Tradeoffs-synergies Analysis among Ecosystem Services in Northwestern Valley Basin: Taking Yinchuan Basin as an Example

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00049

JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1731-1738.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00049

Previous Articles Next Articles

Tradeoffs-synergies Analysis among Ecosystem Services in Northwestern Valley Basin: Taking Yinchuan Basin as an Example

Li Hongjian^1,2, Ren Zhiyuan^1,2,3, Liu Yanxu⁴, Zhang Jing^1,2

1. College of Tourism and Environment Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China;
2. Center for Land Resources Research in Northwest China, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China;
3. Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China;
4. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2016-02-18 Revised:2016-03-28 Online:2016-11-20 Published:2016-11-20

Abstract

Abstract: An effective method of formulating "win-win" policies and the implementation of measures for regional development and ecological protection is to examine types, formation mechanisms, scale dependences and regional differences of tradeoffs and synergies among the ecosystem services. Based on relevant research models, this study evaluates the quality of NPP, soil conservation, water retention and sand prevention at the Yinchuan basin in 2000 and 2014. Besides, it also discusses tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and the characteristics of spatial distribution of ecological environment by using the correlation analysis, ESTD, hot cartography of space, and makes a machine to rational analysis. The result shows that, during the period of 2000 to 2014, the four kinds of ecosystem service qualities have significantly improved, whose distribution are rendered "around the high, middle low" spatial distribution pattern; The correlation analysis displays that synergy is the dominant relationship among ecosystem services, and the synergy degree of NPP with water retention and sand prevention is more obvious. The hot cartography of space indicates that the increased area of high value of the grid account for 21.64% of the total, while the reduced grid of high value items account for 21.49% of the total. This suggests that the whole function of ecosystem services in Yinchuan basin is increasing trend, but the internal law of increase or reduce is not inconsistent. The mechanism analysis shows that east, in latitudinal direction, rainfall factor impact on the ecosystem services accounts for dominant, 0.368; In east direction, the vegetation and elevation plays the leading role of 0.572 and 0.563 respectively; In northeast to southwest, the elevation and moisture effects on the ecosystem are the largest, -0.487 and -0.417 respectively; In northwest to southeast, it is also influencing the elevation and moisture, 0.628 and -0.628. Along with the change of scale, the tradeoff-synergy of ecosystem service has obvious scale dependence; The influence factors of the same scale space distribution pattern also have a big difference.

Key words: ecosystem services, tradeoffs-synergies degree, hot spot analysis, regional differences, Yinchuan Basin

CLC Number:

X171.1

Li Hongjian, Ren Zhiyuan, Liu Yanxu, Zhang Jing. Tradeoffs-synergies Analysis among Ecosystem Services in Northwestern Valley Basin: Taking Yinchuan Basin as an Example[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1731-1738.

References

[1] Assessment Millennium Ecosystem.Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Current State and Trends[M].Washington D C,USA:Island Press,2005.
[2] 李双成,刘金龙,张才玉,等.生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式[J].地理学报,2011,66(12):1618-1630.
[3] 杜建会,董玉祥,胡绵友.海岸沙地生态系统服务功能研究进展与展望[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):479-486.
[4] Daily G C.Natures Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M].Washington D C,USA:Island Press,1997:1-392.
[5] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[6] 葛菁,吴楠,高吉喜,等.不同土地覆被格局情景下多种生态系统服务的响应与权衡——以雅砻江二滩水利枢纽为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(9):2629-2639.
[7] 杨晓楠,李晶,秦克玉,等.关中-天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J].地理学报,2015,70(11):1762-1773.
[8] 林泉.草地生态系统服务权衡的方法研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
[9] Bennett E M,Peterson G D,Gordon L J.Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J].Ecology Letters,2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[10] Jia X Q,Fu B J,Feng X M,et al.The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi,China[J].Ecological Indicators,2014,43:103-113.
[11] Francesco B,Sandra L,Sandra D,et al.Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits[J].Biodiversity and Conservation,2010,19(10):2873-2893.
[12] Raudsepp H C,Peterson G D,Bennett E M.Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing trade-offs in diverse landscapes[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(11):5242-5247.
[13] Andrew L R,Keke M P,Robert H F.Spatial and temporal trade-offs by bluegills in floodplain river ecosystems[J].Ecosystems,2012,15(4):555-563.
[14] Rodriguez J P,Beard T D,Bennett E M,et al.Trade-offs across space,time,and ecosystem services[J].Ecology and Society,2006,11(1):709-723.
[15] Brent M S,Joseph K S,Meshack N,et al.Tradeoffs,synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the lake Victoria basin of East Africa[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2008,12(4):504-519.
[16] 任志远,张晗.银川盆地土地利用变化对景观格局脆弱性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016(1):1-11.
[17] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[18] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):413-424.
[19] 李柏延,任志远,易浪.2001-2010年榆林市土壤侵蚀动态变化趋势[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(5):918-925.
[20] 任志远,刘焱序.西北地区植被保持土壤效应评估[J].资源科学,2013,35(3):610-617.
[21] 陈东立,余新晓,廖邦洪.中国森林生态系统水源涵养功能分析[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(1):49-54.
[22] 秦嘉励,杨万勤,张健.岷江上游典型生态系统水源涵养量及价值评估[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(4):453-458.
[23] 李晶,任志远.陕北黄土高原土地利用防风固沙功能价值时空研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(7):183-187.
[24] 韩永伟,拓学森,高吉喜,等.黑河下游重要生态功能区植被防风固沙功能及其价值初步评估[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(1):58-65.
[25] 刘焱序,徐光,姜洪源,等.东北林区生态系统服务与健康协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(6):761-771.
[26] 吕郁彪.广西公益林生态效益价值评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(4):61-64.
[27] Potter C S,Rerson J T,Field C B.Terrestrial ecosystem production:a process model based on global satellite and surface data[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1993,7(4):811-841.
[28] 郭群,李胜功,胡中民,等.内蒙古温带草原典型草地生态系统生产力对水分在不同时间尺度上的响应[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(3):616-623.

Tradeoffs-synergies Analysis among Ecosystem Services in Northwestern Valley Basin: Taking Yinchuan Basin as an Example

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Li Li, Qingqing Zhang, Yamei Wang, Hong Li, Xinfeng Zhao. Comprehensive assessment of ecosystem vulnerability， the value of service function and risk in Kezi River Basin in 2000-2018 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 164-172.
[2]	Ma Pengli, Han Lanying, Zhang Xudong, Liu Weiping. Regional Characteristics of Drought in China under the Background of Climate Warming [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 209-215.
[3]	Liu Zhengyao, Dong Zhibao, Wang Jianbo, Dong Ruijie. Practice and Development of Deserticulture in Inner Mongolia, China: a view of ecosystem service system [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(4): 1057-1064.
[4]	Hu Yingying, Umut Halik, Tayierjiang Aishan, Huang Ting, Zhu Ya, Maierdang Keyimu. Vulnerability to Drought on Agriculture in Xinjiang during 2001-2010 [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(1): 254-259.
[5]	Zulpiya Mamat, Hamit Yimit, Anwar Eziz, Ajigul Ablimit. Response of Ecosystem Services Value to Land Use/Cover Change in the Yanqi Basin of Xinjiang, China [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(1): 275-283.
[6]	WANG Fei1,2, YANG De-gang1, WANG Chang-jian1,2, XIA Wen-jin1,2, YANG Fan1,2. Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Sustainable Development in Xinjiang Based on Improved Relative Carrying Capacity of Resources [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(5): 1605-1614.
[7]	CHENG Lei-lei, GUO Hao, LU Qi. Review on the Valuation of Desert Ecosystem Service Values [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(1): 281-287.
[8]	HUANG Feng, WU Shi-xin, TANG Hong. Response of Ecological Environment to Land Use/Cover Change in Xinjiang during 1990-2008 based on Remote Sensing and GIS [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2012, 32(5): 1486-1493.
[9]	MA Guo-jun;LIN Dong. Evaluation on Economic Value of Ecosystem Services in Shiyang River Basin [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2009, 29(6): 1173-1177.
[10]	ZHANG Fei;TASHPLAT Tiyip;DING Jian-li;;TIAN Yuan;. Spatial-Temporal Changes of Land Use and Ecosystem Services Value in the North of Tarim Basin: A case study on the Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2009, 29(5): 933-941.