Evaluation on Drought-resistant Characteristics of Ten Caragana Species Based on Leaf Micromorphological Structure

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00203

JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 708-717.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00203

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation on Drought-resistant Characteristics of Ten Caragana Species Based on Leaf Micromorphological Structure

Li Mengmeng^1,2, Liu Dan^1,2, Liu Yubing¹

1. Key Laboratory of Stress Physiology and Ecology in Cold and Arid Regions of Gansu Province/Shapotou Desert Research & Experiment Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-12-01 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-20

Abstract

Abstract:

Leaves of ten Caragana species were collected from desert region of northwest China. The leaf cross-section and epidermal micromorphology were observed by light microscope and scanning electron microscope, respectively. Ten micromorphological and structural characteristics were selected to investigate the adaptive ability of drought environment, including blade thickness, stomata density, trichome coverage, cuticular layer thickness and other six leaf xeromorphic structure indices. The results showed that leaf epidermal micromorphology and mesophyll structure had significant adaptation to their habitats. Ten Caragana species were classified into three groups by hierarchical cluster analysis. The first group has higher stomata, blade and epidermal cell thickness, smaller trichome coverage and ratio of palisade to blade. The second has higher trichome coverage, smaller palisade and ratio of palisade to blade. The third has higher palisade and ratio of palisade to blade, smaller stomata, cuticle, blade and epidermal cell thickness. According to the subordinate function values, drought-resistance ability of ten Caragana species was as the follows: C. ordosica>C. roborvskyi>C. brachypoda>C. stenophylla>C. korshinskii>C. microphylla>C. intermedia>C. rosea>C. jubata>C. acanthophylla.

Key words: Caragana, mesophyll structure, epidermal micromorphology, drought-resistance

CLC Number:

Q944.5

Li Mengmeng, Liu Dan, Liu Yubing. Evaluation on Drought-resistant Characteristics of Ten Caragana Species Based on Leaf Micromorphological Structure[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(3): 708-717.

References

[1] 燕玲,李红,刘艳.13种锦鸡儿属植物叶的解剖生态学研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(1):100-106.
[2] 李一帆,江莎,古松,等.内蒙古地区锦鸡儿属三种植物叶表皮微形态比较研究[J].植物研究,2008,28(6):668-678.
[3] 宋玉霞,郭生虎,马洪爱.贺兰山15种旱生灌木叶表皮扫描电镜观察[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(7):1283-1287.
[4] 马成仓,高玉葆,郭宏宇,等.内蒙古高原西部荒漠区锦鸡儿属(Caragana)优势种的形态适应特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2308-2312.
[5] 刘明国,苏芳莉,马殿荣,等.多年生樟子松人工纯林生长衰退及地力衰退原因分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(4):274-277.
[6] 严子柱,满多清,李得禄.沙葱(Album mongolicum)解剖结构与抗旱性[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):890-894.
[7] 闻志彬,张明理.30种藜科C₄植物同化器官解剖结构及δ¹³C值[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(4):1015-1022.
[8] 石登红,陈训.6种杜鹃花属(Rhododendron)植物叶片结构的研究[J].贵州科学,2005,23(3):39-45.
[9] Holmes M G,Keiller D R.Effects of pubescence and waxes on the reflectance of leaves in the ultraviolet and photosynthetic wavebands:a comparison of a range of species[J].Plant Cell & Environment,2002,25(1):85-93.
[10] Fahn A,Cutler DF.Xerophytes.Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy,Band Ⅲ,Teil 3[M].Berlin,Germany:Gebruder Borntraeger,1992:176.
[11] Klich M G.Leaf variations in Elaeagnus angustifolia related to environmental heterogeneity[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2000,44(3):171-183.
[12] Zhao Q F,Ma R J,Du G Z,et al.Ecological signification of the leaf structure of three species of Ligularia in differential altitudes[J].Journal of Lanzhou University:Natural Science Edition,2006,42(1):33-39.
[13] Mendes M M,Gazarini L C,Rodrigues M L.Acclimation of Myrtus communis to contrasting Mediterranean light environments effects on structure and chemical composition of foliage and plant water relations[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2001,45(2):165-178.
[14] Sam O,Jeréz E,Dell'Amico J,et al.Water stress induced changes in anatomy of tomato leaf epidermes[J].Biologia Plantarum,2000,43(2):275-277.
[15] Safia B,Arezki D,Thierry A,et al.Comparative Morphology of Leaf Epidermis in Eight Populations of Atlas Pistachio (Pistacia atlantica Desf.,Anacardiaceae)[J].Microscopy Research and Technique,2007,70(10):837-846.
[16] Bosabalidis A M,Kofidis G.Comparative effects of drought stress on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars[J].Plant Science,2002,163(2):375-379.
[17] Upchurch G R.Cuticle evolution in early cretaceous angiosperms from the Potomac group of Virginia and Maryland[J].Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,1984,71(2):522-550.
[18] 王勇,梁宗锁,龚春梅,等.干旱胁迫对黄土高原4种蒿属植物叶形态解剖学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(16):4535-4548.
[19] Pallardy S G,Kozlowski T T.Frequency and length of 21 Populus clones[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1979,57:2519-2523.
[20] Tewari R,Agarwal A.Distinctive stomatal structure from dispersed leaf cuticle of Sindhudurg formation,Ratnagiri district,Maharashtra,India[J].Currentence,2001,81(12):1638-1641.
[21] Weng J H,Hsu F H.Gas exchange and epidermal characteristics of Miscanthus populations in Taiwan varying with habitats and nitrogen application[J].Photosynthetica,2001,38(1):35-41.
[22] 邵邻相,张凤娟.6种松科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].植物研究,2005,25(3):281-285.
[23] 高艳,崔洪霞,石雷,等.丁香属植物叶片表皮形态特征与环境适应及系统学关联[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(3):0475-0484.
[24] 王维睿,苏世平,李毅,等.6个地理种群红砂(Reaumuria soongocica)叶片生态解剖特征及抗旱性评价[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):895-900.
[25] 潘存娥,田丽萍,李贞贞,等.5种杨树无性系叶片解剖结构的抗旱性研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(2):21-25.
[26] 韩刚,李少雄,徐鹏,等.6种灌木叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):43-46.
[27] 贾丽,曲式曾.豆科锦鸡儿属植物研究进展[J].植物研究,2001,21(4):515-518.
[28] 张明理.锦鸡儿属分析生物地理学的研究[J].云南植物研究,1998,20(1):1-11.
[29] 周道玮,王爱霞,李宏.锦鸡儿属锦鸡儿组植物分类与分布的研究[J].东北师范大学学报:自然科学版,1994(2):64-68.
[30] 关林婧,马成仓.21世纪锦鸡儿属植物研究进展[J].草地学报,2014,22(4):697-705.
[31] 马成仓,高玉葆,蒋福全,等.小叶锦鸡儿和狭叶锦鸡儿的生态和水分调节特性比较研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(7):1442-1451.
[32] 常朝阳,张明理.锦鸡儿属植物幼茎及叶的解剖结构及其生态适应性[J].植物研究,1997,17(1):65-71.
[33] 郭卫华,李波,黄永梅,等.不同程度的水分胁迫对中间锦鸡儿幼苗气体交换特征的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2716-2722.
[34] 王赞,高洪文,韩建国,等.柠条锦鸡儿不同居群形态变异研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(1):118-123.
[35] 杨九艳,杨劼,杨明博.鄂尔多斯高原锦鸡儿属植物叶的解剖结构及其生态适应性[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(3):175-179.
[36] 王洪新,胡志昂,钟敏,等.毛乌素沙地锦鸡儿(Caragana)种群种子蛋白多样性及其生物学意义[J].生态学报,1994,14(4):372-380.
[37] 王洪新,胡志昂,钟敏,等.毛乌素沙地锦鸡儿(Caragana)种群形态变异[J].生态学报,1994,14(4):365-371.
[38] 魏伟,王洪新,胡志昂.毛乌素沙地柠条群体分子生态学初步研究:RAPD证据[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):16-22.
[39] 刘玉冰,李新荣,周生荟,等.3种不同生境芦苇叶表皮微形态和叶绿体结构特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):873-877.
[40] Liu Y B,Li X R,Chen G X,et al.Epidermal Micromorphology and Mesophyll Structure of Populus euphratica Heteromorphic Leaves at Different Development Stages[J].PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0137701.
[41] 李芳兰,包维楷.植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J].植物学通报,2005,22(增刊):118-127.
[42] 李杰,贺学礼,李景侠.河北小五台山不同海拔高度胡枝子叶片解剖结构特征的比较[J].河北大学学报:自然科学版,2007,27(2):184-187.
[43] 杨九艳,杨劼,杨明博,等.鄂尔多斯高原锦鸡儿属植物叶表皮特征及生态适应性[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(6):961-967.
[44] Wooley J T.Water relations of soybean leaf hairs[J].Agronomy Journal,1964,56(6):569-571.
[45] Chartzoulakis K,Patskas A,Kofidis G,et al.Water stress affects leaf anatomy,gas exchange,water relations and growth of two avocado cultivers[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2002,95(1):39-50.
[46] 李进,张秀伏.利用梯度分析技术对12种锦鸡儿属植物抗旱性的定量研究[J].中国沙漠,1996,16(4):356-359.
[47] 胡营,楚家海,李建强.4个花苜蓿居群叶片解剖结构特征及其可塑性对不同水分处理的影响[J].植物科学学报,2011,29(2):218-225.
[48] 李永华,卢琦,吴波,等.干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(1):88-98.
[49] 赵小仙,李毅,苏世平,等.3个地理种群蒙古沙拐枣同化枝解剖结构及抗旱性比较[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(5):1293-1300.
[50] Dong X J,Zhang X S.Some observations of the adaptations of sandy shrubs to the arid environment in the Mu Us Sandland:leaf water relations and anatomic features[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2001,48(1):41-48.
[51] 李广毅,高国雄,吕悦来,等.三种灌木植物形态特征及解剖结构的对比观察[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(2):141-145.
[52] 贺金生,陈伟烈,王勋陵.高山栎叶的形态结构及其与生态环境的关系[J].植物生态学报,1994,18(3):219-227.
[53] Wuenscher J E.The effect of leaf hairs of Verbascum thapsus on leaf energy exchange[J].New Phytologist,1970,69(1):65-73.
[54] Ehleringer J,Bjorkman O,Mooney H A.Leaf pubescence:effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a desert shrub[J].Science,1976,192(4237):376-377.
[55] 杨明博,杨吉力,杨九艳,等.鄂尔多斯高原不同生境条件下中间锦鸡儿植物叶片表皮特征及遗传多样性变化分析[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(6):1181-1189.
[56] 张晓艳,杨惠敏,侯宗东,等.土壤水分和种植密度对春小麦叶片气孔的影响[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(1):133-136.
[57] 李晶.内蒙古高原3种锦鸡儿植物(Caragana)输水结构与抗旱性的相关研究[D].天津:南开大学,2008:1-136.
[58] 章尧想,刘芳,段娜,等.4种锦鸡儿属(Caragana)植物抗旱性研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(19):25-29.

Evaluation on Drought-resistant Characteristics of Ten Caragana Species Based on Leaf Micromorphological Structure

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yan Zizhu, Man Duoqing, Li Delu. The Relationship Between Drought-resistance and Anatomical Structure of Allium mongolicum's Vegetative Organs [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(4): 890-894.
[2]	DING Wei;YANG Zhen-hua;ZHANG Shi-biao;CHAI Shou-xi. Morphological and Anatomical Structure of Leaves on Populus euphratica Oliv. in Qaidam Basin [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2010, 30(6): 1411-1415.
[3]	ZHOU Yi-jun, LIU Chun-lan, FENG Jin-chao, JIA Xiao-hong. Advances of Drought-resistance and Frigid-resistance Mechanism Research on Ammopiptanthus mongolicus [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2001, 21(3): 312-316.
[4]	ZHANG Guo-sheng. Research Progress on Trees and Shrub Drought-resistance and Woodland Water Activity in Arid and Semi-rid Region [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2000, 20(4): 363-368.
[5]	Zhou Haiyan. DROUGHT-RESISTANCE OF 4 TREES IN JINCHANG CITY [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 1997, 17(3): 301-303.