甘肃几种早熟禾内源激素水平及干旱适应性

俞玲; 马晖玲

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00451

中国沙漠 >

2015 , Vol. 35 >Issue 1: 182 - 188

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00451

生物与土壤

甘肃几种早熟禾内源激素水平及干旱适应性

俞玲 ,
马晖玲

展开

甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点试验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

俞玲(1987-),女,甘肃景泰人,硕士研究生,主要研究草种质资源及育种.Email: 503379294@qq.com

收稿日期: 2013-09-30

修回日期: 2013-11-10

网络出版日期: 2015-01-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31160482)

收起

The Endogenous Hormone Level and Drought Adaptability of Four Kentucky Bluegrass Species in Gansu, China

Yu Ling ,
Ma Huiling

Expand

College of Pratacultural/ Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem/Sino-U.S. Center for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received date: 2013-09-30

Revised date: 2013-11-10

Online published: 2015-01-20

Fold

摘要

以甘肃陇西、清水、秦州野生草地早熟禾为试验材料,商用品种午夜2号为对照,采用优化的HPLC法测定了干旱胁迫下草地早熟禾叶片中玉米素(ZT)、脱落酸(ABA)和吲哆乙酸(IAA)含量的变化.结果表明:干旱胁迫后,清水和秦州野生草地早熟禾植株萎蔫死亡,相比较之下陇西野生草地早熟禾和午夜2号却能够较好地适应干旱逆境.与此同时,供试材料的ZT含量均下降,下降幅度59.25%～66.02%;ABA和IAA含量均先上升后下降,但与对照相比ABA含量显著上升,上升幅度为23.63%～59.55%;IAA含量显著下降, 下降幅度为48.34%～53.35%;此外,供试材料的ZT/IAA、ZT/ABA和(ZT+IAA)/ABA均下降,以减少生长量来主动适应干旱胁迫.在激素水平上评价材料的抗旱性大小为陇西野生草地早熟禾>午夜2号>秦州野生草地早熟禾>清水野生草地早熟禾.

关键词： 干旱胁迫; 早熟禾; 内源激素; 干旱适应性; 相关性

本文引用格式

俞玲 , 马晖玲 . 甘肃几种早熟禾内源激素水平及干旱适应性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015 , 35(1) : 182 -188 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00451

Abstract

Some wild germplasm materials of Kentucky bluegrass collected from Gansu Province (Longxi, Qingshui, Qinzhou) were used as doner materials, and the MidnightⅡ, a commercial variety, was set as control. The content of abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and zeatin (ZT)in leaves of Kentucky bluegrass exposed to drought stress were determined by improved HPLC. The results showed that: The grass from Qingshui and Qinzhou wilted and died after the drought stress, however, the MidnightⅡ that from Longxi survived. ZT content of all the materials significantly decreased and the descent range was 59.25%-66.02%; both ABA and IAA content increased firstly and then decreased, compared with the control, ABA content significantly increased and the rising range was 23.63%-59.55%; while IAA content significantly decreased, and the descent range was 48.34%-53.35%. In addition, the ZT/ABA、ZT/IAA and (ZT+IAA)/ABA decreased, suggesting that the grass could slow down growth to adapt to drought stress in initiative way. The drought resistance ability of the doner materials ranked as Longxi > MidnightⅡ > Qinzhou > Qingshui. It was done at the evaluation standard of hormones level. The study may provide reference evidences for the selection of excellent varieties and germplasm materials for turf establish in arid region.

Key words： drought stress; Kentucky bluegrass; endogenous hormone; drought adaptability; correlation

参考文献

[1] 马忠华,张云芳,徐传祥,等.早熟禾的组织培养和基因枪介导的基因转化体系的初步建立[J].复旦学报,1999,38(5):540-544.
[2] Nilsen E T,Orcutt D M.Physiology of Plants under Stress.Abiotic factors[M].New York,USA:John wiley and Sons,1996:322-361.
[3] Shinozaki K,Yamaguchi-Shinozaki,K.Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response[J].Plant Physiology,1997,115(2):327-334.
[4] Wang C A,Yang H Y,Zhang J.Influence of water stress on endogenous hormone concentrations and cell damage of maize seedlings[J].Integrative Plant Biology,2008,50:427-434.
[5] 李智念,王光明,曾之文.植物干旱胁迫中的ABA研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(2):99-104.
[6] 李冀南,李扑芳,孔海燕,等.干旱胁迫下植物根源化学信号研究进展[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2610-2620.
[7] 牛俊义,闫志利,林瑞敏,等.干旱胁迫及复水对豌豆叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(6):154-159.
[8] 张明生,谢波,谈锋.水分胁迫下甘薯内源激素的变化与品种抗旱性的关系[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(5):498-501.
[9] 沈法富.短季棉衰老的激素变化及衰老相关基因的克隆[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2004.
[10] 李东晓,李存东,孙传范,等.干旱对棉花主茎叶片内源激素含量与平衡的影响[J].棉花学报,2010,22(3):231-235.
[11] 李芳红,乔文兰,王瑞贞,等.干旱胁迫下草地早熟禾幼苗几种抗旱性指标的变化[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2007,26(3):70-87.
[12] 颜丽丽.干旱胁迫下4个野生早熟禾属草种的抗旱性研究[J].天津农业科学,2011,17(6):25-29.
[13] 李进芳,颜红波,周青平.3 种早熟禾苗期的短期抗旱性研究[J].草业科学,2007,24(5):27-40.
[14] 张媛媛,马晖玲,俞玲,等.草地早熟禾愈伤组织诱导和分化中内源激素水平分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2013,48(2):74-79.
[15] 康宗利,杨玉红,张立军.植物响应干旱胁迫的分子机制[J].玉米科学,2006,14(2):96-100.
[16] 赵文魁,童建华,张雪芹,等.干旱胁迫下几种柑桔植物内源激素含量的变化规律[J].农业与技术,2007,27(4):55-58.
[17] 孙志勇,季孔庶.干旱胁迫对杂交鹅掌楸无性系叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(31):17362-17364.
[18] 汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应性[J].植物生理学通讯,1983(3):21-29.
[19] 潘根生,吴伯千,沈生荣,等.水分胁迫过程中茶树新稍内源激素水平的消长及其与耐旱性的关系[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(5):9-15.
[20] Pustovoitova T N,Zhdanova N E,Zholkevich V N.Changes in the levels of IAA and ABA in cucumber leaves under progressive soil drought[J].Plant physiology,2004,51:513-517.
[21] 王霞,候平,尹林克,等.土壤缓慢水分胁迫下柽柳植物内源激素的变化[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(4):41-43.
[22] 陈立松,刘星辉.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].热带作物学报,1999,20(3):31-35.
[23] 韩瑞宏,张亚光,田华.干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿叶片几种内源激素的变化[J].华北农学报,2008,23(3):81-84.
[24] 马晖玲,李玉珠.植物原生质体培养的影响因素分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2007,13(4):38-43.
[25] Chan K Y,Heenan D P.Effect of tillage and stubble management on soil water store,crop growth and yield in a wheat-lupine rotation southern NSW[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1996,47(3):479-488.
[26] 马宗仁,刘荣堂.牧草抗旱生理学[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,1993.
[27] 贺继临,刘鸿先.干旱胁迫下不同抗旱性小麦叶片内源激素含量的变化与抗旱力强弱的关系[J].热带亚热带植物学报,1998,6(4):341-346.
[28] 陈立松,刘星辉.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].热带作物学报,1999,(9):31-35.
[29] 年悦,王楠,崔震海,等.北方粳稻灌浆期水分胁迫条件下叶片内源激素变化的研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(21):33-37.
[30] 白利国,俞玲,马晖玲,等.野生草地早熟禾对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].草原与草坪,2013,11(4):23-28.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献