基于国家级和自治区级非物质文化遗产（简称非遗）资源空间数据，集成相关自然地理环境和社会经济文化数据，采用最邻近分析、核密度估计和全局空间自相关分析，研究新疆非遗的空间分布规律和集聚特征，采用地理探测器模型深入探究影响新疆非遗空间分布的自然因素、经济因素和社会文化因素。结果表明：新疆非遗空间分布呈现北多南少的特征，主要集中在喀什、伊犁、塔城、巴州和乌鲁木齐等地（市、州）；新疆非遗在空间上具有明显的集聚特征，不同类型非遗的集聚程度也有差异，在空间上形成了乌鲁木齐-吐鲁番-库尔勒为核心的一级组团、伊宁和喀什为核心的二级组团以及以塔城、哈密和阿克苏为中心的若干三级组团。新疆非遗空间分布受自然因素、经济因素、社会文化因素的综合影响：社会文化因素（0.5494）>经济因素（0.4597）>自然因素（0.2285）。自然因素和经济因素、社会文化因素的协同效应对非遗空间分布的影响更明显。

Based on the spatial data of national and provincial intangible cultural heritage （ICH） projects in Xinjiang， this study integrates relevant physical geographical environment and social， economic and cultural data， and adopts nearest neighbor analysis， kernel density estimation and spatial autocorrelation analysis to study the spatial distribution and agglomeration characteristics of ICH in Xinjiang. The geodetector model was used to explore the physical factors， economic factors and sociocultural factors affecting the spatial distribution of ICH in Xinjiang. The results show that the spatial distribution of ICH in Xinjiang is more in the north and less in the south， mainly concentrated in Kashgar， Yili， Tacheng， Bazhou and Urumqi. Traditional music and Traditional skills are the main categories of ICH， while traditional art， Quyi and drama are less distributed. The ICH of Xinjiang has obvious spatial agglomeration characteristics， and different types of ICH have different agglomeration degrees， among which traditional skills， traditional fine arts， traditional music and folk literature have higher degrees of aggregation. Traditional sports， recreational arts and acrobatics， traditional dance， traditional medicine and Quyi have relatively low levels of concentration. In space， there are the first-level agglomeration groups with Urumqi-Turpan-Korla as the core， the second-level agglomeration groups with Yining and Kashgar as the core， and several third-level agglomeration groups with Tacheng， Hami and Aksu as the centers. The spatial distribution of ICH in Xinjiang is comprehensively affected by natural factors， economic factors and social and cultural factors. Among them， the influence was as follows： Sociocultural factors （0.5494）>Economic factors （0.4597）>Physical factors （0.2285）. The interaction study found that the synergistic effect of natural factors， economic factors and sociocultural factors had a more obvious influence on the spatial distribution of ICH.