Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2012, Vol. 32 Issue (2): 364-371    DOI:
Desert and Desertification     
Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics of C3 Desert Plant Reaumuria soongorica and C4 Desert Plant Salsola passerina to Different Drought Degrees
YAN Qiao-di1,2, SU Pei-xi1, GAO Song1,2
1.Linze Inland River Basin Research Station/Plant Stress Ecophysiology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2.Instutyte if Ecology, Taizhou University, Linhai 317000, China
Download:  PDF (3115KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  The mixed community of C3 and C4 plants is easily seen in grassland ecosystem, but hardly seen in desert ecosystem. In desert regions of China, some C3 and C4 shrubs coexist in particular manners in some specific habitats and adapt to the extreme arid environment, which is associated with high temperature and intensive radiation. The mixed communities of C3 undershrub Reaumuria soongorica and C4 subshrub Salsola passerina in the Heihe River Basin in Hexi Corridor were investigated. The physiological characteristics of gas exchange of R. soongorica and S. passerina in the mixed community were determined under different drought degrees. Results showed that net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (Gs) of R. soongorica were all higher than S. passerina, while water use efficiency of S. passerina was higher than R. soongorica. The differential responses of the two species to severe habitat shows that R. soongorica and S. passerina take different strategies for survival when suffering water scarcity in the same desert habitats: R. soongorica uses the means of maintaining a higher net photosynthetic rate and a higher transpiration rate to survive, while S. passerina survives here through the higher water use efficiency.
Key words:  Reaumuria soongorica      Salsola passerina      coexistence      gas exchange      adaptive strategy to drought     
Received:  19 May 2011      Published:  20 March 2012
ZTFLH: 

Q945

 
Articles by authors
YAN Qiao-di
SU Pei-xi
GAO Song

Cite this article: 

YAN Qiao-di, SU Pei-xi, GAO Song. Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics of C3 Desert Plant Reaumuria soongorica and C4 Desert Plant Salsola passerina to Different Drought Degrees. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2012, 32(2): 364-371.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V32/I2/364

[1]Warrick R,Gifford R,Parry M.Climate change and agriculture[M]//Bolin B,Doos B R,Jager J,et al.The Greenhouse Effect,Climate Change and Ecosystems.New York:John Wiley and Sons,1986:393-473.

[2]Ward J K,Tissue D T,Thomas R B,et al.Comparative responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2[J].Global Change Biology,1999,5:857-867.

[3]Moore P D.High hopes for C4 plants[J].Nature,1994,367:322-323.

[4]Pearcy R W,Calkin H W.Carbon dioxide exchange of C3 and C4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest[J].Oecologia,1983,58:26-32.

[5]Svejcar T J,Boutton T W.The use of stable carbon isotope analysis in rooting studies[J].Oecologia,1985,67:205-208.

[6]苏培玺,严巧娣.内陆黑河流域植物稳定碳同位素变化及其指示意义[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1616-1624

[7]贾荣亮,周海燕,谭会娟,等.超旱生红砂与珍珠光合生理生态日变化特征初探[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):631-636.

[8]丘明新,刘家琼.珍珠植物群落的研究[J].生态学报,1982,4:311-318.

[9]刘家琼,丘明新,蒲锦春,等.我国荒漠典型超旱生植物——红砂[J].植物学报,1982,24(5):485-488.

[10]马茂华,孔令韶.新疆呼图壁绿洲外缘的琵琶柴生物生态学特性研究[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(3):237-244.

[11]种培芳,李毅,苏世平.荒漠植物红砂叶绿素荧光参数日变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):539-545.

[12]周生荟,刘玉冰,谭会娟,等.荒漠植物红砂在持续干旱胁迫下的光保护机制研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(1):69-73.

[13]黄子琛,沈渭寿.干旱区植物的水分关系与耐旱性[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000:1-3.

[14]Schlesinger W H,Reynolds J F,Cunningham G L,et al.Biological feedbacks in global desertification[J].Science,1990,247:1043-1048.

[15]宋维民,周海燕,贾荣亮,等.土壤逐渐干旱对4种荒漠植物光合作用和海藻糖含量的影响[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(3):449-454.

[16]Sparks J P,Black R A.Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa:The role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation[J].Tree Physiology,1999,119:453-459.

[17]Atkinson C J,Policarpo M,Webster A D,et al.Drought tolerance of clonal Malus determined from measurements of stomatal conductance and leaf water potential[J].Tree Physiology,2000,20:557-563.

[18]Flexas J,Medrano H.Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants:stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited[J].Annals of Boatny,2002,89:183-189.

[19]Wilson K B,Baldocchi D D,Hanson P J.Quantifying stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation resulting from leaf aging and drought in mature deciduous tree species[J].Tree Physiology,2000,20:787-797.

[20]Ehleringer J R,Monson R K.Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1993,24:411-439.

[21]Ojima D S,Schimel D S,Parton W J.Long-term and short-term effects of fire on nitrogen cycling in tall grass prairie[J].Biogeochemistry,1994,24:67-84.

[22]Wand S J E,Midgley G F,Jones M H,et al.Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration:A meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions[J].Global Change Biology,1999,5:723-741.

[23]唐海萍,刘书润,张新时.内蒙古地区的C4植物及其生态地理特性的研究[J].植物学报,1999,41:420-424.

[24]Su P X,Chen H S,An L Z,et al.Carbon assimilation characteristics of plants in oasis-desert ecotone and their response to CO2 enrichment[J].Science in China(Ser.D Earth Science),2004,47(Supp.1):39-49.

[25]Pearcy R W,Tumosa N,Williams K.Relationships between growth,photosynthesis and comperetive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant[J].Oecologia,1981,48:371-376.

[26]Ehleringer J R,Sage R F,Flanagan L B,et al.Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1991,6:95-99.

[27]曹生奎,冯起,司建华,等.植物水分利用效率研究方法综述[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):853-858.

[28]Cohen D.The expected efficiency of water utilization in plant under different competition and selection regimes[J].Israel Journal of Botany,1970,19:50-54

[29]Givnish T J.On the adaptive significance of leaf form[M]//Solbrig O T,Jain S,Johnson G B,Raven P H.Topics in Plant Population Biology.New York:Columbia University Press,1979:375-407.

[30]Zangerl A R,Bazzaz F A.Effects of short-term selection along environmental gradients on variation in populations of Amaranthus retroflexus and Abutilon theophrasti[J].Ecology,1984,65:207-217.

[31]Donovan L A,Ehleringer J R.Contrasting water-use patterns among size and life-history classes of semi-arid shrub[J].Functional Ecology,1992,6:482-488.

[32]Ares A,Fownes J H,Sun W.Genetic differentiation of intrinsic water-use efficiency in the Hawaiian native Acacia koa[J].International Journal of Plant Sciences,2000,161:909-915.

[33]Heschel M S,Riginos C.Mechanisms of selection for drought stress tolerance and avoidance in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany,2005,92:37-44.
No Suggested Reading articles found!