Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2013, Vol. 33 Issue (2): 560-567    DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00077
    
Determination of Critical Period and Requirment of Ecological Water Demanded in the Ejina Oasis in Lower Reaches of the Heihe River
SI Jian-hua, FENG Qi, XI Hai-yang, YU Teng-fei, LI Wei
Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Siences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Download:  PDF (2199KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Due to its extremely vulnerable ecological condition and its seriously degraded vegetation, the Ejina Oasis, located in lower reaches of the Heihe River, has key importance for realizing the goal of improving the environmental quality of the whole Heihe River Basin. The present plan for allocating the water to areas along the river is characterized by definite yearly quantity and inflow-determined letting-out time. Under this scheme, the water requirement by plant and water supply through allocating are often not simultaneous, the growing of the vegetation in the oasis is consequently affected. So, we should pay as same or more attention on the letting-out time of water as on water quantity allocated. In order to make the time of requirement and supply meet, we must be aware of the critical period of the plant species in the oasis. By monitoring the temporal-spatial variation of groundwater level at lower reaches of the Heihe River as well as analyzing the relationship between water consumption by natural vegetation and eco-hydrological process in the Ejina Oasis, we pointed out the key periods and quantity of ecological water requirement for the local vegetation as follows. At least 0.80×108 m3 and 1.08×108m3 of ecological water should be replenished in April and August, respectively, if rational regulating reservoirs outflow and channel runoff are concerned.

Key words:  groundwater level      ecological water demand      critical period of ecological water demand      Ejina Oasis     
Received:  10 September 2012      Published:  30 September 2012
ZTFLH:  P641  

Cite this article: 

SI Jian-hua, FENG Qi, XI Hai-yang, YU Teng-fei, LI Wei. Determination of Critical Period and Requirment of Ecological Water Demanded in the Ejina Oasis in Lower Reaches of the Heihe River. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(2): 560-567.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00077     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2013/V33/I2/560

[1]李卫红,郝兴明,覃新闻,等.干旱区内陆河流域荒漠河岸林群落生态过程与水文机制研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(6):1113-1117.

[2]唐德善,蒋晓辉.黑河调水及近期治理后评价[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.

[3]司建华,冯起,张小由,等.黑河下游分水后的植被变化初步研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(4):631-640.

[4]席海洋,冯起,司建华.实施分水方案后对黑河下游地下水影响的分析[J].干旱区地理,2007,30(4):487-495.

[5]龚家栋,董光荣,李森,等.黑河下游额济纳绿洲环境退化及综合治理[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(1):44-50.

[6]张武文,史生胜.额济纳绿洲地下水动态与植被退化关系的研究[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(4):421-425.

[7]李俊清,卢琦,褚建民,等.额济纳绿洲胡杨林研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.

[8]杨国宪,侯传河,韩献红.黑河额济纳绿洲生态与水[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2005.

[9]李利,张希明.光照对胡杨幼苗定居初期生长状况和生物量分配的影响[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(2):31-34.

[10]马焕成,王沙生.胡杨对渗透胁迫和盐分胁迫的不同响应[J].西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):1-7.

[11]谷瑞升,蒋湘宁,郭仲琛.胡杨细胞和组织结构与其耐盐性的关系研究[J].植物学报,1999,41(6):576-579.

[12]刘建平,李志军,何良荣.胡杨、灰叶胡杨种子萌发期抗盐性的研究[J].林业科学,2003,40(2):165-169.

[13]曹生奎,冯起,司建华,等.极端干旱区胡杨生长季水分利用效率变化特征研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(3):724-729.

[14]冯绳武.河西黑河(弱水)水系的变迁[J].地理研究,1988,7(1):12-16.

[15]王根绪,程国栋.近50年来黑河流域水文及生态环境的变化[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(3):233-238.

[16]李森,李凡,孙武,等.黑河下游额济纳绿洲现代荒漠化过程及其驱动机制[J].地理科学,2004,24(1):61-67.

[17]肖生春,肖洪浪,蓝永超,等.近50 a来黑河流域水资源问题与流域集成管理[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):529-535.

No Suggested Reading articles found!