高值发生在夏季,最低气温、风速和相对湿度敏感系数的高值发生在冬季。(2)空间尺度潜在蒸散对最高气温、最低气温和相对湿度的敏感性表现为从东北向西南减少,而对日照时数表现为增加。(3)京津风沙源区1959-2011年潜在蒸散对气温的敏感性呈下降趋势,而对风速、日照时数和相对湿度的敏感性呈增加趋势。(4)气温的敏感性随温度升高而下降,而日照时数和相对湿度的敏感性随光照和湿度下降而升高。

关键词: 潜在蒸散, Penman-Monteith公式, 敏感系数, 时空变化, 京津风沙源区

Abstract:

In this paper, based on daily data at 46 meteorological stations within and around the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Zone during 1959-2011, the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to variation of air temperature, wind speed, sunshine duration and relative humidity at different timescales was identified by using the Penman-Monteith equation and non-dimensional sensitivity coefficient. (1)Annual potential evapotranspiration was most sensitive to maximum air temperature, followed by relative humidity, wind speed was the least sensitive variable; In terms of season, the high values of sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to maximum air temperature and sunshine hours occurred in summer, and the high values of sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to minimum air temperature, wind speed and relative humidity occurred in winter. (2) The sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to maximum air temperature, minimum air temperature and relative humidity showed decreasing trend from northeast to southwest, while the sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to sunshine hours showed increasing trend from northeast to southwest. (3) During 1959-2011, the sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to maximum air temperature and minimum air temperature showed decreasing trends, while the sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to wind speed, sunshine hours and relative humidity showed increasing trend. (4) The sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to maximum air temperature and minimum air temperature decreased with increase of the maximum air temperature and minimum air temperature, while the sensitive coefficients of potential evapotranspiration to sunshine hours and relative humidity increased with decrease of the sunshine duration and relative humidity.

Key words: potential evapotranspiration, Penman-Monteith equation, sensitivity coefficient, temporal-spatial change, Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Zone

中图分类号:

单楠, 杨晓晖, 时忠杰, 赵西素. 京津风沙源区1959-2011年潜在蒸散气候敏感性的时空变异[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015, 35(5): 1330-1337.

Shan Nan, Yang Xiaohui, Shi Zhongjie, Zhao Xisu. Temporal-spatial Change of the Sensitivity of Potential Evapotranspiration to Climatic Influencing Factors in Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Zone[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(5): 1330-1337.

参考文献

[1] 闫人华,熊黑钢,张芳.夏秋季绿洲荒漠过渡带芨芨草地蒸散及能量平衡特征研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(1):133-145.
[2] 马宁,王乃昂,王鹏龙,等.黑河流域参考蒸散量的时空变化特征及影响因素的定量分析[J].应用生态学报,2012,27(6):975-989.
[3] 刘昌明,张丹.中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):579-588.
[4] Gong L B,Xu C Y,Chen D L,et al.Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtz River) basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2006,329(3/4):620-629.
[5] 梁丽乔,李丽娟,李九一,等.松嫩平原西部生长季参考作物蒸散发的敏感性分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(5):1-5.
[6] 刘小莽,郑红星,刘昌明,等.海河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1470-1476.
[7] 李斌,李丽娟,覃驭楚,等.澜沧江流域潜在蒸散发敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2011,33(7):1256-1263.
[8] Goyal R K.Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming:a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan(India)[J].Agriculture Water Management,2004,69:1-11.
[9] Zuo D P,Xu Z X,Yang H,et al.Spatiotemporal variations and abrupt changes of potential evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Wei River basin,China[J].Hydrological processes,2012,26:1149-1160.
[10] 刘宪锋,潘耀忠,张锦水,等.1960-2011年西北五省潜在蒸散的时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(9):2564-2570.
[11] 王炳亮,李国胜.辽河三角洲不同干湿气候区参考蒸散发敏感因子时空变化[J].地理科学,2013,33(8):993-998.
[12] 李明志,张学培.实施京津风沙源治理工程的问题及对策[J].北京林业大学学报,2004,3(3):76-79.
[13] Shi Z J,Yang X H,Guo H,et al.Benfits of sandstorm control in China[J].The Forestry Chronicle,2014,90(2):132-135.
[14] 京津风沙源治理工程二期规划思路研究项目组.京津风沙源治理工程二期规划思路研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2013.
[15] 尹云鹤,吴绍洪,赵东升,等.1980-2010年气候变化对青藏高原实际蒸散的影响[J].地理学报,2012,67(11):1471-1481.
[16] McVicar T R,Van Niel T G,Li L T,et al.Spatially distributing monthly reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation considering topographic influences[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,338(3/4):196-220.
[17] 左德鹏,徐宗学,程磊,等.渭河流域潜在蒸散量时空变化及其突变特征[J].资源科学,2011,33(5):975-982.
[18] Allen R G,Jensen M E,Wright J L,et al.Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements[M].Rome,Italy:United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization,1998.
[19] Mc Cuen R H.A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evaporation[J].Water Resource Bulletin,1974,10(3):486-498.
[20] Coleman G,De Coursey D G.Sensitivity and model variance analysis applied to some evaporation and evapotranspiration model [J].Water Resource Research,1976,12(5):873-879.
[21] Yin Y H,Wu S H,Chen G.Attribution analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes in China since the 1960s[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2010,101:19-28.
[22] Sen P K.Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1968,63:1379-1389.
[23] Kendall M G,Gibbons J D.Rank Correlation Methods[M].London,UK:Edward Arnold,1981.
[24] Libiseller C.A Program for the Computation of Multivariate and Partial Mann-Kendall Test[M].Stockholm,Sweden:University of Linkoping,2002.