| 生物土壤与生态 |
|
|
|
|
| Intraspecific Competition in Natural Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa Forests in Hunshandake Sandland |
| Zhaorige, LI Gang-tie, YUE Yong-jie, ZOU Shou-yi |
| Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The intraspecific competition in natural Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa forests in the Hunshandake Sandland was quantitatively studied by making use of the method of gradually expanding observation scope and the Hegyis competition model for individual tree. For Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa community, the optimal competition distance of the objective trees is 8 meters, the intraspecific competition in natural Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa forests gradually become weakened with the diameter classes increasing. The relationship between the competition intensity and the diameter of the objective trees at breast height（DBH）follows a power function and the result predicted by the model reveals that when Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa diameter at breast height is less than 30 cm, the competition intensity change remarkably; and when Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa diameter at breast height is more than 30 cm, the competitions vary little in intensity. It indicates that the method of gradual expanding the scope can effectively determine the scope of the competitive trees and also can reflect the intraspecific competition of natural Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa forests in Hunshandake Sandland. Thinning measure should be adopted to enhance the growth of plants and reinforce the stability of the ecosystem.
|
|
Received: 25 August 2010
Published: 20 March 2011
|
|
|
[1]韩路,王海珍,周正立,等.塔里木荒漠优势植物——胡杨种内-种间竞争研究[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(12):2547-2552.
[2]胡旭,王海涛,卢建国,等.干旱和半干旱区油蒿对土壤空间异质性的响应[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):588-592.
[3]史宇,余新晓,岳永杰,等.北京山区天然侧柏林种内竞争研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,11(30):36-40.
[4]张池,黄忠良,李炯,等.黄果厚壳桂种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(1):22-26.
[5]王希群,马履一.油松侧柏林种内竞争特点的对比研究[J].生态科学,2006,25(6):481-484.
[6]段仁燕,王孝安,黄敏毅,等.秦岭太白山巴山冷杉种内和种间竞争特性的研究[J].武汉植物学研究[J].2007,25(6):581-585.
[7]王志高,王孝安,肖娅萍.太白红杉群落优势种的生态位研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(10):1780-1783.
[8]段仁燕,王孝安.太白红杉种内种间竞争的研究[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(2):242-250.
[9]邹春静,徐文铎.沙地云杉种内、种间竞争的研究[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(3):269-274.
[10]李先琨,苏宗明,欧祖兰,等.元宝山冷杉群落种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J].植物资源与环境学报,2002,11(1):20-24.
[11]韩路,王海珍,周正立,等.塔里木河流域灰叶胡杨种内竞争研究[J].塔里木大学学报,2006,18(2):1-4.
[12]何跃军,刘济明.桫椤群落的种内种间竞争研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2004,26(5):590-593.
[13]金则新,张文标.濒危植物七子花种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J].植物研究,2004,24(1):54-58.
[14]苏文华.西双版纳热带季雨林林冠种群种内、种间竞争的初步研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,10(8):50-54.
[15]王立龙,王广林,黄永杰,等.黄山濒危植物小花木兰生态位与年龄结构研究[J].生态学报,2006,26(6):1862-1871.
[16]赵永华,雷瑞德,何兴元,等.秦岭锐齿栎林种群生态位特征研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):913-918.
[17]邹春静,徐文铎.沙地云杉种内、种间竞争的研究[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(3):269-274.
[18]康华靖,陈子林,刘鹏,等.大盘山香果树种内及其与常见伴生种之间的竞争关系[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3456-3463.
[19]张宁,滕玖琳,何兴东,等.猫头刺群落对土壤养分空间异质性的响应[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):706-711.
[20]张跃西.邻体干扰模型的改进及其在营林中的应用[J].植物生态学报,1993,17(4):352-357.
[21]张存厚,刘果厚,赵杏花.浑善达克沙地种子植物属的地理成分分析[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(6):1024-1032.
[22]李钢铁,姚云峰,邹受益,等.科尔沁沙地榆树疏林草原及其封育更新研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18（4）:152-157.
[23]李钢铁,姚云峰,张德英.科尔沁沙地疏林草原植被恢复技术体系[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2005,26(3):1-6.
[24]李钢铁,姚云峰.浑善达克沙地桑根达来地区榆树疏林的分布与立地因子的关系的研究[J].世界林业研究,2008,21（Sep）:82-86.
[25]刘建,刘凤红,董鸣,等.浑善达克沙地南缘榆树种群的大小结构和邻体格局[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):75-80.
[26]赵丽,王晓江,刘果厚,等.浑善达克沙地榆树种群结构、格局及动态研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(3):509-513.
[27]张红霞,刘果厚,崔秀萍.干旱对浑善达克沙地榆叶片解剖结构的影响[J].植物研究,2005,25(1):39-45.
[28]李红丽,董智,王林和,等.浑善达克沙地榆树根系分布特征及生物量研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(4):99-105.
[29]张靖媛,李钢铁,崔立强,等.浑善达克沙地沙地榆种群年龄结构研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37（11）:5214-5217
[30]刘果厚,贾宝丽.浑善达克沙地榆遗传多样性的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(5):123-128.
[31]李方祯,宛涛,伊卫东,等.锡盟沙地榆遗传多样性的RAPD研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2008,10(3):71-76.
[32]刘树林, 王涛.浑善达克沙地的土地沙漠化过程研究[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(5):719-724.
[33]刘树林,王涛,屈建军.浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化过程中土壤粒度与养分变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):611-616.
[34]岳平,牛生杰,刘晓云.浑善达克沙地春季沙尘暴期间沙尘启动及传输特性研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(2):227-230.
[35]彭宇.浑善达克退化生态系统恢复的自然保护途径[D].中国科学院研究生院(植物研究所),2006. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
2011, Vol. 31 
