不同生境半日花(Helianthemum songaricum)植物构型特征

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

荒漠植物构型是植物与环境相互作用、相互适应的结果,其与功能的相互作用决定了荒漠植被的发展与演替。系统研究了半日花(Helianthemum songaricum)的分枝率、分枝角度、分枝长度和枝茎比等构型特征,对比研究了不同土壤类型和不同坡位间、半日花的构型特征响应及其适应机理。结果表明:覆沙地半日花的总体分枝率为0.49±0.03,石砾地半日花总体分枝率0.56±0.03;逐步分枝率SBR_2:3和SBR_3:4呈现覆沙地半日花大于石砾地半日花,SBR_1:2则表现相反;半日花1~4级分枝角度集中在30°~42°,并且1级到4级呈增大趋势;覆沙地的枝茎比RBD_2:1、RBD_3:2、RBD_4:3分别为0.57±0.05、0.59±0.05、0.51±0.05,石砾地分别为0.68±0.06、0.72±0.06、0.50±0.03,其中枝茎比RBD_2:1、RBD_3:2、RBD_4:3都呈现先增大后减小趋势;覆沙地半日花的1~3级枝长均大于石砾地半日花,4级枝长小于石砾地半日花,且覆沙地和石砾地半日花的1~4级分枝长度呈依次减小的趋势;同一土壤条件下,不同坡位半日花的枝系构型特征不存在显著性差异。覆沙地半日花枝系长度、粗度、以及枝条数均大于石砾地半日花,能够获得更多空间资源,在植物竞争和演替过程中,其构型特征具有一定的优势。

关键词: 半日花(Helianthemumsongaricum), 土壤类型, 坡位, 构型

Abstract:

Architecture characteristics of desert plants are final product of plant-environment interaction and mutual adaption, and the interaction and feedback among them would determine the development and succession of desert plant. In order to understand architecture characteristics and adaptation mechanism of Helianthemum songaricum in different soil types and different slope positions, the architecture characteristics including the bifurcation ratio, the branch angle, the branch length, and the ratio of branch diameter of H.songaricum were studied. The results showed that, the over bifurcation ratio of H.songaricum in sandy soil was 0.49±0.03, lower than that of 0.56±0.03 in rocky soil; The stepwise bifurcation ratios of SBR_2:3 and SBR_3:4 of H.songaricum in sandy soil were less than those in rocky soil, while that of SBR_1:2 greater for H.songaricum in sandy soil relative to rocky soil; The branch angles of H.songaricum mainly ranged from 30° and 42°, and tended to increase from the first class to the fourth class. The ratio of branch diameter RBD_2:1, RBD_3:2 and RBD_4:3 of H.songaricum, increased first and then decreased with the value of 0.57±0.05, 0.59±0.05 and 0.51±0.05 under sandy soil respectively,and 0.68±0.06, 0.72±0.06, 0.50±0.03 under rocky soil. The branch length of H.songaricum ranged from the first class to the third class in sandy soil was greater than that in rocky soil, while the fourth class branch length was less in sandy soil than in rocky soil. And from the first class to the fourth class, the branch length decreased gradually in both soil types. In conclusion, the numbers, length and stem size of H. songaricum branch were greater in sandy soil than in rocky soil, so H. songaricum individual in sandy soil can obtain more resource due to advantage of architecture characteristics in the process of vegetation competition and succession.

Key words: Helianthemum songaricum, soil types, slope positions, architecture

中图分类号:

Q944.3

王林龙, 刘明虎, 李清河, 徐军. 不同生境半日花(Helianthemum songaricum)植物构型特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(3): 651-658.

Wang Linlong, Liu Minghu, Li Qinghe, Xu Jun. Architecture Characteristics of Helianthemum songaricum under Different Habitats[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(3): 651-658.

参考文献

[1] Hallé F.Architectural varitation at the specific level in tropical trees[M]//Tomlinson P B,Zimmermann M H.Tropical Trees as Living Systems.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1978:209-221.
[2] Hallé F,Oldeman R A A,Tomlinson P B.Tropical trees and forests:an architectural analysis[M].New York,USA:Springer-Verlag,1978.
[3] Oldeman R A A.Forests:Elements of Silvology[M].Berlin,Germany:Springer-Verlag,1990.
[4] Comas L H,Eissenstat D M.Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species[J].Functional Ecology,2004,18(3):388-397.
[5] Classen-Bockhoff R.Inflorescences in Bruniaceae:with general comments on inflorescences in woody plants[J].Opera Botanica Belgica,2000,12:310.
[6] Grosfeld J,Barthélémy D,Brion C.Architectural variations of Araucaria araucana (Molina) K.Koch (Araucariaceae) in its natural habitat[M]//Kurmam M H,Hemsley A R.The Evolution of Plant Architecture.Kew,UK:Royal Botanic Gardens,1999:109-122.
[7] Ishii H,Asano S.The role of crown architecture,leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests[J].Ecological Research,2010,25(4):715-722.
[8] Millet J,Bouchard A,Edelin C.Relationship between architecture and successional status of trees in the temperate deciduous forest[J].Ecoscience,1999,6(2):187-203.
[9] Stecconi M,Puntieri J,Barthélémy D.Annual shoot-growth in Nothofagus antarctica (G.Forster) Oersted (Nothofagaceae) from northern Patagonia[J].Trees,2000,14(5):289-296.
[10] Wang Z,Guo D,Wang X,et al.Fine root architecture,morphology,and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species[J].Plant and Soil,2006,288(1/2):155-171.
[11] Angevine M W,Handel S N.Invasion of forest floor space,clonal architecture,and population growth in the perennial herb Clintonia borealis[J].The Journal of Ecology,1986,74(2):547-560.
[12] Boucher F C,Thuiller W,Arnoldi C,et al.Unravelling the architecture of functional variability in wild populations of Polygonum viviparum L[J].Functional Ecology,2013,27(2):382-391.
[13] Martina J P,von Ende C N.Increased spatial dominance in high nitrogen,saturated soil due to clonal architecture plasticity of the invasive wetland plant,Phalaris arundinacea[J].Plant Ecology,2013,214(12):1443-1453.
[14] Rua G H,Grottola M C.Growth form models within the genus Paspalum L.(Poaceae,Paniceae)[J].Flora,1997,192(1):65-80.
[15] Caballé G.Leéport autoportant des lianes tropicales:une synth-èse des strat gies de croissance[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1998,76(10):1703-1716.
[16] Gómez-Aparicio L,Zamora R,Góméz J M,et al.Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration:a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants[J].Ecological Applications,2004,14(4):1128-1138.
[17] Hatley C L,Macmahon J A.Spider community organization:seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture[J].Environmental Entomology,1980,9(5):632-639.
[18] Valladares F,Pearcy R W.The functional ecology of shoot architecture in sun and shade plants of Heteromeles arbutifolia M.Roem.,a Californian chaparral shrub[J].Oecologia,1998,114(1):1-10.
[19] Valladares F,Wright S J,Lasso E,et al.Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest[J].Ecology,2000,81(7):1925-1936.
[20] 何明珠,王辉,张景光.民勤荒漠植物枝系构型的分类研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(9):1827-1832.
[21] 何明珠,张景光,王辉.荒漠植物枝系构型影响因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):625-630.
[22] 孙栋元,赵成义,王丽娟,等.荒漠植物构型研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):281-287.
[23] 李尝君,郭京衡,曾凡江,等.多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)根、冠构型的年龄差异及其适应意义[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):365-372.
[24] Chen J M,Black T A.Measuring leaf area index of plant canopies with branch architecture[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1991,57(1):1-12.
[25] Lynch J.Root architecture and plant productivity[J].Plant Physiology,1995,109(1):7.
[26] López-Bucio J,Cruz-Ramírez A,Herrera-Estrella L.The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2003,6(3):280-287.
[27] Svistoonoff S,Creff A,Reymond M,et al.Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture[J].Nature Genetics,2007,39(6):792-796.
[28] Vollbrecht E,Springer P S,Goh L,et al.Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses[J].Nature,2005,436(7054):1119-1126.
[29] Zhang H,Forde B G.An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture[J].Science,1998,279(5349):407-409.
[30] Boojh R,Ramakrishnan P S.Growth strategy of trees related to successional status I.architecture and extension growth[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1982,4(4):359-374.
[31] Ellison A M,Niklas K J.Branching patterns of Salicornia europaea (Chenopodiaceae) at different successional stages:a comparison of theoretical and real plants[J].American Journal of Botany,1988,75(4):501-512.
[32] Küppers M.Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants:a question of cost-benefit relationships[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1989,4(12):375-379.
[33] Borchert R,Slade N A.Bifurcation ratios and the adaptive geometry of trees[J].Botanical Gazette,1981,142(3):394-401.
[34] Bicknell S H.Development of canopy stratification during early succession in northern hardwoods[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1982,4(1):41-51.
[35] Bell A D.Dynamic Morphology:A contribution to plant population ecology[M]//Dirzo R,Sarukhán J.Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology,1984:31-47.
[36] 吴征镒.中国植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.
[37] 陈育,杨劼,张璞进,等.西鄂尔多斯半日花(Helianthemum soongoricum)种群结构和点格局分析[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(1):75-82.
[38] Honda H,Fisher J B.Tree branch angle:maximizing effective leaf area[J].Science,1978,199(4331):888-890.
[39] Horn H S.The Adaptive Geometry of Trees[M].Princeton,USA:Princeton University Press,1971.
[40] Horn H S.The ecology of secondary succession[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1974,5:25-37.
[41] Cannell M G R,Last F T.Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement[M].London,UK:Academic Press,1976.
[42] Duursma R A,Mäkelä A.Summary models for light interception and light-use efficiency of non-homogeneous canopies[J].Tree Physiology,2007,27(6):859-870.
[43] Jarvis P G,Leverenz J W.Productivity of Temperate,Deciduous and Evergreen Forests[M].Berlin,Germany:Springer,1983:233-280.
[44] Lagergren F,Eklundh L,Grelle A,et al.Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2005,28(3):412-423.
[45] Cescatti A,Niinemets.Leaf to Landscape[M].New York,USA:Springer,2004:42-85.
[46] Kawamura K.A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts[J].Ecological Research,2010,25(4):733-744.
[47] Niinemets U.Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2007,30(9):1052-1071.
[48] Pearcy R W,Sims D A.Photosynthetic acclimation to changing light environments:scaling from the leaf to the whole plant[J].Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants,1994:145-174.
[49] Valladares F,Niinemets U.The Architecture of Plant Crowns:From design rules to light capture and performance[M]//Valladares F,Niinemets U.Functional Plant Ecology,2007:101-149.
[50] 王丽娟,孙栋元,赵成义,等.准噶尔盆地梭梭,白梭梭植物构型特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(17):4952-4960.