Soil moisture infiltration characteristics of different sand-fixing plants in the desert-oasis transition zone in arid region of China

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2020.00098

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 200-208.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2020.00098

Previous Articles Next Articles

Soil moisture infiltration characteristics of different sand-fixing plants in the desert-oasis transition zone in arid region of China

Wei Gong(), Guanglu Hu(), Pengcheng Fu, Haoran Li, Chuan Zhou, Liyuan Deng

School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering，Lanzhou Jiaotong University，Lanzhou 730070，China

Received:2020-07-23 Revised:2020-09-06 Online:2020-09-28 Published:2020-09-28
Contact: Guanglu Hu

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the soil moisture infiltration characteristics of different sand-fixing plants in arid areas， three sand-fixing plants were selected in the desert-oasis transition zone in the middle reaches of the Heihe River in the north of Linze County， Gansu Province. The soil moisture infiltration was measured by the double-ring knife constant head test method， and carry out simulation and analysis of different models. The results show that：（1）The soil moisture infiltration rate has a negative correlation with the initial soil moisture content， and the correlation is significant at the initial stage of infiltration. （2）The initial infiltration rate， stable infiltration rate， and average infiltration rate of the three sand-fixing plants showed the order of Haloxylon ammodendron> Calligonum mongolicum>Nitraria sphaerocarpa， with significant differences （P<0.05）. （3）The simulation of the soil moisture infiltration process of different sand-fixing plants shows that the Philip model is the best， the Horton model is second， and the Kostiakov model is the worst. The Philip model is more suitable for studying the soil moisture infiltration process of different sand-fixing plants in this area. Research can provide a scientific basis for the rational use of soil moisture in arid areas and the restoration and reconstruction of degraded ecosystems.

Key words: sand-fixing plants, soil moisture, infiltration process, infiltration characteristics, desert-oasis transition zone

CLC Number:

S152.7

Wei Gong, Guanglu Hu, Pengcheng Fu, Haoran Li, Chuan Zhou, Liyuan Deng. Soil moisture infiltration characteristics of different sand-fixing plants in the desert-oasis transition zone in arid region of China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 200-208.

Figures/Tables 9

References 36

1	李军，王新军，贾宏涛，等.古尔班通古特沙漠南缘干季土壤水分含量空间异质性［J］.中国沙漠，2016，36（6）：1628-1636.
2	吴丽丽，刘丹一，杨文斌，等.降雨量、土壤蓄水量对流动沙地土壤水分深层渗漏的影响［J］.中国沙漠，2020，40（3）：210-218.
3	鲁瑞洁，唐清亮，魏殿生，等.青海湖湖东沙地不同沙丘降雨入渗研究［J］.中国沙漠，2013，33（3）：797-803.
4	刘殿君，吴波，李永华，等.极端干旱区增雨对泡泡刺（Nitraria sphaerocarpa）群落土壤呼吸的影响［J］.中国沙漠，2013，33（3）：788-796.
5	朱雅娟，贾志清，刘丽颖，等.民勤绿洲外围不同林龄人工梭梭林的土壤水分特征［J］.中国沙漠，2011，31（2）：442-446.
6	张勇勇，富利，赵文智，等.荒漠绿洲土壤优先流研究进展［J］.中国沙漠，2017，37（6）：1189-1195.
7	丁建丽，塔西甫拉提·特依拜，熊黑钢，等.塔里木盆地南缘绿洲荒漠化动态变化遥感研究：以策勒县为例［J］.遥感学报，2002，6（1）：56-62.
8	穆桂金，贺俊霞，雷加强，等.再议绿洲-沙漠过渡带：以策勒绿洲-沙漠过渡带为例［J］.干旱区地理，2013，36（2）：195-202.
9	邵明安，王全九，黄明斌.土壤物理学［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，2006.
10	王正宁，王新平.荒漠灌丛树干茎流及其入渗、再分配特征［J］.中国沙漠，2010，30（5）：1108-1113.
11	汤英，周宏飞，徐利岗.荒漠植被影响下的沙地稳定入渗率变化特征［J］.土壤通报，2009，40（2）：235-239.
12	张志山，李新荣，赵洋，等.沙坡头生态水文学研究进展及水量平衡自动模拟监测系统［J］.中国沙漠，2018，38（6）：1119-1135.
13	王新平，李新荣，康尔泗，等.腾格里沙漠东南缘人工植被区降水入渗与再分配规律研究［J］.生态学报，2003（6）：1234-1241.
14	周宏飞，周宝佳，汤英，等.古尔班通古特沙漠季节性冻土入渗特性试验研究［J］.干旱区地理，2009，32（4）：532-536.
15	陈宏祥，胡广录，赵晨宇，等.黑河中游荒漠绿洲过渡带固沙植被土壤水分的分布特征［J］.西北林学院学报，2017，32（6）：67-73.
16	樊立娟.荒漠绿洲过渡带斑块植被区土壤水分时空异质性研究［D］.兰州：兰州交通大学，2015.
17	孟阳阳，刘冰，刘婵.荒漠绿洲湿地土壤水热盐动态过程及其影响机制［J］.中国沙漠，2019，39（1）：149-160.
18	盛晋华，乔永祥，刘宏义，等.梭梭根系的研究［J］.草地学报，2004（2）：91-94.
19	马婷慧，王锐，孙权.两种固沙灌木根系分布与土壤水分差异研究［J］.林业实用技术，2012（10）：6-8.
20	丘明新，刘家琼.我国砾质荒漠中典型的荒漠植物群落：泡泡剌群落的研究［J］.西北植物研究，1983（2）：142-149，171.
21	齐瑞鹏，张磊，颜永毫，等.定容重条件下生物炭对半干旱区土壤水分入渗特征的影响［J］.应用生态学报，2014，25（8）：2281-2288.
22	赵景波，马延东，邢闪，等.腾格里沙漠宁夏回族自治区中卫市沙层水分入渗研究［J］.水土保持通报，2011，31（3）：12-16.
23	闫冰，周智彬，雷加强，等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林带土壤入渗研究［J］.水土保持学报，2012，26（4）：98-103.
24	Silva L L.Fitting infiltration equations to centre-pivot irrigation data in a Mediterranean soil［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2007，94（1/3）：83-92.
25	Horton R E.Analysis of runoff-plat experiments with varying infiltration-capacity［J］.Eos，1939，20（4）：693-711.
26	Philip J R.The theory of infiltration about sorptivity and alebraic infiltration equations［J］.Soil Science， 1957，83（5）：345-358.
27	Li X R，Tian F，Jia R L，et al.Do biological soil crusts determine vegetation changes in sandy desert region of Northern China？［J］.Hydrological Processes，2010，24（25）：3621-3630.
28	Assouline S.A model for soil relative hydraulic conductivity based on the water retention characteristic cure［J］.Water Resources Research，2001，37（2）：265-271.
29	张建丰.黄土区层状土入渗特性及其指流的实验研究［D］.陕西杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2004.
30	吕刚，吴祥云.土壤入渗特性影响因素研究综述［J］.中国农学通报，2008（7）：494-499.
31	赵西宁，吴发启，王万忠.黄土高原沟壑区坡耕地土壤入渗规律研究［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2004（4）：109-112.
32	王健，吴发启，孟秦倩，等.不同利用类型土壤水分下渗特征试验研究［J］.干旱地区农业研究，2006（6）：159-162.
33	尹立河，王晓勇，黄金廷，等.干旱区植被盖度增加对降水入渗补给地下水的影响：试验研究与数值模拟［J］.地质通报，2015，34（11）：2066-2073.
34	陈家林，郭二辉，杨果果，等.太行山低山丘陵区不同水土保持林地土壤渗透性能及其影响因素研究［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2016，36（10）：34-40.
35	张志华，桑玉强，孔玉华，等.太行山低山丘陵区坡位对土壤渗透性能影响研究［J］.灌溉排水学报，2018，37（9）：43-47.
36	武晓莉，吕相海，李国会，等.晋西黄土区典型植被类型的土壤水分特征［J］.林业科学研究，2014，27（4）：487-492.

固沙植物	月份	土壤初始含水率/%	时间/min
固沙植物	月份	土壤初始含水率/%	1	5	10	20	30	60	90	120
梭梭	6	5.2	5.804	4.453	4.203	4.195	3.912	3.722	3.812	3.622
	7	6.1	5.603	4.603	4.203	3.852	3.812	3.352	3.412	3.372
	8	13.5	4.203	3.452	2.852	3.202	2.982	3.026	3.022	3.018
	9	4.3	6.254	3.752	4.203	3.772	3.482	3.422	3.442	3.418
	10	3.8	6.254	5.303	4.052	3.952	3.742	3.242	3.172	3.142
沙拐枣	6	4.4	4.453	3.352	3.302	3.572	3.442	3.222	3.282	3.172
	7	4.2	4.603	3.752	3.202	2.942	2.782	2.742	2.712	2.662
	8	8.9	3.052	2.452	2.101	2.532	2.351	2.171	2.281	2.161
	9	4.6	4.803	3.152	2.652	2.492	2.241	2.091	2.061	2.031
	10	4.1	4.052	3.252	3.201	3.172	3.022	2.381	2.411	2.401
泡泡刺	6	2.6	4.153	2.602	2.101	2.091	2.051	1.931	1.811	1.831
	7	2.9	4.603	2.251	2.381	2.301	2.271	1.951	1.951	1.941
	8	13.2	1.001	0.925	0.901	0.851	0.710	0.720	0.710	0.750
	9	9.6	2.351	1.751	1.351	1.361	1.251	1.281	1.191	1.191
	10	5.8	3.052	2.551	2.462	2.351	2.211	1.851	1.841	1.831

固沙植物	月份	土壤初始含水率/%	时间/min
固沙植物	月份	土壤初始含水率/%	1	5	10	20	30	60	90	120
梭梭	6	5.2	5.804	4.453	4.203	4.195	3.912	3.722	3.812	3.622
	7	6.1	5.603	4.603	4.203	3.852	3.812	3.352	3.412	3.372
	8	13.5	4.203	3.452	2.852	3.202	2.982	3.026	3.022	3.018
	9	4.3	6.254	3.752	4.203	3.772	3.482	3.422	3.442	3.418
	10	3.8	6.254	5.303	4.052	3.952	3.742	3.242	3.172	3.142
沙拐枣	6	4.4	4.453	3.352	3.302	3.572	3.442	3.222	3.282	3.172
	7	4.2	4.603	3.752	3.202	2.942	2.782	2.742	2.712	2.662
	8	8.9	3.052	2.452	2.101	2.532	2.351	2.171	2.281	2.161
	9	4.6	4.803	3.152	2.652	2.492	2.241	2.091	2.061	2.031
	10	4.1	4.052	3.252	3.201	3.172	3.022	2.381	2.411	2.401
泡泡刺	6	2.6	4.153	2.602	2.101	2.091	2.051	1.931	1.811	1.831
	7	2.9	4.603	2.251	2.381	2.301	2.271	1.951	1.951	1.941
	8	13.2	1.001	0.925	0.901	0.851	0.710	0.720	0.710	0.750
	9	9.6	2.351	1.751	1.351	1.361	1.251	1.281	1.191	1.191
	10	5.8	3.052	2.551	2.462	2.351	2.211	1.851	1.841	1.831

固沙植物	a	b	R²
梭梭	19.574	0.937	0.99992
沙拐枣	13.782	0.885	0.99980
泡泡刺	6.759	0.902	0.99996

固沙植物	a	b	R²
梭梭	19.574	0.937	0.99992
沙拐枣	13.782	0.885	0.99980
泡泡刺	6.759	0.902	0.99996

固沙植物	深度/cm	Kostiakov模型	R²	Horton模型	R²	Philip模型	R²
梭梭	0~20	i(t)=9.419t^-0.068	0.825	i(t)=7.060+3.197e^-0.119^t	0.955	i(t)=1/2*8.275t^-0.5+6.610	0.934
	20~40	i(t)=5.894t^-0.059	0.523	i(t)=4.631+4.326e^-0.336^t	0.974	i(t)=1/2*6.633t^-0.5+4.126	0.912
	40~60	i(t)=5.134t^-0.038	0.480	i(t)=4.395+2.988e^-0.375^t	0.929	i(t)=1/2*4.156t^-0.5+4.074	0.819
	60~80	i(t)=5.963t^-0.139	0.922	i(t)=3.293+2.642e^-0.083^t	0.946	i(t)=1/2*7.667t^-0.5+2.941	0.926
	80~100	i(t)=5.146t^-0.098	0.910	i(t)=3.386+1.839e^-0.084^t	0.937	i(t)=1/2*5.414t^-0.5+3.129	0.948
	100~120	i(t)=4.087t^-0.077	0.967	i(t)=2.829+0.929e^-0.033^t	0.777	i(t)=1/2*3.137t^-0.5+2.787	0.818
沙拐枣	0~20	i(t)=8.365t^-0.076	0.942	i(t)=5.914+1.853e^-0.041^t	0.971	i(t)=1/2*6.605t^-0.5+5.736	0.938
	20~40	i(t)=6.771t^-0.137	0.964	i(t)=3.634+2.328e^-0.046^t	0.966	i(t)=1/2*8.140t^-0.5+3.377	0.926
	40~60	i(t)=5.020t^-0.131	0.963	i(t)=2.771+1.672e^-0.046^t	0.967	i(t)=1/2*5.824t^-0.5+2.593	0.911
	60~80	i(t)=4.809t^-0.108	0.929	i(t)=2.939+1.401e^-0.044^t	0.968	i(t)=1/2*5.089t^-0.5+2.776	0.982
	80~100	i(t)=4.198t^-0.121	0.917	i(t)=2.429+1.319e^-0.045^t	0.967	i(t)=1/2*4.704t^-0.5+2.281	0.928
	100~120	i(t)=3.615t^-0.152	0.941	i(t)=1.819+1.327e^-0.047^t	0.964	i(t)=1/2*4.709t^-0.5+1.657	0.948
泡泡刺	0~20	i(t)=6.184t^-0.062	0.677	i(t)=4.437+1.351e^-0.022^t	0.689	i(t)=1/2*4.768t^-0.5+4.498	0.912
	20~40	i(t)=4.043t^-0.075	0.847	i(t)=2.829+0.929e^-0.034^t	0.777	i(t)=1/2*3.654t^-0.5+2.738	0.917
	40~60	i(t)=3.355t^-0.126	0.645	i(t)=2.125+5.684e^-0.859^t	0.868	i(t)=1/2*4.426t^-0.5+1.714	0.934
	60~80	i(t)=2.908t^-0.097	0.786	i(t)=1.739+0.880e^-0.024^t	0.773	i(t)=1/2*3.189t^-0.5+1.751	0.924
	80~100	i(t)=1.686t^-0.199	0.724	i(t)=0.815+2.363e^-0.541^t	0.906	i(t)=1/2*2.872t^-0.5+0.561	0.956
	100~120	i(t)=1.633t^-0.289	0.729	i(t)=0.605+3.698e^-0.815^t	0.887	i(t)=1/2*3.184t^-0.5+0.294	0.978

Soil moisture infiltration characteristics of different sand-fixing plants in the desert-oasis transition zone in arid region of China

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

固沙植物	入渗时间
固沙植物	1 min	10 min	60 min	120 min
梭梭	-0.874^**	-0.484	-0.260	-0.212
沙拐枣	-0.709^**	-0.682^**	-0.479	-0.462
泡泡刺	-0.945^**	-0.926^**	-0.912^**	-0.864^**

[1]	Xueshang Chang, Guoqiao Chang. Advances in research and prospect on soil moisture in arid and semi-arid areas [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 156-163.
[2]	Qian Lu, Yi Li, Xiande Liu, Weijun Zhao. Soil moisture variation characteristics of Picea crassifolia forestry in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 142-148.
[3]	Baoyang Sun, Rui Zhou, Zhe Wang, Junbo Xiao, Jianye Ma, Chaodong Li, Bo Ma. The simulation study of wind erosion characteristics of different soils in Inner Mongolia reach of Yellow River [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 120-127.
[4]	Wang Mingming, Liu Xinpin, Li Yulin, Chelmeg, Luo Yongqing, Sun Shanshan, Wei Jing. Soil Moisture Dynamic under Different Plant Coverages in Sandy Grassland during Growing Season [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(5): 54-61.
[5]	Ma Junmei, Man Duoqing, Li Delu, Liu Youjun, Guo Chunxiu. Characteristics of Vegetation Succession and Soil Moisture in Abandoned Cropland of Arid Desert Region [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(4): 800-807.
[6]	Liao Xiaohe, He Qing, Jin Lili, Yang Xinghua, Ali Mamtimin, Huo Wen, Yang Fan. Change of Surface Albedo, Soil Temperature and Moisture under Snow Cover in the Hinterland of Taklimakan Desert in Winter [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(2): 393-400.
[7]	Sun Yihui, Xia Jiangbao, Ren Ranran, Zhao Ziguo. Soil Water Ecological Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Types in Sand Habitat Formed from Seashell [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(1): 133-139.
[8]	Yang Qiguo, Yang Xingguo, Zhang Xudong, Ma Pengli, Liu Hongyi, Li Xiaofeng, Dang Xuanfa, Kong Lingwang. Difference of Actual Evapotranspiration Measured by Two Sizes Lysimeters [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(1): 167-174.
[9]	Zhou Hai, Zhao Wenzhi. Response of Soil Moisture to Precipitation Pulse by Stable Isotope in Desert Area of the Hexi Corridor [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1637-1645.
[10]	Wang Jiao, Ding Jianli, Yuan Ze, Chen Wenqian, Li Xiang, Huang Shuai. Improvement and Comparison of Soil moisture Monitoring Algorithm in Oasis Based on Ts-NDVI Feature Space [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1606-1612.
[11]	Li Jun, Wang Xinjun, Jia Hongtao, Zhao Chengyi. Multi-scale Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture in the South Gurbantunggut Desert during Dry Period [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1628-1636.
[12]	Li Sen, Yan Changzhen, Xie Jiali. Space-temporal Analysis on Surface Soil Moisture Data in the Different Dunes of the Southeast Margin of the Tengger Desert [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(3): 734-740.
[13]	Yao Shuxia, Zhao Chuancheng, Zhang Tonghui, Wang Suyun, Li Xudong. Variation of Soil Moisture at Fixed Sand Dune in the Horqin Sandy Land [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(1): 111-117.
[14]	Wu Yongqiu, Zhang Jianfeng, Du Shisong, Hasi Eerdun, Huang Wenmin. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Soil Moisture in Dunes with Different Vegetation Coverage in Southern Margin of the Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(6): 1612-1619.
[15]	Lu Lina, Zhao Yuxing, Hu Lifang, Li Weixiang, Shi Lin, Ren Yuyan, Han Yiliang, He Xiaohui. Effects of Hippophae rhamnoides Plantation on Soil Bulk Density, Porosity and Moisture Capacity in the Arsenic Sandstone Area of Inner Mongolia [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(5): 1171-1176.