img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索

甘肃瓜州锁阳城南雅丹地貌区起沙风况与输沙势特征

  • 梁晓磊 ,
  • 牛清河 ,
  • 安志山 ,
  • 屈建军 ,
  • 邵亚平 ,
  • 王亮
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 敦煌戈壁荒漠研究站/甘肃省风沙灾害防治工程技术研究中心/中国科学院沙漠与沙漠化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3. 甘肃安西极旱荒漠国家级自然保护区管理局, 甘肃 瓜州 736100
梁晓磊(1986-),男,山西忻州人,博士研究生,主要从事风沙地貌研究。E-mail:liangxl@lzb.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2018-06-11

  修回日期: 2018-08-13

  网络出版日期: 2019-06-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41671012);中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所青-人才成长基金项目(51Y551C01);中国科学院沙漠与沙漠化重点实验室开放基金项目(KLDD-2018-003);中国铁路乌鲁木齐局集团有限公司科技研究开发计划课题(2017J003,2017J002)

Sand-driving Wind Regime and Sand Drift Potential in the Yardang Landform Areas of Southern Suoyang Town,Guazhou,Gansu,China

  • Liang Xiaolei ,
  • Niu Qinghe ,
  • An Zhishan ,
  • Qu Jianjun ,
  • Shao Yaping ,
  • Wang Liang
Expand
  • 1. Dunhuang Gobi and Desert Research Station/Gansu Center for Sand Hazard Reduction and Engineering and Technology/Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Administration of An'xi Extra-arid Desert National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province, Guazhou 736100, Gansu, China

Received date: 2018-06-11

  Revised date: 2018-08-13

  Online published: 2019-06-10

摘要

以2016—2018年定位气象观测数据为依据,分析了甘肃瓜州锁阳城南雅丹地貌区的起沙风况及输沙势变化情况。结果表明:(1)研究区起沙风由两组风向近似相反的风所组成,主风向为NE-E,占全年起沙风的68.86%,次风向为WSW-WNW向,占27.67%;(2)年平均起沙风频率为19.0%,春季和夏季起沙风频率最高,分别占全年的33.57%和34.69%,各季起沙风向分布特征基本一致;(3)研究区风况类型为高风能环境和中等风向变率的钝双峰型风况。输沙势的大小和方向变率具有明显的季节性,春、夏季的总输沙势(DP)和合成输沙势(RDP)较高,夏季和冬季的方向变率RDP/DP值较高,合成输沙方向(RDD)245.45°~253.01°(WSW);(4)研究区雅丹地貌长轴走向与主输沙方向一致,说明风力是其形成的主要动力条件。

本文引用格式

梁晓磊 , 牛清河 , 安志山 , 屈建军 , 邵亚平 , 王亮 . 甘肃瓜州锁阳城南雅丹地貌区起沙风况与输沙势特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019 , 39(3) : 48 -55 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00079

Abstract

Based on the meteorological observation data from 2016 to 2017 and the geomorphic feature of the research area, we analyzed the sand-driving wind regime and sand drift potential in the yardang landform areas in the south of Suoyang. The results indicated that: Sand-driving wind in the research area was composed of two groups of wind that close to the opposite directions. There was a higher accumulated frequency with 68.86% in the NE-E direction, and 27.67% in the WSW-WNW. The frequency of annual sand-driving wind was 19.0%, and the sand-driving wind occurred mainly in the spring and summer, with an occurring frequency of 33.57% and 34.69%, respectively. The direction structure of seasonal sand-driving wind was similar. Fry berger equation was applied to calculate annual and seasonal sand drift potential, and to analyze its seasonal variation. As a whole, the wind regime in the study area was high wind environment, medium variability and blunt bimodal wind condition. Obvious seasonal differences were reflected in the sand drift potential and directional variability, and there was higher resultant sand drift potential (RDP) and drift potential (DP) in spring and summer and higher RDP/DP in summer and winter. The resultant drift direction (RDD) was in the range of 245.45°-253.01° (WSW), which was consistent with the directions of yardang main ridge line. Therefore, aeolian power was the main driving force for the formation of yardang landform. In addition, this paper provided a theoretical reference for elucidating the formation and development process of yardang landform by combining with the features of field landform.

参考文献

[1] 朱震达,吴正,刘恕,等.中国沙漠概论[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.
[2] 朱震达,赵兴梁,凌裕泉,等.治沙工程学[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998.
[3] Edwin D M.世界沙海的研究[M].赵兴梁,译.银川:宁夏人民出版社,1993.
[4] 董治宝,苏志珠,钱广强,等.库姆塔格沙漠风沙地貌[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
[5] Wang X M,Dong Z B,Zhang J W,et al.Wind energy environments and dunefield activity in the Chinese deserts[J].Geomorphology,2005,65:33-48.
[6] 牛清河,屈建军,安志山.甘肃敦煌雅丹地质公园区风蚀气候侵蚀力特征[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(6):1-4.
[7] 牛清河.雅丹地貌形成发育过程研究——以敦煌雅丹国家地质公园为例[D].兰州:中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所,2011:8-11.
[8] Hedin S.Central Asia and Tibet[M].New York,USA:Scribner,1994.
[9] Ward A W,Greeley R.Evolution of the yardangs at Rogers Lake,California[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1984,95(7):829-837.
[10] Breed C S,McCauley J F,Whitney M I,et al.Wind erosion in drylands[M]//Thomas D S G.Arid Zone Geomorphology:Process,Form and Change in Drylands.Chichester,USA:John Wiley,1997.
[11] Goudie A S.Wind erosional landforms:yardangs and pans[M]//Goudie A S,Livingstone I,Stokes S.Aeolian Environments,Sediments and Landforms.Chichester,USA:Wiley,1999.
[12] 牛清河,屈建军,李孝泽,等.雅丹地貌研究评述与展望[J].地球科学进展,2011,26(5):516-524.
[13] Zhang H S,Qiao G H,Wang C M,et al.Sustainable development of agriculture in northwestern ecologically fragile desert oasis-a case study of Guazhou county of Gansu province[J].Agricultural Science & Technology,2010,11(6):175-178.
[14] 程英.瓜州县生态环境脆弱性的动态评价[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2006:12-15.
[15] 黄可光,汤乐中.安西县雅丹地貌初探[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),1986,22(3):43-47.
[16] 屈建军,牛清河,高德祥.敦煌雅丹地貌形成发育过程图谱[M].北京:地质出版社,2014.
[17] 郑惠艳.河西走廊西部生态综合治理研究——以瓜州县为例[J].水利规划与设计,2017,2:9.
[18] 张正偲,董治宝,赵爱国.输沙势计算中的"时距"问题[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(2):177-181.
[19] 张克存,牛清河,安志山,等.敦煌沙漠-绿洲过渡带近地表风沙动力环境[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):8-10.
[20] 吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:1-38.
[21] 郭洪旭,王雪芹,蒋进,等.古尔班通古特沙漠腹地输沙风能及地貌学意义[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(4):580-584.
[22] 王永胜,杨文斌,李永华,等.库姆塔格沙漠东缘荒漠绿洲过渡带风况及输沙势[J].干旱区环境与资源,2015,29(1):141-143.
[23] 李文林,王建民.设计风速中高度换算的探讨[J].电力勘测,1996,45(2):45-46.
[24] Fryberger S G.Dune forms and wind regime[M]//Mckee E D.A Study of Global Sand Seas.Washington D C,USA:USGS Professional Paper,1979:137-169.
[25] 俎瑞平,张克存,屈建军,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠风况特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(2):167-169.
[26] 朱震达.中国沙漠、沙漠化、荒漠化及其治理对策[M].北京:中国环境出版社,1999:48-52.
[27] 牛清河.雅丹地貌侵蚀过程若干问题研究[D].兰州:中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所,2014:7-20.
文章导航

/