| [1]张金屯.植物种群空间分布的点格局分析[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(4):57-62.[2]李素清,武冬梅,王涛,等.山西长治湿地草本植物优势种群和群落的空间格局分析[J].草业学报,2011,20(3):43-50.[3]胡喜生,洪滔,范海兰,等.不同演替阶段木荷林幼苗分布格局的研究[J].福建林业科技,2006,33(2):100-104.[4]尹林克.塔里木河中下游退耕土地转化利用的理论与实践[M].乌鲁木齐:新疆科学技术出版社,2010:30-100.[5]张金屯.数量生态学[M]:北京:科学出版社,2011:250-279.[6]Zhang J T.Analysis of spatial point pattern for plant species[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1998,22(4):344-349.[7]Valett H M,Baker M A,Morrice J A,et al.Biogeochemical and metabolic responses to the flood pulse in a semiarid floodplain[J].Ecology,2005,86(1):220-234.[8]张宝田,杨允菲.松嫩平原羊草草地水淹干扰恢复过程的群落动态[J].草业学报,2003,12(2):30-35.[9]杨允菲,张宝田.松嫩平原蒙古蒿种群无性系分株的生长与生物量分配规律[J].草业学报,2003,12(1):11-17.[10]Touzard B,Amiaud B,Langlois E,et al.The relationships between soil seed bank,aboveground vegetation and disturbances in an eutrophic alluvial wetland of Western France[J].Flora-Morphology,Distribution,Functional Ecology of Plants,2002,197(3):175-185.[11]徐海量,陈亚宁,雷加强.塔里木河下游生态输水对沙漠化逆转的影响[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):173-176.[12]Bissels S,Holzel N,Donath T W,et al.Evaluation of restoration success in alluvial grasslands under contrasing flooding regimes[J].Biological Conservation,2004,118:641-650.[13]周斌,杨红梅,胡顺军,等.河水漫溢对塔里木河下游土壤及植被的影响[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(3):442-448.[14]Renison D,Hensen I,Cingolani A M.Anthropogenic soil degradation affects seed viability in Polylepis australis mountain forests of central Argentina[J].Forest ecology and management,2004,196(2/3):327-333.[15]高润宏,董智,张昊,等.额济纳绿洲胡杨林更新及群落生物多样性动态[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1019-1025.[16]赵峰侠,尹林克.荒漠内陆河岸胡杨和多枝柽柳幼苗种群空间分布格局及种间关联性[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(7):972-977.[17]李吉玫,徐海量,张青青,等.塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林不同退化区胡杨种群结构和空间分布格局研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):897-904.[18]韩路,王海珍,周正立,等.塔里木胡杨林主要种群空间分布格局与动态研究[J].西南林学院学报,2007,27(2):1-5.[19]张绘芳,李霞.塔里木河下游胡杨种群空间分布格局分析[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(10):2125-2130.[20]Ripley B D.Modelling spatial patterns[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,Series B (methodological),1977,39(2):172-212.[21]周斌.河水漫溢对荒漠河岸林植被及土壤的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2011.[22]徐海量,陈亚宁,杨戈.塔里木河下游生态输水对植被和地下水位的影响[J].环境科学,2003,24(4):18-22.[23]徐海量,叶茂,李吉玫.塔里木河下游输水后地下水动态变化及天然植被的生态响应[J].自然科学进展,2007,17(4):460-470.[24]黄粤,陈曦,钱静,等.塔里木河干流生态闸洪水漫溢过程分布式水文模拟——以灿木里克生态闸为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):37-43.[25]陈曦,黄粤,钱静,等.干旱区内陆河漫溢型生态用水调控的模拟分析——以塔里木河干流灿木里克生态区为例[J].中国科学(D辑),2006,36:1-8.[26]赵振勇,张科,卢磊,等.塔里木河中游洪水漫溢区荒漠河岸林实生苗更新[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3322-3329.[27]徐海量,叶茂,李吉玫,等.河水漫溢对荒漠河岸林植物群落生态特征的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(12):4990-4998.[28]Kint V,Van Meirvenne M,Nachtergale L,et al.Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development:A comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis[J].Forest Science,2003,49(1):36-49.[29]Clark P J,Evans,F C.Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations[J].Ecology,1954,35(4):445-453.[30]Moeur M.Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data[J].Forest Science,1993,39(4):756-775.[31]王本洋,余世孝.种群分布格局的多尺度分析[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(2):235-241.[32]张青青,徐海量,安红燕,等.塔里木河下游河水漫溢后胡杨幼苗分布格局初探[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(11):2298-2303.[33]张运春,张桥英,罗鹏,等.克隆乔木黄牛奶树空间点格局分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(3):67-73.[34]张金屯,孟东平.芦芽山华北落叶松林不同龄级立木的点格局分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):35-40.[35]周灿芳,余世孝.种群分布格局测定的样方尺度效应[J].广西植物,2003,23(1):19-22.[36]侯向阳,韩进轩.长白山红松林主要树种空间格局的模拟分析[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(3):242-249.[37]于军,王海珍,陈加利,等.塔里木河流域荒漠河岸林胡杨群落的空间格局研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):913-918.[38]常静.准噶尔盆地西北缘典型荒漠植物群落优势种种群空间格局分析[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2006.[39]Nathan R,Safriel U N,Noy-Meir I,et al.Spatiotemporal variation in seed dispersal and recruitment near and far from Pinus halepensis trees[J].Ecology,2000,81(8):2156-2169.[40]王增如,徐海量,尹林克,等.塔里木河下游荒漠化过程土壤种子库特征[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):885-890.[41]张玉波,李景文,张昊,等.胡杨种子散布的时空分布格局[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):1994-2000.[42]华鹏.胡杨实生苗在河漫滩自然发生和初期生长的研究[J].新疆环境保护,2003,25(4):14-17.[43]Rand T A.Seed dispersal,habitat suitability and the distribution of halophytes across a salt marsh tidal gradient[J].Journal of Ecology,2000,88(4):608-621.[44]安红燕,叶茂,徐海量,等.塔里木河下游胡杨径向生长量对生态输水的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):957-962.[45]陈亚宁,张小雷,祝向民,等.新疆塔里木河下游断流河道输水的生态效应分析[J].中国科学（D辑:地球科学）,2004,34(5):475-482.[46]徐海量,宋郁东,艾合买提·那由普.塔里木河下游生态输水对草地恢复的影响[J].中国草地,2003,25(6):17-20.[47]李先琨,苏宗明,向悟生,等.濒危植物元宝山冷杉种群结构与分布格局[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2246-2253. |
2013, Vol. 33 
