Comparative Analysis on Transaction Cost of Two Ecology Management Policies in Sandy Desertification Areas of China
Received date: 2012-04-20
Revised date: 2012-05-21
Online published: 2012-05-21
本文将交易成本分析引入沙漠化地区生态治理政策分析过程，构建生态治理政策交易成本分析框架，确定交易成本计算方法，估算内蒙古乌审旗退耕还林政策执行期间的交易成本为每年4 931.92元·hm-2。其中，政府直接支付占交易成本的50.06%，农户支付占交易成本的46.86%，政府直接支付是退耕还林机会成本的118.75%。草原休牧政策执行期间的交易成本为每年906.07元·hm-2，政府直接支付占交易成本的12.86%，农户支付占交易成本的80.35%，政府直接支付是草原休牧机会成本的23.30%。退耕还林政策的政府支付与退耕还林的机会成本大致相同，因此该政策执行效果良好，并且实现了退耕还林地区的全面禁牧。草原休牧政策的政府支付达不到休牧机会成本的1/4，牧民利益受到损失，牧民偷牧率达到100%，致使草原休牧流于形式。生态治理政策的交易成本分析，将为不同生态治理政策的比较和绩效评价提供一个新的角度，具有重要意义。
樊胜岳 , 赵丹华 , 兰 健 , 徐 均 . 沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013 , 33(4) : 1211 -1216 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00171
This paper introduces transaction cost to the analysis on ecology management policy in sandy desertification areas, builds transaction cost analysis framework of ecology management policy, and determine the method to calculate the transaction cost. As a result, we estimate that the transaction cost in the project of restoring farmland to forest is about 4 931.92 Yuan·hm-2 every year，with government direct payment accounting for 50.06% and farmers taking 46.86% of the total transaction costs. Government direct payment takes 118.75% of the opportunity cost of restoring farmland to forest. The transaction cost in rest-grazing is 906.06 Yuan·hm-2 every year, with government direct payments accounting for 12.86% and farmers taking 80.35% of the total transaction cost. Government direct payment takes 23.30% of the opportunity cost of rest-grazing. The government direct payment of restoring farmland to forest is roughly the same as the opportunity cost of reusing farmland for other purposes. The figures indicate that the implementation of this policy has good effect, and the purpose of graze-prohibiting is achieved in restoring farmland to forest areas. The government payment for rest-grazing cannot reach 1/4 of the opportunity cost of rest-grazing, and the rate of grazing secretly is 100%, the purpose of rest-grazing cannot be achieved. The transaction cost analysis on ecological policy has great significance because of the new perspective it has provided for the ecology management policies performance evaluation and comparative study.
[1]Costanza R,dArge R,de Groot R,et al.The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[2]刘纪远,岳天祥.中国西部生态系统综合评估[M].北京:气象出版社,2006.
[3]王涛,宋翔,颜长珍,等.近35 a来中国北方土地沙漠化趋势的遥感分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1351-1356.
[4]赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,等.我国西北干旱区的荒漠化过程及其空间分异规律[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):1-8.
[5]中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[6]陈秀山.西部开发重大工程项目区域效应评价[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:447-588
[7]李小云,靳乐山.生态补偿机制:政府与市场的作用[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[8]宋乃平,张凤荣,李保国,等.禁牧政策及其效应解析[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(3):316-323.
[9]周立华,朱艳玲,黄玉邦.禁牧政策对北方农牧交错区草地沙漠化逆转过程影响的定量评价[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):308-313.
[10]吐尔逊·哈斯木,曼尼萨汗·吐尔隼,祖木拉提·伊布拉音,等.导致塔里木河流域土地沙漠化扩展的深层次原因分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1380-1387.
[11]樊胜岳,马永欢,周立华.甘肃民勤绿洲近年来生态治理政策在农户中的响应[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):397-403.
[12]李波,赵海霞,郭卫华,等.退耕还林(草)、封山禁牧对传统农牧业的冲击与对策——以北方农牧交错带的黄埔川流域为例[J].地域研究与开发,2004,23(5):97-101.
[13]马骅,吕永龙,刑颖,等.农户对禁牧政策的行为响应及其影响因素研究——以新疆策勒县为例[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(6):902-908.
[14]王金南,庄国泰.生态补偿机制与政策设计[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[15]延军平.中国西北地区生态环境建设与制度创新[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.
[16]Coase R.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937,16(4):386-405.
[17]Williamson O E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms,Markets,Relational Contracting[M].New York:Free Press,1985.
[18]Soloman B.New directions in emission trading:the potential contribution of new institutional economics[J].Ecological Economics,1999,30:371-387.
[19]Colby B.Transaction costs and efficiency in western water allocation[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1990,72:1184-92.
[20]McCann L,Easter K W.Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River[J].Land Economics,1997,75(3):402-414.
[21]沈满洪.论水权交易与交易成本[J].人民黄河,2004,26(7):19-22.
[22]方福前.公共选择理论——政治的经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[23]孔祥智.中国农家经济审视[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
[24]胡继连.中国农户经济行为研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992.
[25]樊胜岳,马丽梅.基于农户的生态建设政策绩效评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(4):572-579.
[26]董光荣,李长治,金炯,等.关于土壤风蚀风洞实验的若干结果[J].科学通报,1987,32(4):297-301.
[27]董治宝,陈渭南,董光荣,等.关于人为地表结构破损与土壤风蚀关系的定量研究[J].科学通报,1995,40(1):54-57.
[28]郭坚,王涛,韩邦帅,等.近30 a来毛乌素沙地及其周边地区沙漠化动态变化过程研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(6):1017-1021.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
©2018中国沙漠 编辑部
地址: 兰州市天水中路8号 (730000)
电话：0931-8267545
Email：caiedit@lzb.ac.cn;desert@lzb.ac.cn
甘公网安备 62010202000688号