Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Effect of Wind-proof and Sand Accumulation in Low Coverage Wingbag Sand Barrier

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00073

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 177-183.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00073

Previous Articles Next Articles

Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Effect of Wind-proof and Sand Accumulation in Low Coverage Wingbag Sand Barrier

Gao Tianxiao^1,2, Wang Tao³, Yang Wenbin^2,4, Zhao Aiguo³, Ni Haiyuan², Wu Lili⁴, Gao Yong¹

1. Desert Science and Engineering College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Low Coverage Sand Control Technology Development Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010010, China;
3. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
4. Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2019-08-01 Revised:2019-09-23 Published:2019-11-14

Abstract

Abstract: Wing bag sand barrier is a combined sand barrier designed according to the bottom bag fixed quicksand and the wings on the bag in the wind to reduce the wind speed. In this experiment, for the windbag sand barrier, the wind speed flow field and sand-fixing effect were simulated under four wind speed conditions. The results show that:(1) Compared with the bag-shaped sand barrier (control):the wind-proof effect of the wing-bag sand barrier increases by an average of 48%, and the greater the wind speed, the more obvious the effect of reducing the wind speed, indicating that the fluctuation of the wing can significantly weaken the wind speed. (2) Compared with the control, the sediment transport of the wing pocket sand barrier was reduced by 81.44% (wing height 10 cm) and 88.92% (wing height 20 cm). (3) The same bag with a diameter of 10 cm, the wind erosion of the wing bag with a wing height of 20 cm is increased by 13.6% compared with the wind speed of 10 cm, and the wind erosion is increased by 19%. The wing bag sand barrier has the function of sand fixation and weakening wind speed, which significantly improves the wind and sand fixation effect of the sand barrier and opens up a new way for sand prevention and control.

Key words: wing bag sand barrier, wind tunnel test, flow field structure, wind-proof effect, amount of sediment

CLC Number:

S157.1

Gao Tianxiao, Wang Tao, Yang Wenbin, Zhao Aiguo, Ni Haiyuan, Wu Lili, Gao Yong. Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Effect of Wind-proof and Sand Accumulation in Low Coverage Wingbag Sand Barrier[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 177-183.

References

[1] 王涛,朱震达.中国沙漠化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2001(2):11-16.
[2] 吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[3] 陈广庭.沙害防治技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[4] 高永,邱国玉,丁国栋,等.沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(3):111-116.
[5] 王丽英,李红丽,董智,等.沙柳方格沙障对库布齐沙漠防风固沙效应的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):115-118.
[6] 屈建军,刘贤万,雷加强,等.尼龙网栅栏防沙效应的风洞模拟实验[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(3):62-66.
[7] 董智,李红丽,左合君,等.土壤凝结剂沙障防沙机理的风洞模拟实验研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004(3):154-159.
[8] 张克存,屈建军,俎瑞平,等.不同结构的尼龙网和塑料网防沙效应研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):483-487.
[9] 董智,李红丽,汪季,等.土工格栅沙障防风积沙效应风洞模拟实验[J].中国水土保持科学,2007(1):35-39.
[10] 郭彩贇,韩致文,钟帅,等.库布齐沙漠新材料沙障的风速廓线特征[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(5):260-265.
[11] 杨文斌,卢琦,吴波,等.低覆盖度不同配置灌丛内风流结构与防风效果的风洞实验[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(5):791-796.
[12] 杨文斌,杨红艳,卢琦,等.低覆盖度灌木群丛的水平配置格局与固沙效果的风洞试验[J].生态学报,2008(7):2998-3007.
[13] 张克存,俎瑞平,方海燕.不同孔隙度尼龙网对风沙流减弱作用的风洞模拟[J].水土保持学报,2004,28(4):4-6,11.
[14] 屈建军,井哲帆,张克存,等.HDPE蜂巢式固沙障研制与防沙效应实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2008(4):599-604.
[15] 罗万银,董治宝,钱广强,等.直立阻沙栅栏流场特征的风洞模拟实验[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(2):200-205.
[16] 中国林业科学研究院.低覆盖度羽翼袋沙障:中国,ZL 201610993756.X[P].2019-03-22.
[17] 中国林业科学研究院.一种羽翼袋沙障:中国,ZL 201721403835.7[P].2018-05-11.

Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Effect of Wind-proof and Sand Accumulation in Low Coverage Wingbag Sand Barrier

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Li Jingwen, Bao Yanfeng, Guo Hao, Liu Minghu, Xin Zhiming, Liu Pengfei. Wind tunnel test of wind speed reduction of Haloxylon anmodendron forests with different configuration [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(3): 77-84.
[2]	Yang Yinhai, Xue Chunxiao, Shi Long, Li Kaichong, Kong Lingwei, Zhang Fang. Sand resistance rate of retaining wall along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 173-178.
[3]	Li Xiaoye, Wang Kejian, Gu Jiancai, Liu Qiguo, Cui Yan. Windbreak Effect Model of Forest Belts with Different Structure [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 118-125.
[4]	Yang Caihong, Feng Fuxue, Chai Qiang, Geng Yanxiang, Fu Xingzhou. Soil Wind Erosion in Wheat/Maize Intercropping with Zero Tillage and Straw Retention [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(4): 9-15.
[5]	Li Xuelin, Ma Yanjun, Ma Rui, Zhang Yinghua, Tang Weidong, Yang Jinjie. Wind Flow Field and Windproof Efficiency of Shelterbelt in Different Width [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5): 936-944.
[6]	Tan Fengzhu, Wang Xueqin, Wang Haifeng, Xu Junrong, Yuan Xinxin. Wind Tunnel Simulation of the Three-Dimensional Airflow Patterns around Tamarix ramosissima Nebkhas under the Change of Background Vegetation Coverage [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(1): 48-57.
[7]	Zhang Yinghua, Kang Caizhou, Liu Shizeng, Tang Jinnian, Wei Linyuan, Li Jinhui. Windbreak Effect of Picea mongolica Farmland Shelterbelt with Different Configuration [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(5): 859-866.
[8]	ZHANG Chun-lai, ZOU Xue-yong, DONG Guang-rong, LIU Yu-zhang. Aerodynamic Roughness of Cultivated Soil and Its Influence on Soil Erosion by Wind in a Wind Tunnel [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2002, 22(5): 473-475.
[9]	LIU Xiao-ping, DONG Zhi-bao. Wind Tunnel Tests of the Roughness and Drag Partition on Vegetated Surfaces [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2002, 22(1): 82-87.
[10]	Hu Yingdi. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON THE ABILITY OF COMBATING EROSION OF SEVERAL CHEMICAL SAND-FIXINGMATERIALS [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 1997, 17(1): 103-106.