img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1070/P
  • ISSN 1000-694X
  • 双月刊 创刊于1981年
高级检索

吉兰泰盐湖风沙防护林体系建立35 a以来防沙效益评估

  • 丁延龙 ,
  • 汪季 ,
  • 胡生荣 ,
  • 高永 ,
  • 孙晓瑞 ,
  • 刘斌 ,
  • 杨黎明 ,
  • 沈桂露
展开
  • 1. 内蒙古农业大学 沙漠治理学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010019;
    2. 内蒙古自治区环境工程评估中心, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010011;
    3. 内蒙古自治区水土保持工作站, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010020;
    4. 内蒙古兰太实业股份有限公司, 内蒙古 阿拉善盟 750336
丁延龙(1990-),男,安徽亳州人,博士研究生,主要从事荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:dingyanlong1990@126.com

收稿日期: 2018-07-03

  修回日期: 2018-10-07

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-29

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501003)

Shelter Effect of the Forest Shelterbelt System around Jilantai Salt Lake after 35y's Running

  • Ding Yanlong ,
  • Wang Ji ,
  • Hu Shengrong ,
  • Gao Yong ,
  • Sun Xiaorui ,
  • Liu Bin ,
  • Yang Liming ,
  • Shen Guilu
Expand
  • 1. Desert Science and Engineering College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;
    2. Inner Mongolia Environmental Engineering Assessment Center, Hohhot 010011, China;
    3. Water and Soil Conservation Station of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010020, China;
    4. Inner Mongolia Lantai Industry Limited Liability Company, Alashan 750336, Inner Mongolia, China

Received date: 2018-07-03

  Revised date: 2018-10-07

  Online published: 2019-09-29

摘要

以吉兰泰盐湖风沙防护林体系为研究对象,在2017年5月初一次强风沙尘天气下,对防护林体系不同下垫面地表0~0.5 m高度风沙流通量进行了监测,并评估了防护林体系建立35 a以后的防护效果。结果表明:(1)吉兰泰盐湖防护林体系内外,林带盖度增加使得地表风速降低更加明显。不同下垫面的总输沙量流动沙垄 > 白刺灌丛 > 盐湖湖心 > 盐碱滩地 > 防护林带,防护林带内总输沙量仅为流动沙垄的5.96%,林带内部输沙量相对于流动沙垄的降低比例为建立初期的4倍。(2)受防护林带的影响,林带内风沙流趋于贴近地表,超过84.70%的输沙量均在地表0.3 m高度内,7.36%~87.34%的输沙量在0.1 m高度内。(3)根据风沙流特征值计算结果,风沙流在经过防护林体系时发生2次蚀积转换,流动沙垄及盐湖湖心以风蚀为主,白刺灌丛、防护林带、盐碱滩地以积沙为主。历经35 a发展后,防护林体系内地表输沙量相比对照沙垄降低更加明显。据1986年在7.0 m·s-1风速下的监测记录,林带内输沙量为流动沙垄的22.22%,而如今林带内输沙量为0.1 kg·m-2·min-1,仅为流动沙垄的4.54%,相比建立初期,防护林带阻沙作用更为显著。

本文引用格式

丁延龙 , 汪季 , 胡生荣 , 高永 , 孙晓瑞 , 刘斌 , 杨黎明 , 沈桂露 . 吉兰泰盐湖风沙防护林体系建立35 a以来防沙效益评估[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019 , 39(5) : 111 -119 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00130

Abstract

In this paper, we take the forest shelterbelt system around Jilantai Salt Lake as the research object, to assess its shelter effect after 35 years running. During a strong dust event in May of 2017, the sand transport above the different underlying surfaces (0-0.50 m) around the shelterbelt system were monitored. We reevaluated the protective effectiveness of the shelterbelt system. The results indicated that the total sediment transport fluxes reduced as the following sequence:active longitudinal dune > Nitraria Tangutorum vegetated dune > salt lake > lakeshore > shelterbelts. With the increasing of the forest coverage, the surface wind speed decreased more obviously, the total amount of sediment transport flux in the shelterbelt was only 5.96% of the active longitudinal dune. The now days' decrease proportion of sediment transport in the forest belt to the active longitudinal dune was 4 times of that 35 years' ago. Over 84.70% of the sediment transport in the shelter system was within 0.3 meters above the ground surface, and 7.36%-87.34% was concentrated within 0.1 meter. Based on the results of the sand flow eigenvalue, the sand flow occurred twice conversions between wind erosion and deposition during the shelterbelt system, the active longitudinal dune showed erosion, the Nitraria Tangutorum vegetated dune, shelter forest and lakeshore showed deposition, while the salt lake turned to be erosion again. In 1986, the amount of sand transported in the shelterbelt was 22.22% of the active longitudinal dune. While in 2017, it decreased to 4.54%. After 35 years running, the sand-trapping efficiency of the shelterbelt system around Jilantai Salt Lake was getting more and more effective.

参考文献

[1] 郑绵平,张永生,刘喜方,等.中国盐湖科学技术研究的若干进展与展望[J].地质学报,2016,90(9):2123-2166.
[2] 高永.吉兰泰盐湖环境演化及沙害成因[J].干旱区研究,1996,13(4):54-56,66.
[3] 耿侃,陈育峰.吉兰泰盐湖的形成、发育和演化[J].地理学报,1990,45(3):341-349.
[4] 司建华,冯起,常宗强,等.阿拉善雅布赖风沙区荒漠植物群落结构和物种多样性研究[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(3):602-608.
[5] 鲍锋,董治宝.察尔汗盐湖沙漠沙丘沉积物粒度特征分析[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(6):355-359.
[6] 耿侃,胡春元.吉兰泰盐湖的演化趋向[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1989,24(3):86-91.
[7] 鲍锋.柴达木盆地察尔汗盐湖地区风沙地貌发育环境与过程[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2016.
[8] 鲍锋,董治宝.青藏铁路察尔汗盐湖段风沙活动特征[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(4):621-625.
[9] 王心源,郭华东,邵芸,等.利用多源遥感对吉兰泰盐湖沙漠侵害研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):110-112.
[10] 刘兴起,张辉.吉兰泰盐湖沙漠化及其治理的遥感监测研究[J].盐湖研究,2000,8(2):1-5.
[11] 马世威.吉兰泰盐湖西北部风沙地貌形态发育及沙害控制途径[J].中国沙漠,1990,10(3):16-27.
[12] 杨恒贵,张志广.吉兰泰盐湖沙害综合治理[J].中国沙漠,1994,14(2):64-68.
[13] 刘贤万.实验风沙物理与风沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
[14] 罗万银,董治宝,钱广强,等.栅栏防护体系空气动力学效应研究进展[J].中国沙漠2012,32(4):885-895.
[15] Luo W Y,Dong Z B,Qian G Q,et al.Near-wake flow patterns in the lee of adjacent obstacles and their implications for the formation of sand drifts:a wind tunnel simulation of the effects of gap spacing[J].Geomorphology,2014,213:190-200.
[16] 张加琼,张春来,吴晓旭,等.包兰铁路沙坡头段防护体系内的风沙沉降规律[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(1):16-22.
[17] 张莹花,康才周,刘世增,等.沙地云杉(Picea mongolica)农田防护林带不同配置模式的防风效果[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(5):859-866.
[18] 左忠,潘占兵,张安东,等.干旱风沙区农田防护林网空间风速与地表风蚀特征[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(2):135-141.
[19] 包岩峰.基于流场分析的绿洲防护林防风效果研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.
[20] 吉兰泰盐化集团公司志编纂领导小组.吉兰泰盐化集团公司志[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,2003.
[21] 吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[22] 张正偲,董治宝.腾格里沙漠东南部野外风沙流观测[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(4):973-980.
[23] 哈斯.腾格里沙漠东南缘沙丘表面风沙流结构变异的初步研究[J].科学通报,2004,49(11):1099-1104.
[24] 韩致文,缑倩倩,杜鹤强,等.新月形沙丘表面100 cm高度内风沙流输沙量垂直分布函数分段拟合[J].地理科学,2012,32(7):892-897.
[25] 王洪涛,董治宝,张晓航.风沙流中沙粒浓度分布的实验研究[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(5):732-735.
[26] Dong Z B,Qian G Q.Characterizing the height profile of the flux of wind-eroded sediment[J].Environmental Geology,2007,51(5):835-845.
[27] Holy.Erosion and Environment[M].Oxford,UK:Pergamon Press,1980.
[28] 陈新闯,董智,李锦荣,等.乌兰布和沙漠不同下垫面冬季沙尘通量[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1527-1532.
[29] 马世威.风沙流结构的研究[J].中国沙漠,1988,8(3):11-25.
[30] 刘芳,郝玉光,辛智鸣,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北缘地表风沙流结构特征[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(5):1200-1207.
[31] 刘芳,郝玉光,辛智鸣,等.乌兰布和沙区不同下垫面的土壤风蚀特征[J].林业科学,2017,53(3):128-137.
[32] 高永.吉兰泰盐湖沙害综合防护体系及效益的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古林学院,1993.
文章导航

/