img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 1999, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 169-172.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

沙土地夏玉米灌溉方式的试验研究

刘祖贵, 吴海卿, 王广兴   

  1. 水利部农田灌溉研究所, 河南新乡 453003
  • 收稿日期:1998-08-17 修回日期:1998-12-14 出版日期:1999-06-20 发布日期:1999-06-20
  • 作者简介:刘祖贵(1963-),男,农学学士,助理研究员。从事作物灌溉的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家"九五"科技攻关项目96-06-02-03中部分内容

A Study on the Irrigation Way of Summer Corn in Sandy Soil

LIU Zu-gui, WU Hai-qing, WANG Guang-xing   

  1. Farmland Irrigation Research Institute of Water Resources Ministry, Xinxiang 453005, Henan, China
  • Received:1998-08-17 Revised:1998-12-14 Online:1999-06-20 Published:1999-06-20

摘要: 在豫北耕作层保水能力较差的砂壤土地带,围绕节水和增收,开展了夏玉米沟灌、常规畦灌及减少生育期内灌水次数的试验研究,每次畦灌定额控制在630~682.5m3·hm-2,而沟灌条件下平均灌水量仅为442.5m3·hm-2。研究结果表明,反映夏玉米生长速率的株高、叶面积指数等性状均是以抽雄期为界,之前增长迅速;抽雄时植株高度达2.50m左右,之后增长速率明显减慢;而抽雄至灌浆初期,叶面积指数保持在5.40~5.92的最高值,往后急剧地下降。不同灌水处理下生长速率的变化则是随着供水总量的增加呈同步增长趋势。在干旱年份,畦灌夏玉米全生长期耗水4278m3·hm-2,沟灌及减少灌水次数的处理,耗水量分别为3762m3·hm-2和3348m3·hm-2。按生长阶段比较,抽雄~开花期日耗水强度最大,为66.75~76.50m3·hm-2;其次是拔节~抽雄期,平均为65.50m3·hm-2;播种~出苗期间日耗水强度仅为13.35m3·hm-2。不同的灌溉方式与灌水量对夏玉米的穗粒重、千粒重及粒占穗重的百分比都有影响。对于宽行稀植作物采用沟灌方式,灌溉用水量小(平均为442.5m3·hm-2),所供的水能集中于植株的根际附近,棵间蒸发的无效损耗少,穗粒重和千粒重都较高,产量达9616.5 kg·hm-2,比畦灌条件下节省22.8%的灌溉用水,水分生产率提高16.9%。减少夏玉米生长期内的灌水次数,在降低水量消耗的同时,易造成较大幅度的减产(13.7%),因此,在夏玉米生长过程中,遇到偏旱年份,要特别注意防止缺水而引起的水分胁迫。

关键词: 夏玉米, 沙壤土, 沟灌, 畦灌, 水分生产率

Abstract: For saving water and increasing yields an experimental study on furrow irrigation, border irrigation and reducing irrigation times during summer corn's growing period was conducted in the sandy loam region with poor preservation of soil moisture in North Henan. Irrigation water quota under border irrigation was 630~682.5 m3·hm-2, while that under furrow irrigation only averaged 442.5 m3·hm-2. The results show that the growing rate of plant's height and leaf area ind ex of summer corn increase rapidly before the tasselling stage, plant of height reaches about 2.5 m at tasselling time, then the growing rate slows down obviously. The leaf area index remains at the highest value of 5.40~5.92 from the tasselling stage to the initial stage of grain filling, then decreases sharply. Under different irrigation treatments, the plant's height and leaf area index increase with the total application of water. In dry years, water consumption of summer corn in whole growth period under border irrigation was 4 278 m3·hm-2, that under furrow irrigation and i rrigation treatments with water amount reduced was 3 762 m3·hm-2 a nd 3 348 m3·hm-2 respectively. Daily water consumption from the tasselling stage to flowering stage was the biggest, it was 66.75~76.50 m3·hm-2; from jointing stage to tasselling stage that was 65.50 m3·hm-2 and fr om sowing to seedling that was only 13.35 m3·hm-2. Grain weight per e ar, 1 000 grain weight and the ratio of grain weight to ear weight were affected by various irrigation methods and water amount of irrigation. Compared with border irrigation, furrow irrigation which was used for crops sparsely sown in wide rows, has more advantages stat ed as follows:① water use for irrigation being less (442.5 m2·hm-2 in average), ② irrigation water collecting around the root system of plants and i ntrarow evaporation being low, ③ grain weight per ear and 1 000 grain weight being high and yield reaching 9 616.5 kg·hm-2, and ④ it saving irrigation water by 22.8% and raising water productivity by 16.9%. During the growing period of summer corn, a reduced number of irrigation times easily results in a gr eat loss of yield (13.7%). Therefore, precaution must be taken to prevent water stress caused by water shortage in dry years.

Key words: Summer corn, Sandy loam, Furrow irrigation, Border irrigation, Water productivity

中图分类号: