潜水埋深对疏叶骆驼刺（Alhagi sparsifoli）幼苗生长和叶片形态的影响

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00331

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了潜水埋深（40、80、120、180、220 cm）处理对一年生疏叶骆驼刺（Alhagi sparsifoli）幼苗生长和叶片形态的影响。结果表明：随着潜水埋深的增加，疏叶骆驼刺幼苗叶片厚度逐渐增加，叶片厚度在220 cm埋深下最大，长度和宽度在120 cm埋深下最大，且叶片长度呈优先减小的趋势；潜水埋深变化对疏叶骆驼刺株高生长影响不大，但对冠幅和分枝数的生长影响显著（p<0.05）；除40 cm埋深处理中根系以平均1.24 cm·d^-1的速率扎入地下水层外，其他4个处理根系生长速率随潜水埋深的增加而增加，且180 cm和220 cm埋深下根系生长速率明显高于其他3个处理；根系到达220 cm潜水埋深的时间为123 d；幼苗生物量积累随着潜水埋深变化先增加后减小，茎叶生物量在 120 cm埋深处理中达到最大值，而根系生物量在180 cm埋深下最大。潜水埋深变化对疏叶骆驼刺地上部分和根系生长的影响不同，潜水埋深增加有利于根系生长和根系生物量增加；以120 cm为拐点，潜水埋深过浅或过深都会抑制地上部分生长；220 cm潜水埋深条件下，疏叶骆驼刺生长缓慢且生物量的累积最小，表明若潜水埋深大于220 cm则对幼苗生长不利。

关键词: 疏叶骆驼刺（Alhagi sparsifoli）, 叶形态, 根系生长, 生物量分配, 潜水埋深

Abstract: The seedlings of Alhagi sparsifolia were chosen as the experimental materials, and five groundwater table treatments (40, 80, 120, 180 cm and 220 cm) were proceeded to analyze the influences of increasing phreatic water depth on the leaf morphology and growth of Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings. The results are as follows: With the increase of water table depth, the leaf thickness increased gradually and reached the maximum under the treatment of 220 cm. The leaf length and width increased firstly and then decreased, they both reached the maximum under the treatment of 120 cm. Changing water table depth had no significant impact on the height of seedling, but its impacts on the canopy and branch number of seedling were significant (p<0.05). The roots grew and got close to the groundwater with an average rate of 1.24 cm per day under the treatment of 40 cm, and the growing rate of roots under the other treatments increased with increasing ground water depth. The growing rate of roots under the treatments of 180 cm and 220 cm were higher than the other treatments apparently. It took 123 days for the roots to get to the 220 cm water depth. With increase of phreatic water depth, the biomass of seedling increased firstly and then decreased. The maximum biomass of leaf and stem appeared under the treatment of 120 cm, and the maximum biomass of root was under the treatment of 180 cm. The results indicated that the changes of water table depth had different influences on the aboveground part and roots. The increase of ground water table depth helped to increase the length and biomass of roots. The depth of 120 cm could be taken as an crucial point, phreatic water depth deeper or shallower than that point would restrict the growth of the aboveground part. The seedlings had slow growth and the fewest biomasses accumulation under the water depth of 220 cm, suggesting that the groundwater table depth over 220 cm was harmful for the growth of seedling.

Key words: Alhagi sparsifolia, leaf morphology, root growth, biomass allocation, water table depth

中图分类号:

Q948.118

彭守兰, 曾凡江, 王会提, 郭京衡, 高欢欢, 罗维成, 宋聪. 潜水埋深对疏叶骆驼刺（Alhagi sparsifoli）幼苗生长和叶片形态的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(2): 396-404.

Peng Shoulan, Zeng Fanjiang, Wang Huiti, Guo Jingheng, Gao Huanhuan, Luo Weicheng, Song Cong. Effects of Water Table Depth on Leaf Morphology and Growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Seedlings[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(2): 396-404.

参考文献

[1] Cui Y L,Shao J L.The role of ground water in arid/semiarid ecosystems,Northwest China[J].Ground Water,2005,43: 471-477.
[2] Bosabalidis A M,Kodidis G.Comparative effects of drought stress on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars[J].Plant Science,2002,163:375-379.
[3] Wand Y L,Xu Z Z,Zhou G S.Changes in biomass allocation and gas exchange characteristics of Leymus chinensis in response to soil water stress[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2004,28:803-809.
[4] Wu F Z,Bao W K,Li F L,et al.Effects of drought stress and N supply on the growth,biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2008,63:248-255.
[5] 巴比江,郑大玮,卡热玛·哈木提,等.地下水埋深对春玉米田土壤水分及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):57-60.
[6] Kahlown M A,Ashraf M,Ziaul H.Effect of shallow groundwater table on crop water requirements and crop yields[J].Agriculture Water Management,2005,76:24-35.
[7] 朱成刚,李卫红,马建新,等.塔里木河下游水位对柽柳叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21:1689-1696.
[8] 陈亚鹏,陈亚宁,徐长春,等.塔里木河下游地下水埋深对胡杨气体交换和叶绿素荧光的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(2): 344-353.
[9] 张晓蕾,曾凡江,刘波,等.不同地下水埋深下骆驼刺幼苗叶片生理参数光响应特性[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(2):229-235.
[10] Imada S,Yamanaka N,Tamai S.Water table depth affects Populus alba fine root growth and whole plant biomass[J].Functional Ecology,2008,22:1018-1026.
[11] 刘波,曾凡江,郭海峰,等.骆驼刺幼苗生长特性对不同地下水埋深的响应[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(2):237-242.
[12] Schuepp P H.Tansley review No.59 leaf boundary layers[J].New Phytologist,1993,125:477-507.
[13] Lambers H,Chapin F S III,Pons T L.Plant Physiological Ecology[M].New York,USA:Springer-Verlag,2008:1-338.
[14] Vogel S.Leaves in the lowest and highest winds:temperature,force and shape[J].New Phytologist,2009,183:13-26.
[15] Bragg J G,Westoby M.Leaf size and foraging for light in a sclerophyll woodland[J].Founctional Ecology,2002,16:633-639.
[16] Wright I J,Reich P B,Westoby M.Strategy shifts in leaf physiology,structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats[J].Functional Ecology,2001,15:423-434.
[17] Rozendaal D M A,Hurtado V H,Poorter L.Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light:relationships with light demand and adult stature[J].Functional Ecology,2006,20:207-216.
[18] Thomas F M,Arndt S K,Bruelheide H,et al.Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a Central-Asian desert:presentation and first result[J].Journal of Applied Botany,2000,74:212-219.
[19] 曾凡江,张希明,李小明.骆驼刺植被及其资源保护与开发的意义[J].干旱区地理,2002,25(3):286-288.
[20] Yan M.A preliminary study on the indicative significance of some plant communites to the soil and ground water in Xinjiang[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1989,13(1):18-27.
[21] Agzhigitova N I,Allanazarova U,Kapustina L A,et al.Transformation of desert pasture vegetation under effect of anthropogenic pressure[J].Problems of Desert Development,1995,3:62-65.
[22] 郭海峰.骆驼刺幼苗根系生长对不同水分条件的响应[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2008: 17-23.
[23] Thomas F M,Foetzki A,Arndt S K,et al.Water use by perennial plants in the transition zone between river oasis and desert in NW China[J].Basic and Applied Ecology,2006,7:253-267.
[24] Zeng F J,Timothy M B,Landman P A,et al.Water and nutrient dynamics in surface roots and soil are not modified by short-term flooding of phreatophytic plants in a hyperarid desert[J].Plant and Soil,2006,279:129-139.
[25] Balota M,Payne W A,Evett S R,et al.Morphological and physiological traits associated with canopy temperature depression in three closely related wheat lines[J].Crop Science,2008,48:1897-1910.
[26] Picotte J J,Rhode J M,Cruzan M B.Leaf morphological responses to variation in water availability for plants in the Piriqueta caroliniana complex[J].Plant Ecology,2009,200:267-275.
[27] 李永华.白刺叶片性状对人工增水的响应[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2010.
[28] Wright I J,Westoby M,Reich P B.Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span[J].Journal of Ecology,2002,90:534-543.
[29] Reich P B,Walter M B,Ellworth D S.Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen,specific leaf area and leaf life span:a test across biomes and functional groups[J].Oecologia,1998,114:471-482.
[30] 陈静,秦景,贺康宁,等.水分胁迫对银水牛果生长及光合气体交换参数的影响[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(8):1649-1655.
[31] 李海峰,曾凡江,桂东伟,等.不同干扰方式对疏叶骆驼刺形态特征及地上生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1):23-28.
[32] 李磊,李向义,林丽莎,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘玉米对不同荒漠化环境的生理生态响应[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):578-587.
[33] 冯丽,张景光,张志山,等.腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被中油蒿的生长及生物量分配动态[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(6):1132-1139.
[34] 杨青华,高尔明,马新明.干旱与渍涝对砂姜黑土玉米根系干重变化及其分布的影响[J].生态学杂志,2000,19(3):28-31.
[35] Baird K J,Stromberg J C,Maddock T.Linking riparian dynamics and groundwater:an eco-hydrologic approach to modeling groundwater and riparian vegetation[J].Environmental Management,2005,36:551-564.
[36] 单立山,张希明,王有科,等.水分条件对塔里木沙漠公路防护林植物幼苗生长及生物量分配的影响[J].科学通报,2008,53:82-88.
[37] 张晓蕾,曾凡江,刘波,等.塔干沙漠南缘骆驼刺幼苗根系生长和分布对不同灌溉量的响应[J].中国沙漠2011,31(6):1459-1467.
[38] 何玉惠,赵哈林,刘新平,等.科尔沁沙地典型生境下芦苇的生长特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(2):288-292.
[39] 刘国军,张希明,吕朝燕,等.不同供水条件下梭梭幼苗生长动态的研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2): 387-394.
[40] Shipley B,Meziane D.The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation[J].Functional Ecology,2002,16:326-331.
[41] 曾凡江,郭海峰,刘波,等.疏叶骆驼刺幼苗根系生态学特性对水分处理的响应[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(6):852-858.
[42] 张晓蕾,曾凡江,刘波,等.不同土壤水分处理对疏叶骆驼刺幼苗光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J].干旱区研究,2010,27(4):649-655.